The Central Information Commission (CIC) ruled in May 2026 that the BCCI is not a 'public authority' under the RTI Act, reversing its 2018 order. The ruling hinges on Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, which defines public authority by constitutional/legal establishment or government control/financing, not by performance of public functions. This revives the debate over transparency obligations of influential private bodies and is crucial for understanding the RTI Act's scope and related Supreme Court judgments.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›CIC Ruling Date: May 2026
- ›BCCI Registration: Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975
- ›Target this Data: CIC ruling date: May 2026; BCCI registered under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Central Information Commission (CIC) – quasi-judicial body under RTI Act.
- ›Target this Legal Point: Section 2(h) of RTI Act, 2005 – definition of public authority; Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank v State of Kerala (2013) on 'control' and 'substantial financing'.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.