PolityGovernance
News 16 of 22

SC Bars Recording & Sharing of Live-Streamed Proceedings; Cites Misuse on Social Media

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
24 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Interim order July 24, 2026Bench: CJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi & V MohanaPIL by Harshita Grover
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaHigh Courts
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC bars posting, reposting, extraction, modification, dissemination, monetisation, recording or review of its live-streamed proceedings without prior permission of court registrar/secretary general.

2.Order does not affect news reporting; clarifies curb on digital platforms only.

3.PIL by journalist Harshita Grover highlights selective clipping and decontextualised circulation harming reputation of judges and litigants.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has issued an interim order banning the recording, sharing, and monetisation of its live-streamed proceedings on social media without prior permission. This move, triggered by a PIL citing misuse through selective clipping and AI-driven manipulation, impacts how judicial transparency tools are regulated in the digital age.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

BenchCJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi & V Mohana
PIL Filed ByJournalist Harshita Grover
Key Concern RaisedAI tools can alter spoken words while preserving lip movements
ExemptionNews reporting not affected

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench: CJI Surya Kant, Justices Joymalya Bagchi & V Mohana
  • ›PIL Filed By: Journalist Harshita Grover
  • ›Target this Data: Interim order dated July 24, 2026, by 3-judge bench led by CJI Surya Kant
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India; concerned registrar and secretary general for permissions
  • ›Target this Legal Point: PIL filed by journalist Harshita Grover; order does NOT affect news reporting

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional body issued the interim order barring recording and sharing of its live-streamed proceedings without permission?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's interim order:

1. The order bars posting, reposting, extraction, modification, dissemination, monetisation, recording or review of live-streamed proceedings on social media without prior permission.

2. The order applies to all court proceedings including those of High Courts and trial courts.

3. The order does not affect news reporting of court proceedings.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

Who filed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that led to the Supreme Court's interim order on recording court proceedings?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary concern raised in the PIL regarding live-streamed court proceedings?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Clarifies July 31 Order: Media Can Report Proceedings But Cannot Use Audio-Video Clips

The Supreme Court clarified that news outlets can report court proceedings but cannot use audio or video clips in their reports. This balances open justice with preventing misuse of selective clips. Key for understanding judicial transparency and media regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Maharashtra Panel Recommends BNS Amendment for Social Media Defamation After 11 Years of 66A

A Maharashtra government committee has recommended amending the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to specifically criminalize defamatory social media posts, 11 years after the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the IT Act. The move aims to tackle online defamation while incorporating safeguards against misuse, but faces legal scrutiny over potential conflict with free speech rights under Article 19(1)(a).

Polity Current Affairs

Maharashtra Panel Recommends BNS Amendment for Defamatory Social Media Posts; Shreya Singhal Precedent

A Maharashtra government panel has recommended amending the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to specifically criminalize defamatory social media posts, reviving the spirit of the now-struck-down Section 66A of the IT Act. This raises critical constitutional questions about balancing free speech (Article 19(1)(a)) with the right to reputation (Article 21), especially after the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A in Shreya Singhal vs Union of India (2015) for vagueness and overbreadth. For exam aspirants, understanding the legal framework of defamation, the concept of reasonable restrictions, and the proportionality standard is crucial.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Death by Hanging: Cites Stare Decisis, No Scientific Evidence for Lethal Injection

The Supreme Court has upheld hanging as the sole method of execution in India, dismissing a PIL that challenged its constitutional validity. The Court relied on the principle of stare decisis, citing a 1983 precedent and a lack of conclusive scientific evidence favoring lethal injection. This judgment reinforces the legal status quo on capital punishment but leaves the door open for future challenges.

Polity Current Affairs

Justice Liberhan Commission: Babri Masjid Demolition Was a Well-Planned Civil Conspiracy

Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, head of the one-man Commission of Inquiry into the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition, passed away. His 2009 report concluded the demolition was a meticulously planned civil conspiracy involving RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal, BJP, and Shiv Sena — a finding he never retracted despite the 2020 CBI court acquittals.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Telangana MLA Danam Nagender Disqualification Under Anti-Defection Law (Tenth Schedule)

Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of Telangana MLA Danam Nagender for defecting from BRS to Congress. The court rejected the 'ghar wapsi' argument, reinforcing that voluntarily giving up party membership under the Tenth Schedule cannot be condoned by claiming regret. This judgment reaffirms judicial review over Speaker's decisions in anti-defection cases.

Polity Current Affairs

Mahanadi Water Dispute: Odisha-Chhattisgarh CMs Meet July 30, 2026; Tribunal Gives Final Chance by April 20, 2026

After a decade-long legal battle, the Chief Ministers of Odisha and Chhattisgarh met on July 30, 2026 under Union Jal Shakti Minister C.R. Patil to resolve the Mahanadi water dispute amicably within three months. The Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal (MWDT) had earlier given a final opportunity on April 20, 2026 for a consensus, failing which it would proceed with adjudication. This is crucial for understanding inter-state river water disputes, cooperative federalism, and the ISRWD Act, 1956.

Supreme Court bars recording,…, Current Affairs for Exams