PolityGovernance
News 9 of 23

SC Allows Passive Euthanasia for 32-Year-Old in Persistent Vegetative State for 13 Years Under Article 21

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
11 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:13 years32 years old
Bodies:Supreme CourtAIIMS
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court allowed passive euthanasia for Harish Rana, a 32-year-old in a persistent vegetative state for 13 years, permitting withdrawal of life support.

2.The AIIMS palliative care unit will follow a 'natural end' protocol, focusing on comfort and dignity, not hastening or prolonging death.

3.This case revives the debate on end-of-life care and the legal mechanism for passive euthanasia established after the Aruna Shanbaug judgment.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has permitted passive euthanasia for a 32-year-old man in a persistent vegetative state for 13 years. This case, similar to the landmark Aruna Shanbaug case, highlights the legal and ethical framework for withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in India, anchored in the right to life with dignity under Article 21.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Patient Age32 years
Time in Vegetative State13 years
Hospital InvolvedAIIMS, Delhi
Previous Landmark CaseAruna Shanbaug case

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Patient Age: 32 years
  • ›Time in Vegetative State: 13 years
  • ›Target this Data: 13 years (duration in vegetative state)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (granting approval)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Supreme Court's approval for passive euthanasia in the case of Harish Rana is fundamentally linked to which constitutional article?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the news on passive euthanasia for Harish Rana:

1. The patient has been in a persistent vegetative state for over a decade.

2. The Supreme Court's decision is based on the principles established in the Gian Kaur case.

3. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi, will provide palliative care focusing on hastening the patient's end.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

For how many years had Harish Rana been in a persistent vegetative state before the Supreme Court's decision on passive euthanasia?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

According to the former AIIMS expert quoted in the article, what is the core principle guiding the palliative care approach for Harish Rana?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Tamil Nadu Issues Advance Medical Directives Guidelines 2026 for Passive Euthanasia

Tamil Nadu has issued the Tamil Nadu Advance Medical Directive Guidelines, 2026 to operationalise passive euthanasia and strengthen patient autonomy at the end of life. The guidelines follow Supreme Court directions in Common Cause and Harish Rana vs Union of India, requiring States to establish medical boards and custodians for Advance Medical Directives. This is a landmark state-level health governance step with direct UPSC and State PSC relevance.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

EC Decision-Making Under Scrutiny: Article 324, CEC Act 2023, Dissent Notes Explained

The Election Commission's internal dissent has come under the spotlight after two Election Commissioners recorded objections 14 times in 10 months. This raises critical questions about the functioning of a constitutional body, the balance between unanimity and majority decision-making, and the protection of dissenting voices — a core area for UPSC and State PSC exams.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

7 Years After Article 370 Revocation: J&K Still Awaits Statehood, Per Capita Income Ratio Falls to 76.6%

Seven years after the revocation of Article 370 and the loss of statehood, Jammu and Kashmir continues to face economic decline, high unemployment, and heavy-handed security measures. Despite Supreme Court advice to restore statehood, no timeline has been set. The article highlights the need for accountable governance through an elected administration, as the current Lt Governor-led rule lacks democratic accountability.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.