PolityGovernance
News 12 of 33

Delhi HC Lays Down Right to Be Forgotten Framework Under Article 21, DPDP Act Gap Highlighted

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
09 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:May 29, 2026Article 21DPDP Act 2023Section 12GDPR Article 17Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India
Bodies:Delhi High CourtSupreme Court of IndiaNational Law University Delhi
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Delhi HC in Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India (May 29, 2026) held that right to be forgotten flows from Article 21's guarantee of dignity and informational privacy.

2.Court prescribed a structured proportionality test: legitimate purpose, balance harm vs public interest, least intrusive means (masking names not deleting judgments), two-week compliance deadline for legal databases.

3.DPDP Act 2023's section 12 provides only consent-based erasure, does not address judicial records; rules not notified and data protection board not fully effective.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Delhi High Court in May 2026 established a structured framework for the right to be forgotten, balancing privacy under Article 21 against open justice. The DPDP Act 2023 offers limited erasure rights, not covering judicial records. Enforcement remains challenging due to search engine design and lack of data protection board.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Key Judgment DateMay 29, 2026
Lead CaseLaksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India
Constitutional BasisArticle 21 (right to privacy)
DPDP Act ProvisionSection 12 (limited right to erasure)
International PrecedentGDPR Article 17 (right to erasure)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Key Judgment Date: May 29, 2026
  • ›Lead Case: Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India
  • ›Target this Data: May 29, 2026 — date of Delhi HC judgment on right to be forgotten
  • ›Target this Case: Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India — lead petition in batch of 30+
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (informational privacy) and DPDP Act 2023 Section 12

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Article of the Indian Constitution is the foundation for the right to be forgotten as recognized by the Delhi High Court in May 2026?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. The Delhi High Court in Laksh Vir Singh Yadav v. Union of India held that the right to be forgotten is a facet of Article 21.

2. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 provides a comprehensive right to erasure covering all types of personal data including judicial records.

3. The court prescribed that the least intrusive means to enforce the right is typically to mask names rather than delete the entire judgment.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Delhi High Court deliver the ruling on the right to be forgotten in the batch of petitions led by Laksh Vir Singh Yadav?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary challenge identified in the article for effective enforcement of the right to be forgotten in India?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Releases 2 Life Convicts Citing Chekhov; SRB Rejection 'Arbitrary' Under Article 21

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of two life-term convicts, holding that prolonged imprisonment 'kills slowly' and that Sentence Review Boards cannot reject early release pleas based on stereotyped reasoning. The judgment reinforces Article 21 rights and sets important guidelines for evaluating post-conviction conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

Health Ministry Backs Same-Sex Partners' Medical Decision Rights Under Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

The Union Health Ministry has told the Delhi High Court that excluding same-sex partners from making medical decisions for each other solely based on sexual orientation is unethical. This marks a significant administrative shift, though the government maintains that 'spouse' under Indian marriage laws only applies to heterosexual couples, creating a nuanced legal landscape for exam aspirants.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Directs Formulation of SOP for Arresting Transgender Persons; NHRC Advisory 2.0 Referred

The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre and Delhi Police to formulate a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the arrest, detention, search, and interrogation of transgender persons, citing a critical legal vacuum. The court relied on the NHRC's 'Advisory for Ensuring the Welfare of Transgender Persons, 2.0' issued in May 2026, and highlighted a specific incident of rights violation. This is a key development for Polity & Social Justice syllabus, focusing on fundamental rights (Article 21), the Transgender Persons Act, and the role of NHRC.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Upholds NMC Rule Barring Foreign Medical Grads with Multi-College Degrees from FMGE

The Delhi High Court has upheld the National Medical Commission's decision to bar Indian students who obtained medical degrees after studying across multiple foreign institutions from appearing in the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination (FMGE). The court ruled that such 'fragmented education' compromises medical quality and is not in public interest, reinforcing the need for embassy attestation of foreign degrees.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Seals 20 Madrasas Under New Minority Education Act; USAME Replaces Madrasa Board

Uttarakhand has sealed 20 unrecognised madrasas under a new regulatory framework that replaced its statutory Madrasa Board with the Uttarakhand State Authority for Minority Education (USAME). The move, backed by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling upholding state regulation of minority institutions while protecting Article 30 rights, signals a shift toward standardised education in minority-run schools. Aspirants must connect this to Article 21A, RTE Act, and the ongoing debate between minority autonomy and state regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Quashes Railway Board Decision, Upholds UDID Card for 45% Locomotor Disability

The Delhi High Court has set aside the Railway Board's cancellation of a UPSC ESE candidate's candidature, ruling that a valid UDID card certifying 45% locomotor disability cannot be overruled by a medical board. This judgment reinforces the legal sanctity of disability certificates under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and is a landmark for PwD recruitment in government services.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).