PolityGovernance
News 30 of 33

Sabarimala Review: Kerala Seeks SC Balance on Article 25 & 26 Ahead of April 2026 Hearing

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
16 Feb 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:April 2026
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Kerala Law Minister P. Rajeeve stated the state will seek an 'optimal balance' between religious practices (Article 26) and constitutional rights (Article 25) as the Supreme Court reviews its 2018 judgment.

2.The government highlighted the 'complex legal conundrums' and will not simply withdraw its 2018 affidavit, which had suggested forming an expert commission, to protect devotees' interests.

3.The political context is crucial as the issue resurfaces in an election year, with opposition parties accusing the government of betraying Ayyappa devotees.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

Kerala government is re-calibrating its stance on the Sabarimala women's entry issue ahead of a crucial Supreme Court hearing in April 2026. The core legal challenge is balancing Article 25 (freedom of religion) with Article 26 (right of religious denominations to manage affairs), a classic Polity topic essential for UPSC and State PSC aspirants.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Key ArticlesArticle 25 & Article 26
SC HearingApril 2026
Kerala Law MinisterP. Rajeeve
Core Legal QuestionEssential Religious Practice vs. Constitutional Rights

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Key Articles: Article 25 & Article 26
  • ›SC Hearing: April 2026
  • ›Target this Data: Supreme Court hearing scheduled for April 2026.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (hearing review petitions).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The interplay and distinction between Article 25 and Article 26 of the Constitution.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Sabarimala temple case involves the interpretation of which part of the Indian Constitution?

Q2Statement-basedMedium

Consider the following statements regarding the Sabarimala case:

1. Article 25 guarantees freedom of religion subject to public order, morality, and health.

2. Article 26 grants religious denominations the right to manage their own affairs in matters of religion.

3. The Supreme Court's 2018 verdict upheld the ban on women of menstruating age entering the Sabarimala temple.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

According to the news, when is the Supreme Court scheduled to hear the review petitions in the Sabarimala women's entry case?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional dilemma highlighted by the Kerala government's stance on the Sabarimala issue?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Govt to SC: Only Parliament Can Extend Creamy Layer to SC/ST; Cites Article 341, E V Chinnaiah Case

The government has told the Supreme Court that extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST is a policy decision for Parliament alone. This reaffirms that reservation for SC/ST is based on historical social criteria, not just economic status, and the creamy layer concept currently applies only to OBCs.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's March 11 Creamy Layer Judgment: Centre Seeks Clarification for 100 OBC CSE-2025 Candidates

Centre has approached SC seeking clarification on its March 11 judgment that ruled income cannot be the sole criterion for creamy layer among OBCs. The plea concerns 100 candidates selected in CSE since 2016 but rejected due to creamy layer criteria. The government warns retrospective application could disrupt CSE-2025 training and allocation.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Seeks SC Exemption for CSE 2025, 2026 from OBC Creamy Layer Income Test Retroactivity

The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to keep CSE 2025 and 2026 out of the Rohith Nathan judgment's retrospective operation, allowing the older OBC creamy layer income test to continue. It warns that retrospective application would hit 3.7 lakh OBC recruitments since 2016 and trigger widespread litigation across Railways, Banks, Posts and paramilitary.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Questions FSSAI's Two-Phase FoPL Rollout, Seeks Timeline & Nutritional Literacy in Schools by Sep 28

The Supreme Court has directed the FSSAI to provide a clear timeline for its two-phase front-of-pack warning label rollout and to consider an alternative model based on nutrient thresholds. The Court also asked the Centre to introduce nutritional literacy in school curricula. This is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves judicial oversight on food safety regulation, public health policy, and education reform.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.