PolityGovernance
News 15 of 17

Rajasthan HC Quashes ₹1,000 RTI Fee for Answer Sheets, Upholds RTI Rules 2012 Cap of ₹10 as 'Arbitrary' Violation

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
09 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:₹1,000 fee quashed₹10 RTI application fee cap2014 (fee reduction year)
Bodies:Rajasthan High CourtRajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Rajasthan High Court quashed Rajasthan University of Health Sciences' (RUHS) demand of ₹1,000 as a processing fee per answer sheet under RTI, calling it 'arbitrary' and 'not justified'.

2.The Court held the fee was in direct violation of the RTI Act and the RTI Rules, 2012, which fix the application fee at ₹10 and specify fees for providing information.

3.The ruling strengthens student rights to transparency, prevents public authorities from imposing excessive charges, and underscores that RTI Act provisions override any conflicting university guidelines.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Rajasthan High Court's landmark judgment reaffirms the supremacy of the RTI Act, protecting students from arbitrary fees. It quashed a university's ₹1,000 processing fee for answer sheets, declaring it a direct violation of the RTI Rules 2012. This ruling is crucial for exam aspirants as it reinforces transparency in public examinations and limits discretionary charges by public authorities.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Fee Quashed₹1,000 processing fee per answer sheet
Court BenchJustices Pushpendra Singh Bhatti and Sandeep Shah
RTI Application Fee Cap (Rules 2012)₹10
University InvolvedRajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS)
Year of University's Fee Decision2014 (reduced from ₹2,000 to ₹1,000)
Student's CourseBSc Nursing

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Fee Quashed: ₹1,000 processing fee per answer sheet
  • ›Court Bench: Justices Pushpendra Singh Bhatti and Sandeep Shah
  • ›Target this Data: RTI application fee is capped at ₹10 as per RTI Rules, 2012.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: RTI Act, 2005, and Rules of 2012 override conflicting university guidelines.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Article of the Constitution does a High Court exercise its writ jurisdiction, as used by the student in this case?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Rajasthan High Court judgment on RTI fees:

1. The Court quashed the Rajasthan University of Health Sciences' guideline charging a processing fee of ₹1,000 per RTI application for answer sheets.

2. The Court held that the university's fee was justified under Section 7 of the RTI Act, which allows for charging the cost of providing information.

3. The judgment upheld that the RTI Rules of 2012, which cap the application fee at ₹10, occupy the field and override any conflicting university regulations.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the RTI Rules, 2012, what is the maximum application fee that can be charged for filing an RTI application?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal significance of the Rajasthan High Court's judgment quashing the ₹1,000 RTI fee?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Rajasthan HC: Govt Employee Resigning to Contest Polls Cannot Seek Reinstatement Under CCS Rules 2021

The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a government employee who voluntarily resigns to contest assembly elections cannot claim reinstatement after losing the election, as contesting polls does not constitute a 'material change in circumstances' under Rule 26(5) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021. The judgment upholds the mandatory principle of political neutrality for civil servants under the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajasthan HC: Judicial Infrastructure Constitutional Duty, Not Govt Favour; Cites Article 21

The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that providing adequate judicial infrastructure is a constitutional duty of the state, not a favour. The court rejected financial constraints as an excuse, linking infrastructure to Article 21 (right to life and liberty), and ordered restoration of its Jodhpur building's Central Dome, which IIT Bombay found to be in imminent danger of collapse.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Judge Sandeep Mehta Seeks Transfer of Rajasthan HC Acting CJ, Alleges CJI Ignored Clear Evidence of Favouritism

Supreme Court Judge Justice Sandeep Mehta has written three letters to the CJI in August 2026, seeking immediate transfer of Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, citing clear evidence of favouritism, maladministration, and retributive actions against judges. This rare internal judiciary conflict raises critical questions about judicial independence, collegium functioning, and accountability mechanisms within the higher judiciary.

Polity Current Affairs

Gujarat HC Quashes Demolition Order of Waqf Qabarstan, Upholds Statutory Right of Appeal

The Gujarat High Court quashed a demolition order against a century-old Muslim burial ground (Qabarstan) in Bhavnagar, ruling that the revenue authority violated the Waqf committee's statutory right to appeal under the Land Revenue Code by issuing a removal notice before the 90-day appeal window had even begun. This case is a critical reminder of procedural due process in property and religious rights matters.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Collegium Divided on Acting Chief Justice's Power to Appoint HC Judges - 2026 Case

The Supreme Court Collegium faces a recurring question: can Acting Chief Justices of High Courts recommend names for judicial appointments? The controversy over Rajasthan HC's Acting CJ Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma's recommendations has revived the debate, with the Collegium divided on whether to accept such names or insist on a permanent Chief Justice. This has implications for the independence and efficiency of judicial appointments.

Polity Current Affairs

CIC Directs CBSE to Charge RTI Fees for Answer Scripts, Upholds Section 22 Override

CIC has ruled that CBSE must charge photocopying fees strictly as per RTI Rules, 2012, and recommended amending its May 2025 circular that barred revaluation for students who obtained answer sheets under RTI. The decision reinforces the overriding effect of Section 22 of the RTI Act over institutional rules.

Polity Current Affairs

Chhattisgarh HC Rules Religious Institutions Cannot Function as Courts; Quashes Shariya Court Triple Talaq Order

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that no religious institution can assume the authority of a court established by law, striking down a Shariya court's triple talaq order. This reinforces the constitutional supremacy of the legal system over personal religious practices, a critical issue for UPSC Polity and Social Justice.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Rules Cinema Halls Private Property, Upholds Food Pricing Freedom in Multiplexes

The Supreme Court's 2023 ruling in KC Cinema vs JK holds multiplexes as private property, allowing owners to set food prices and ban outside food. Despite public outcry over exorbitant prices (popcorn ₹340-₹570), the Legal Metrology Department can only check MRP compliance, not fix prices.