PolityGovernance
News 5 of 31

SC Hears Constitutional Challenge to Places of Worship Act 1991, Freezing Religious Character as of August 15, 1947

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
18 Feb 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:August 15, 19471991
Bodies:Supreme CourtArchaeological Survey of India (ASI)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court hears petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, which freezes the status of religious places as of August 15, 1947.

2.Challenges argue the Act violates federalism (State subject), right to judicial review, and is arbitrary for using 1947 as a cut-off, while defenders cite the 2019 Ayodhya verdict upholding it as essential for secularism.

3.The legal pendency has allowed district courts to order surveys (like at Gyanvapi) to 'ascertain' religious character, interpreting that the Act bars conversion but not investigation.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court is hearing constitutional challenges to the Places of Worship Act, 1991, a critical law that freezes the religious character of all places of worship as they existed on August 15, 1947. This case tests the balance between secularism, federalism, and religious rights, with major implications for historical disputes like Gyanvapi and Bhojshala.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Act & YearPlaces of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991
Cut-off DateAugust 15, 1947
Lead PetitionerAshwini Kumar Upadhyay
Key ExceptionRam Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Act & Year: Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991
  • ›Cut-off Date: August 15, 1947
  • ›Target this Data: The cut-off date in the Places of Worship Act, 1991 is August 15, 1947.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Supreme Court of India is hearing the constitutional challenge.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 4(2) of the Act abates all pending legal proceedings regarding conversion of a place of worship.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which schedule of the Indian Constitution are the legislative subjects 'Pilgrimage' and 'Public Order' listed, as cited in the challenge to the Places of Worship Act?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991:

1. It freezes the religious character of all places of worship as it existed on August 15, 1947.

2. It bars the courts from entertaining any fresh suits or legal proceedings regarding the conversion of a place of worship.

3. The Act explicitly excludes the dispute related to the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi from its purview.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What is the specific cut-off date mandated by the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, for determining the religious character of a place of worship?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is a primary argument used by defenders of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, as highlighted in the Supreme Court's 2019 Ayodhya verdict?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.

Polity Current Affairs

Anoop Baranwal Principle vs Prescription: SC Split on Referral of CEC Appointment Act Challenge

The Supreme Court's two-judge bench split on whether to refer the challenge to the 2023 CEC Appointment Act to a Constitution Bench. Justice Datta held that the Anoop Baranwal principle (appointments free from exclusive executive control) is binding, while the specific committee composition (including CJI) was advisory; thus the challenge raises only application, not interpretation. Justice Sharma disagreed, citing need for independent examination. This debate is crucial for understanding the constitutional independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

SC to Examine Constitutional Validity of Treating English as Non-Indigenous Under CBSE's Three-Language Policy (NEP 2026-27)

The Supreme Court has raised a critical constitutional question: can English be classified as a 'non-indigenous' language under the CBSE's three-language policy (NEP 2026-27)? The court questioned the colonial undertones of the term 'native' and highlighted English's deep roots in Indian society, signaling a potential re-examination of language policy in education.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI SIR Process: 93% Inclusion Rate in WB Appeals; SC Hearing on Voter Deletions in Delhi & WB

The ECI's SIR process has led to massive disenfranchisement in West Bengal and Delhi. With only 3.2% of appeals disposed and 93% of those restored, the process is deeply flawed. The Supreme Court is hearing petitions; this has major implications for electoral integrity and universal adult franchise.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Mandates Hearing, Fixed Timelines for Remission; 30-Day Appeal, 14-Yr Custody Rule

The Patna High Court has laid down directions to make remission and premature release transparent and time-bound. Key reforms include a hearing before remission withdrawal, fixed deadlines for reports (15/30/15 days), a 30-day appeal mechanism, and a dedicated portal for tracking life convicts. This affects the Bihar Prison Manual, 2012 and sets a precedent for prison reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC: No Sanction Needed Under BNSS Section 218 for Disproportionate Assets Cases

The Madras High Court has ruled that no prior sanction is required under Section 197 CrPC or Section 218 BNSS to prosecute public servants for disproportionate assets, because such an offence has no nexus with official duty. The ruling, which refused to discharge former DMK Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam and his family, clarifies a key examiner-relevant dimension of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Issues Notice on BCI's Conflict of Interest in Regulating and Owning Law Universities

The Supreme Court has questioned the Bar Council of India's authority to regulate legal education, noting that the BCI is a regulator of the legal profession, not an expert in legal education. The Court issued notice on a petition alleging conflict of interest as BCI owns law universities through its trust.