PolitySocial Justice
News 6 of 24

Punjab & Haryana HC: Widows in Karewa Marriage to Deceased Husband's Brother Retain Family Pension Under Article 21

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
10 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:March 7, 2026
Bodies:Punjab and Haryana High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that 'karewa' marriage (widow marrying brother-in-law) does not disqualify her from receiving family pension.

2.Justice Harpreet Singh Brar held that the right to life under Article 21 includes a dignified life, and 'karewa' aids in social and financial rehabilitation of widows.

3.The court differentiated 'karewa' from general remarriage, stating it does not sever ties with the deceased husband's family, thus not violating the legislative intent of pension rules.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that a widow who enters into a 'karewa' marriage (remarriage to her deceased husband's brother) does not forfeit her family pension. The court held that such customary marriages serve a social purpose and are not 'remarriage' as envisaged by service rules, thus upholding her right to a dignified life under Article 21.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
JudgeJustice Harpreet Singh Brar
Date of OrderMarch 7, 2026
Constitutional ArticleArticle 21 (Right to Life)
Relevant Legal ProvisionSection 7, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
  • ›Judge: Justice Harpreet Singh Brar
  • ›Target this Data: March 7, 2026 (Date of the High Court order)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Punjab and Haryana High Court (Justice Harpreet Singh Brar)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life) and Section 7 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article, cited in the judgment, guarantees the right to life and personal liberty?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Punjab and Haryana High Court's judgment on 'karewa' marriage:

1. The court ruled that 'karewa' marriage is equivalent to remarriage as per service rules, leading to disqualification from family pension.

2. The judgment cited the Supreme Court case of DK Nakara v. Union of India to establish that pension is a form of deferred wages.

3. The court held that the right to family pension is a fundamental right flowing directly from Article 21 of the Constitution.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Punjab and Haryana High Court deliver the judgment in question?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary social purpose of 'karewa' marriage, as recognized by the Punjab and Haryana High Court?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Regularisation from 2003 Under Article 14 Equality Clause

The Punjab and Haryana High Court reinforced the principle that administrative inaction cannot strip a worker of accrued rights under a valid regularisation policy. The court ordered the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board to regularise a daily-wage employee from 2003, applying Article 14's equality mandate. This judgment is crucial for understanding labour jurisprudence, the concept of 'model employer', and the enforceability of government policies.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Releases 2 Life Convicts Citing Chekhov; SRB Rejection 'Arbitrary' Under Article 21

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of two life-term convicts, holding that prolonged imprisonment 'kills slowly' and that Sentence Review Boards cannot reject early release pleas based on stereotyped reasoning. The judgment reinforces Article 21 rights and sets important guidelines for evaluating post-conviction conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Waqf Board Proposes Revised Nikahnama Aligned with UCC; Interfaith Marriages under Special Marriage Act

Over 1.5 years after Uttarakhand implemented the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), the State Waqf Board has proposed a revised nikahnama to bring Muslim marriage registrations in line with the new law. The proposal bans conversions solely for marriage and mandates interfaith couples to register under the Special Marriage Act, marking a significant step in UCC implementation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.