PolityGovernance
News 3 of 22

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
19 Aug 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:1978Bangalore Water Supply vs A RajappaIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947Industrial Relations Code, 2020Nine-judge benchCJI Surya Kant
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court nine-judge bench reserved verdict on scope of 'industry' under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2.The 1978 Bangalore Water Supply ruling had broadly defined 'industry' to include non-profit and welfare activities.

3.Key questions include whether welfare schemes and sovereign functions fall outside labour law ambit.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Landmark CaseBangalore Water Supply vs A Rajappa (1978)
Current Bench9 judges (CJI Surya Kant)
Key ActIndustrial Disputes Act, 1947
Reference CaseState of UP vs Jai Bir Singh (2005)
Legislative DevelopmentIndustrial Relations Code, 2020

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Landmark Case: Bangalore Water Supply vs A Rajappa (1978)
  • ›Current Bench: 9 judges (CJI Surya Kant)
  • ›Target this Data: 1978 (Bangalore Water Supply case)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court (Nine-judge bench under CJI Surya Kant)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (definition of industry)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Act is the term 'industry' defined, the scope of which is being reconsidered by the Supreme Court?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court case on the definition of 'industry':

1. The current nine-judge bench is reconsidering the 1978 Bangalore Water Supply ruling.

2. The 1978 ruling was delivered by a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court.

3. The case also examines whether the Industrial Relations Code, 2020 has any bearing on the definition.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

How many judges are part of the Supreme Court bench hearing the case on the definition of 'industry'?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary concern of labour unions in the ongoing Supreme Court case regarding the definition of 'industry'?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC’s Nine-Judge Bench Split: ‘Industry’ Definition Retains 1978 Triple Test for Pending Cases

A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court delivered a fractured verdict on what constitutes an 'industry' under labour law. The judges agreed that pending cases under the repealed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 will continue to be decided under the 1978 'triple test' from Bangalore Water Supply case. The new Industrial Relations Code, 2020 must be interpreted independently, and the ruling does not extend the old jurisprudence forward.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Independently Investigate Sex Determination Cases Under PC&PNDT Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot independently investigate offences under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. Only the Appropriate Authority, a specialised body under the Act, can investigate. Police may assist but cannot take over the investigation, and any separate criminal offences (IPC/BNS) can be investigated independently. This clarifies a long-standing legal confusion and is crucial for understanding the enforcement mechanism of this social legislation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment on Sex Work: Article 142, Consent, and Rights Framework

The Supreme Court in May 2026 delivered a landmark judgment on sex work, holding that consenting adult sex workers cannot be forcibly rescued and affirming their constitutional rights despite social disapproval. The judgment invokes Article 142 for legal force, spans nearly 300 pages, and departs from global anti-trafficking assumptions, but raises concerns about institutional implementation and caste discrimination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules 1978 'Industry' Definition Not Binding on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench ruled that the 1978 landmark precedent defining 'industry' will not automatically apply to the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This severs the worker-friendly expansive interpretation, creating a clean slate for future labour disputes under the new code.