PolityEconomy
News 12 of 23

Finance Act 2026 Retrospective Amendments to Income Tax Act 1961 Challenged in Madras HC for Violating Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245, 246

PolityEconomySUPPORT
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
14 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:June 1, 20072009April 1, 2021October 1, 2019Sections 4,8,9,12,13,32,33Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245, 246
Bodies:Madras High CourtRevenue Bar Association (RBA)Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.A writ petition challenges Sections 4, 8, 9, 12, 13, 32, and 33 of the Finance Act, 2026 for constitutional validity.

2.The challenged provisions amended the Income Tax Act, 1961 with retrospective effect, some dating back to June 1, 2007.

3.The petition argues violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245, 246, the separation of powers, and Entry 82 of the Union List.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Revenue Bar Association has filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court challenging the constitutional validity of specific sections of the Finance Act, 2026. The challenge is based on the retrospective insertion of new provisions into the Income Tax Act, 1961, dating back to 2007, allegedly violating fundamental rights, separation of powers, and the basic structure doctrine.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Court & BenchMadras High Court; First Division Bench of CJ Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Justice G. Arul Murugan
Petition Hearing DateJune 15, 2026
Retrospective Date (Earliest)June 1, 2007
Challenged ArticlesArticles 14, 19(1)(g), 245, 246

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court & Bench: Madras High Court; First Division Bench of CJ Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Justice G. Arul Murugan
  • ›Petition Hearing Date: June 15, 2026
  • ›Target this Data: The earliest retrospective date is June 1, 2007 (for Section 4 amendment).
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Revenue Bar Association (RBA) filed the petition in the Madras High Court.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The petition challenges violations of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245, 246 and the Basic Structure Doctrine.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which High Court is hearing the writ petition filed by the Revenue Bar Association challenging the Finance Act, 2026?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional challenge to the Finance Act, 2026:

1. The petition challenges the constitutional validity of specific sections that inserted provisions into the Income Tax Act, 1961 with retrospective effect.

2. The petition argues that the amendments violate Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) of the Constitution.

3. One of the grounds for the challenge is that the provisions are contrary to the doctrine of separation of powers.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the news, from which date is the amendment introduced by Section 4 of the Finance Act, 2026 deemed to have come into effect?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is a primary constitutional doctrine, other than violation of specific articles, cited in the petition against the Finance Act, 2026 provisions?

All 25 MCQs ▸
Read original article from The Hindu
You finished this topic
Practice 3 MCQs from this newsNext Article
Explore Related Topics
PolityView Topic MCQs →EconomyView Topic MCQs →
PreviousSC Upholds SIR of Electoral Rolls, Directs Citizenship Adjudication for 4 Weeks Before Next PollsNext India Cooling Action Plan Aims for 20-25% Demand Reduction, 25-30% Refrigerant Cut by 2037-38 Under Kigali Amendment
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Tata Trusts’ 66% Stake & Affirmative Voting Rights under Articles 104B, 121: SC Verdict Explained

Tata Trusts, holding about 66% of Tata Sons, are challenging the reappointment of N Chandrasekaran as executive chairman, citing the affirmative voting rights of their nominee directors under the Articles of Association. The Supreme Court’s 2021 Tata-Mistry judgment upheld these special rights, making it the key legal backdrop to the current boardroom dispute. For exams, this news tests corporate governance, fiduciary duties, and the binding force of a company’s Articles.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC: No Sanction Needed Under BNSS Section 218 for Disproportionate Assets Cases

The Madras High Court has ruled that no prior sanction is required under Section 197 CrPC or Section 218 BNSS to prosecute public servants for disproportionate assets, because such an offence has no nexus with official duty. The ruling, which refused to discharge former DMK Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam and his family, clarifies a key examiner-relevant dimension of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds NCLAT Order Setting Aside CCI's ₹301.6 Cr Penalty on Grasim

The Supreme Court upheld the NCLAT order setting aside CCI's ₹301.6 crore penalty on Grasim Industries for alleged abuse of dominance in the viscose staple fibre market. The Court affirmed that CCI violated natural justice by not providing a hearing after differing from the Director General's findings.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC Directs TN Chief Secretary to Form Panel on POCSO, Juvenile Justice Gaps

The Madras High Court has directed the Tamil Nadu government to form a committee of Home, Health, and Law Secretaries to address systemic gaps in implementing the POCSO and Juvenile Justice Acts. The court made key suggestions including gender-neutral application of POCSO, avoiding criminalizing consensual adolescent relationships, and establishing protocols for medical termination of pregnancy and child witness deposition rooms. This is crucial for UPSC aspirants as it touches upon child rights, judicial activism, and state governance.

Polity Current Affairs

PM CARES Fund: Donations Fall to ₹479.96 Cr, Balance Hits Record ₹8,452 Cr; No Questions in Lok Sabha

PM CARES Fund, a public charitable trust set up in 2020 for COVID-19 relief, saw donations plunge to ₹479.96 crore in FY2024-25 while its closing balance hit a record ₹8,452.06 crore. Spending fell to a five-year low of ₹87.85 lakh. The PMO has informed Lok Sabha that questions on PM CARES, PMNRF, and NDF are not admissible under parliamentary rules as they are funded by voluntary contributions, not from the Consolidated Fund of India.

Polity Current Affairs

₹1,700 Cr Donations to 6 RUPPs: Need for De-Registration Powers to EC

An investigation revealed that six Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) in Gujarat received ₹1,700 crore in donations in 2023-24, exceeding the combined donations of all national parties except the BJP. This highlights regulatory gaps that allow RUPPs to be used as conduits for tax evasion and money laundering. The article examines the need for the Election Commission to have de-registration powers and suggests a vote threshold for tax exemptions to curb misuse.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliament Passes Mines and Minerals Amendment Act 2026 Overriding SC Ruling, Extinguishes Rs 2 Lakh Cr Dues

The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2026 restricts states from imposing specified levies on mineral rights and extinguishes ~Rs 2 lakh crore in unpaid dues. Mineral-rich states like Odisha and Jharkhand oppose it as a blow to federal fiscal autonomy, potentially losing thousands of crores annually. This reverses the financial impact of a landmark 2024 Supreme Court ruling that had empowered states to tax mineral-bearing lands.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on CAPF Act 2026 Challenged for Violating Articles 14, 16, 21

The Supreme Court has questioned the constitutional validity of the Central Armed Police Forces (General Administration) Act, 2026, which mandates IPS officer deputation to senior CAPF posts, potentially overriding a 2025 SC judgment. This case tests the separation of powers and the rights of CAPF cadre officers under Articles 14, 16, and 21.

Start Today's Quiz(25 Qs)