PolityGovernance
News 1 of 23

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Life Support for 32-Year-Old Under Passive Euthanasia Framework, Urges Govt to Enact Law

PolitySocial IssuesCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
11 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Over 13 years32 years30-day consideration period
Bodies:Supreme CourtAIIMS DelhiDelhi High CourtUnion Government
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court, for the first time, applied its passive euthanasia framework from the 2018 'Common Cause' judgment, permitting the withdrawal of Clinically Assisted Nutrition from a patient in a persistent vegetative state.

2.The Court issued administrative directions to streamline the procedure, asking High Courts to ensure judicial magistrates are intimated and the Union government to maintain panels for secondary medical boards.

3.The ruling distinguishes between illegal active euthanasia (culpable homicide) and permissible passive euthanasia (withdrawal of futile treatment), rooted in the right to live with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has applied its 2018 passive euthanasia guidelines for the first time, allowing the withdrawal of life support for a 32-year-old man in a persistent vegetative state for 13 years. This landmark application underscores the evolving right to die with dignity under Article 21 and highlights the urgent need for a comprehensive parliamentary law on end-of-life care.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Patient's Age32 years (Harish Rana)
Time in Vegetative StateOver 13 years (since 2013)
Bench JusticesJustices J B Pardiwala and K V Vishwanathan
Key Legal FrameworkCommon Cause (2018) judgment

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Patient's Age: 32 years (Harish Rana)
  • ›Time in Vegetative State: Over 13 years (since 2013)
  • ›Target this Data: First application of the passive euthanasia framework (2026).
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (bench of Justices Pardiwala & Vishwanathan).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life includes right to die with dignity) and the Common Cause (2018) judgment.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Supreme Court's directive to admit the patient to its palliative care department was issued to which institution?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's judgment on passive euthanasia:

1. The Court applied the legal framework established in the 2018 'Common Cause' judgment for the first time.

2. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is permitted only after assessment and certification by a single medical board.

3. The Court waived the usual 30-day consideration period as all stakeholders, including the medical boards and the patient's family, were unanimous.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

For how many years had Harish Rana been in a persistent vegetative state before the Supreme Court's order?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional basis for permitting passive euthanasia (withdrawal of life support) in India, as highlighted in the news?

All 25 MCQs ▸
Read original article from Indian Express
You finished this topic
Practice 3 MCQs from this newsNext Article
Explore Related Topics
PolityView Topic MCQs →Social IssuesView Topic MCQs →
Next IndiaAI Mission: ₹10,372 Cr Outlay for Sovereign AI, Targets 2 Lakh GPUs Under 7-Pillar Strategy
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds NCTE Notice: TEIs Must File Annual Appraisal Reports Under RTE Act

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) to require all Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs) to file annual Performance Appraisal Reports. This judgment reinforces the regulatory power of NCTE, links the RTE Act's academic authority provisions, and expands the concept of 'duty-bearers' to include TEIs and NCTE itself. For exam aspirants, this is a key case in education governance, statutory interpretation, and fundamental rights.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment on Sex Work: Article 142, Consent, and Rights Framework

The Supreme Court in May 2026 delivered a landmark judgment on sex work, holding that consenting adult sex workers cannot be forcibly rescued and affirming their constitutional rights despite social disapproval. The judgment invokes Article 142 for legal force, spans nearly 300 pages, and departs from global anti-trafficking assumptions, but raises concerns about institutional implementation and caste discrimination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Independently Investigate Sex Determination Cases Under PC&PNDT Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot independently investigate offences under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. Only the Appropriate Authority, a specialised body under the Act, can investigate. Police may assist but cannot take over the investigation, and any separate criminal offences (IPC/BNS) can be investigated independently. This clarifies a long-standing legal confusion and is crucial for understanding the enforcement mechanism of this social legislation.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Seeks SC Exemption for CSE 2025, 2026 from OBC Creamy Layer Income Test Retroactivity

The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to keep CSE 2025 and 2026 out of the Rohith Nathan judgment's retrospective operation, allowing the older OBC creamy layer income test to continue. It warns that retrospective application would hit 3.7 lakh OBC recruitments since 2016 and trigger widespread litigation across Railways, Banks, Posts and paramilitary.

Start Today's Quiz(25 Qs)