PolityGovernance
News 32 of 34

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Quarterly DPC Meetings Under Article 14 & 16, Declares Consideration for Promotion a Fundamental Right

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
30 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Quarterly DPC meetingsArticles 14 & 16(1)May 8, 2017 (Punjab Govt instructions)Section 71(2) of Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976
Bodies:Punjab and Haryana High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a judgment by Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, has ruled that the right to be considered for promotion is a fundamental right under Articles 14 and 16(1).

2.The court directed the state to hold Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings every three months (quarterly) to ensure timely promotions and prevent employee stagnation.

3.This judgment clarifies the legal distinction: while an employee has a fundamental right to be considered for promotion, they do not have a vested right to be promoted, as reiterated by other High Courts in the article.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has declared that the right to be considered for promotion is a fundamental right under Articles 14 and 16(1) of the Constitution. The court has mandated that the state hold Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings every three months to prevent employee stagnation, setting a significant precedent for timely career progression in government services.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
JusticeJustice Harpreet Singh Brar
DPC Meeting Frequency OrderedEvery three months (Quarterly)
Constitutional BasisArticles 14 & 16(1)
Key Legal DistinctionRight to consideration is fundamental; promotion is not a vested right
Related State ActPunjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976
Petitioner's PostJunior Engineer (O&M) (Civil)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
  • ›Justice: Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
  • ›Target this Data: 'Quarterly' (every three months) DPC meetings.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Punjab and Haryana High Court (Justice Harpreet Singh Brar).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Articles 14 & 16(1) - Right to consideration for promotion is a fundamental right.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment is based on which Articles of the Constitution of India?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment:

1. It declared that getting a promotion is a fundamental right of every government employee.

2. It directed that Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings must be held every six months.

3. It cited that delayed DPCs cause financial loss and adversely impact future career progression of employees.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order, how frequently must the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) meetings be held?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal distinction established by the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, as reinforced by other High Courts mentioned in the article?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Regularisation from 2003 Under Article 14 Equality Clause

The Punjab and Haryana High Court reinforced the principle that administrative inaction cannot strip a worker of accrued rights under a valid regularisation policy. The court ordered the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board to regularise a daily-wage employee from 2003, applying Article 14's equality mandate. This judgment is crucial for understanding labour jurisprudence, the concept of 'model employer', and the enforceability of government policies.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

Punjab Refuses Consent for HC Chief Justice Appointment; MoP Breach Raises Judicial Appointment Process Concerns

Punjab's refusal to consent to Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra's appointment as Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana HC exposes a loophole in the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) for judicial appointments. The episode underscores the need for defined timelines for state responses in judicial appointments, a key issue for UPSC Polity and Governance.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Voter Roll Integrity Crisis: Right to Vote vs Software, Form 6 Changes Under Scrutiny

An Indian Express investigation reveals that two Election Commissioners objected to key decisions on electoral rolls, raising constitutional questions about the right to vote being subordinated to software and bureaucratic rules. The article, written by RJD MP in Rajya Sabha, warns against the 'bureaucratisation of citizen’s right to vote' and highlights the 97 Goa voters left out due to software limitations.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

AP High Court Declares Three-Capitals Petitions Infructuous; Amaravati Now Sole Capital Under AP Reorganisation (Amendment) Act 2026

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has deemed all petitions against the proposed three-capitals model as infructuous after Parliament amended the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, making Amaravati the sole capital by law. This ends a long-standing political and legal battle, with implications for state governance and federal structure.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.