Allahabad HC Rejects Police Protection for Married Couple in Live-In Relationship Under Section 494 IPC

Married Person Cannot Seek Live-In Protection Without Divorce: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a married person cannot claim legal protection for a live-in relationship with a third person without obtaining a divorce, as personal liberty under Article 21 is not absolute and cannot override the statutory rights of the existing spouse. This judgment clarifies the boundaries of fundamental rights in the context of marriage and live-in relationships, and reinforces the prohibition against bigamy.

Allahabad HC: Public Employment is Public Trust; Unlawful Appointments Under Articles 14 & 16 Cannot Be Protected

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that public employment is a public trust, and appointments secured through deceit, misrepresentation, or abuse of judicial process cannot be protected. The court upheld the termination of a teacher whose appointment was found unlawful, and ordered recovery of salary and benefits received under interim court protection, reinforcing the constitutional mandate of equality under Articles 14 and 16.

Allahabad HC: Hindu Man Can Adopt Own Illegitimate Son under Hindu Adoptions Act, 1956

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a Hindu man can adopt his own biological child born out of wedlock under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, provided statutory requirements are met. This clarifies the distinction between capacity to give and take a child in adoption, and has implications for inheritance and property rights.

Allahabad HC Holds Right to Choose Spouse Under Article 21; Cites Article 25 on Voluntary Conversion

The Allahabad High Court has reaffirmed that the right to choose a matrimonial partner is part of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and that voluntary religious conversion is protected under Article 25 (Freedom of Conscience and Religion). The judgment, freeing a man confined by his father after converting to Islam, is crucial for understanding the scope of fundamental rights in interfaith relationships and the limits of state anti-conversion laws.

Allahabad HC Orders CBI Probe Into UP Police Encounter, Questions Police Narrative on Shooting

The Allahabad High Court has ordered a CBI probe into a police encounter in UP where a rape accused was shot in both legs, questioning the police's version of events. The court's strong observations about the pattern of police encounters and the rights of the accused make this a landmark judgment for police accountability and criminal justice reforms.

Allahabad HC Upholds Mandatory Govt Service Bond for Subsidised PG Medical Education

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that doctors who pursue subsidised PG medical education cannot evade the mandatory two-year government service bond, even if there is administrative delay in providing posting. The court held that the bond ensures availability of doctors in government hospitals and protects patients' right to life under Article 21.

Allahabad HC Dismisses Hijab Petition: Muslim Girls' Enrolment Drops from 18% to 12.9% in Higher Secondary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition seeking permission to wear a headscarf in school, upholding uniform dress code. However, the case highlights a deeper issue: Muslim girls' enrollment in schools drops sharply from 18% at primary level to just 12.9% at higher secondary (UDISE+ 2024-25). The article argues that strict uniform rules, when applied without accommodation, may become a barrier to education for Muslim girls, referencing the Supreme Court's split verdict in the hijab case and the Sachar Committee's findings on cultural hostility.

Allahabad HC Quashes NSA Detention of 25-Year-Old DU Graduate in Noida Workers' Protest

The Allahabad High Court quashed the NSA detention of a 25-year-old Delhi University graduate in connection with the Noida workers' protest. This ruling underscores judicial scrutiny of preventive detention laws and the necessity of sufficient grounds. For exam aspirants, it is a key example of judicial review under Article 226 and the limits of the National Security Act.