The Supreme Court has declined to mandate menstrual leave nationwide, placing the onus on the legislature to craft a policy balancing gender justice with labor market realities. This decision highlights the feminist policy tension between protection and parity, as seen in the Karnataka policy currently challenged in High Court.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Female LFPR (PLFS 2023-24): 41% (Overall), 25% (Urban)
- ›Gender Pay Gap: 20% less for salaried women
- ›Target this Data: Female LFPR (41% overall, 25% urban) and gender pay gap (20%) from PLFS 2023-24.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) as a proposed model for socialized menstrual leave cost.
- ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life) as the basis for menstrual health rights, as affirmed in Dr Jaya Thakur v. Govt of India (2026).
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.