PolityGovernance
News 28 of 30

SC Seeks Response on Aadhaar Misuse as Citizenship Proof, Cites Section 9 of Aadhaar Act, 2016

PolitySUPPORT
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
16 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Section 9 of Aadhaar Act, 2016UIDAI Notification August 22, 2023Section 23(4) of RPA, 1950Article 14 of Constitution
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaUnique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)Election Commission of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice V. Mohana issued notices to the Centre, States, and UTs on a plea to restrict Aadhaar's use to identity proof only.

2.The plea argues that using Aadhaar for voter registration (Form-6) violates Section 9 of the Aadhaar Act, 2016, and could allow illegal immigrants into the electoral database.

3.The petition seeks a high-powered committee, including a retired SC judge and experts, to overhaul the electoral verification framework.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has issued notices to the Centre and States on a plea seeking to restrict Aadhaar's use strictly to proof of identity, preventing its misuse as proof of citizenship or domicile. This case revisits the foundational legal principle of Aadhaar and has direct implications for electoral integrity and government service delivery.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

SC BenchCJI Surya Kant & Justice V. Mohana
PetitionerAdvocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay
Key Legal ProvisionSection 9, Aadhaar Act, 2016
Notification Date CitedUIDAI Notification, August 22, 2023

1-Minute Revision

  • ›SC Bench: CJI Surya Kant & Justice V. Mohana
  • ›Petitioner: Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay
  • ›Target this Data: 'Section 9 of the Aadhaar Act, 2016' - the exact section that states Aadhaar is not proof of citizenship.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: 'Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)' - the statutory authority issuing Aadhaar.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The plea links misuse to violations of 'Section 23(4) of the RPA, 1950' and 'Article 14 of the Constitution'.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which ministry does the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) function?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the plea discussed in the news:

1. The plea was filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay seeking to restrict Aadhaar's use to proof of identity only.

2. The plea argues that using Aadhaar for school admissions and property purchases is in accordance with the UIDAI notification of August 2023.

3. The Supreme Court bench hearing the matter comprises Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice V. Mohana.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the plea cited in the article, which specific section of the Aadhaar Act, 2016, states that Aadhaar is not evidence of citizenship or domicile?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary concern raised by the petition regarding the use of Aadhaar in the electoral registration process (Form-6)?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds EC's SIR, Citizenship Under MHA; 13 Crore Deletions, Aadhaar Alternative Proposed

The Supreme Court upheld the EC's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which deleted over 13 crore names, but clarified that citizenship determination is solely under the Ministry of Home Affairs. This raises critical debates on voter rights, due process, and the viability of Aadhaar-based verification as a cost-effective, inclusive alternative to house-to-house surveys.

Polity Current Affairs

TN Withdraws RTI Exemption for Law and Order Dept Under Section 24(4); 2,000+ Citizens Seek CJI Intervention on SIR

Tamil Nadu government withdrew its controversial order exempting the Public (Law and Order) Department from the RTI Act after widespread backlash. Separately, over 2,000 citizens have written to the Chief Justice of India to stay the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and initiate suo motu proceedings against the Election Commission's conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Allocates Symbols Under Symbols Order 1968: TMC Split Triggers Para 15 Dispute Resolution

The Election Commission's power to allocate symbols and resolve intra-party disputes is a core UPSC topic. This article covers the Symbols Order 1968, how symbols are reserved/free, and the recent TMC split case. It also connects to the appointment of ECs (Article 324, 2023 Act, SC split verdict), making it high-yield for both Prelims and Mains.

Polity Current Affairs

CEC Removal Procedure Matches SC Judge; 2023 Act Appointment Panel Challenged Under Anoop Baranwal

Opposition demands CEC removal after leaked objections. CEC removal requires special majority in both Houses (same as SC judge), making it politically difficult. Meanwhile, the 2023 Act for appointing CEC/ECs, which replaced CJI with a Cabinet Minister, faces a split verdict in the Supreme Court. This touches Article 324, the Anoop Baranwal judgment, and independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Election Commission's SIR Deletes 13 Crore Names from Draft Rolls; Raises Questions on Population & Voting Rights

The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has led to the deletion of 13 crore names from draft rolls, including nearly one-third of Delhi's electorate. This article by a former Chief Election Commissioner uses satire to highlight the absurdity of treating electoral roll deletions as a solution to India's population problem, while drawing parallels with the Assam NRC and warning of potential disenfranchisement of eligible citizens.

Polity Current Affairs

EC Data: 22.21 Lakh West Bengal Excluded Voters Filed SIR Appeals in SC

The Election Commission revealed in the Supreme Court that over 22.21 lakh voters excluded during West Bengal's electoral roll revision have appealed their removal. This case is crucial for understanding the EC's powers, electoral roll accuracy, and the judicial oversight of election processes—key topics for UPSC Polity and State PSC exams.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Urges West Bengal Speaker to Decide Disqualification Petitions by Oct 8 Under Tenth Schedule

The Supreme Court has directed the West Bengal Assembly Speaker to decide disqualification petitions against 10 rebel MLAs by October 8, reinforcing the 'reasonable time' principle from the Keisham Meghachandra Singh judgment. This case highlights the tension between Speaker-led adjudication under the Tenth Schedule and the EC's interim orders, a recurring theme in anti-defection law.

Polity Current Affairs

Telangana's Khairatabad Seat Vacant After Danam Nagender Disqualified Under Anti-Defection Law

The Telangana Legislative Assembly has officially notified the disqualification of BRS MLA Danam Nagender from the Khairatabad constituency after the Supreme Court upheld the High Court order under anti-defection law. The seat is now vacant, and the Election Commission will announce a by-election schedule.