PolitySocial Justice
News 20 of 26

Chhattisgarh HC Allows Divorce Under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 for ST Couple Following Hindu Rites

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
06 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Section 2(2) of Hindu Marriage ActSection 13B of Hindu Marriage ActArticle 13(3)(a)Article 342Marriage Year: 2009
Bodies:Chhattisgarh High CourtFamily Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that a Scheduled Tribe (ST) member following Hindu customs can avail divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2.The Court held Section 2(2) of the Act is a protective measure, not an exclusion, allowing ST individuals to voluntarily submit to its jurisdiction.

3.The judgment is crucial for examiners as it intertwines personal laws, constitutional protection for STs under Article 342, and judicial interpretation of legal provisions.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

Chhattisgarh High Court clarified that Scheduled Tribe members who voluntarily adopt Hindu customs can seek divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The ruling underscores that Section 2(2) of the Act is a protective measure, not an exclusionary one, allowing ST individuals to opt into the Act's provisions.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtChhattisgarh High Court
BenchJustices Sanjay K Agrawal & Arvind Kumar Verma
Date of JudgmentFebruary 3
Act InvokedHindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section for DivorceSection 13B (Divorce by Mutual Consent)
Exempting SectionSection 2(2)
Constitutional Articles CitedArticle 13(3)(a) & Article 342
Marriage Year2009

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Chhattisgarh High Court
  • ›Bench: Justices Sanjay K Agrawal & Arvind Kumar Verma
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 2(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
  • ›Target this Constitutional Provision: Article 342 for Scheduled Tribes & Article 13(3)(a) for 'custom or usage'.
  • ›Target this Judicial Body: Chhattisgarh High Court (Bench: Justices Sanjay K Agrawal & Arvind Kumar Verma).
  • ›Target this Key Concept: 'Protection vs. Exclusion' interpretation of Section 2(2).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article empowers the President to specify the Scheduled Tribes for a state or union territory?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Chhattisgarh High Court judgment:

1. The court held that Section 2(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is a measure of protection for tribal customary laws, not exclusion.

2. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Justices Sanjay K Agrawal and Arvind Kumar Verma.

3. The court ruled that a Scheduled Tribe member can never seek remedies under the Hindu Marriage Act, even if married according to Hindu rites.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

Under which section of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was the couple's petition for divorce by mutual consent filed?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary legal principle established by the Chhattisgarh High Court in this judgment?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Chhattisgarh HC Rules Shariyat Court Cannot Legally Dissolve Marriage; Triple Talaq Order Set Aside

Chhattisgarh High Court held that a Shariyat Court's declaration of triple talaq (Talaq-e-Hasan) has no legal authority. The judgment reinforces the supremacy of constitutional law over religious decrees, a crucial topic for UPSC mains on secularism and Uniform Civil Code.

Polity Current Affairs

Chhattisgarh HC Rules Religious Institutions Cannot Function as Courts; Quashes Shariya Court Triple Talaq Order

The Chhattisgarh High Court has ruled that no religious institution can assume the authority of a court established by law, striking down a Shariya court's triple talaq order. This reinforces the constitutional supremacy of the legal system over personal religious practices, a critical issue for UPSC Polity and Social Justice.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC Calls for Amendment to Section 15 Hindu Marriage Act: Right to Marry is Human Right

The Madras High Court has urged Parliament to amend Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act, recommending that a spouse appealing a divorce decree must obtain an interim stay within two months, or the other spouse should be free to remarry. The Court held that the right to marry is a human right and prolonged appeals should not leave remarriage uncertain for years.

Polity Current Affairs

Karnataka HC Upholds Rs 15 Lakh Alimony: Able-Bodied Husband Must Maintain Wife Even Without Income

Karnataka High Court affirmed Rs 15 lakh permanent alimony, ruling that an able-bodied husband cannot escape maintenance by claiming no income. The court emphasized strict adherence to Rajnesh vs Neha guidelines requiring both parties to disclose assets and liabilities before determining alimony.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Hindu Man Can Adopt Own Illegitimate Son under Hindu Adoptions Act, 1956

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that a Hindu man can adopt his own biological child born out of wedlock under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, provided statutory requirements are met. This clarifies the distinction between capacity to give and take a child in adoption, and has implications for inheritance and property rights.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Waqf Board Proposes Revised Nikahnama Aligned with UCC; Interfaith Marriages under Special Marriage Act

Over 1.5 years after Uttarakhand implemented the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), the State Waqf Board has proposed a revised nikahnama to bring Muslim marriage registrations in line with the new law. The proposal bans conversions solely for marriage and mandates interfaith couples to register under the Special Marriage Act, marking a significant step in UCC implementation.

Polity Current Affairs

J&K HC Allows 11-Year-Old Sexual Assault Victim to Terminate Pregnancy Beyond 24-Week MTP Limit Under Article 226

The J&K High Court allowed an 11-year-old rape victim to terminate her pregnancy even after the statutory 24-week limit under the MTP Act, citing constitutional protection under Article 226 and the Supreme Court's recent ruling in S vs Union of India. This landmark judgment affirms that statutory timelines cannot override fundamental rights of minors and sexual assault survivors.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC: Muslim Personal Law Marriage Cannot Immunize Sexual Assault of Minor Under POCSO Act, BNS

Delhi HC held that a marriage valid under Muslim personal law does not confer immunity from POCSO and BNS for sexual intercourse with a minor wife. The court refused to quash FIR against a 28-year-old man who married a 16-year-old girl, emphasizing that consent of a minor is irrelevant and Parliament has not provided marital exception in POCSO.

Can tribal man seek divorce under…, Current Affairs for Exams