PolityGovernance
News 15 of 33

CIC Rules BCCI Not Public Authority Under RTI Act, Revives Debate on Section 2(h)

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
09 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:May 2026Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975Section 2(h) RTI ActThalappalam Service Cooperative Bank v State of Kerala (2013)Zee Telefilms v Union of India (2005)2018 CIC ruling (M Sridhar Acharyulu)
Bodies:Central Information CommissionBoard of Control for Cricket in IndiaSupreme Court of IndiaMadras High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.CIC in May 2026 held BCCI is not a public authority under RTI Act, as it is a private society registered under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, not subject to meaningful government control.

2.Section 2(h) of RTI Act defines public authority through constitutional/legal establishment or being owned/controlled/substantially financed by government; performing public functions alone is insufficient.

3.Key SC judgments – Thalappalam (2013) on 'control' and 'substantial financing', Zee Telefilms (2005) on BCCI not being 'State' – guided the CIC's decision.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Central Information Commission (CIC) ruled in May 2026 that the BCCI is not a 'public authority' under the RTI Act, reversing its 2018 order. The ruling hinges on Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, which defines public authority by constitutional/legal establishment or government control/financing, not by performance of public functions. This revives the debate over transparency obligations of influential private bodies and is crucial for understanding the RTI Act's scope and related Supreme Court judgments.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CIC Ruling DateMay 2026
BCCI RegistrationTamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975
Key SC Judgment on ControlThalappalam Service Cooperative Bank v State of Kerala (2013)
Relevant SectionSection 2(h), RTI Act, 2005
Previous CIC Ruling (reversed)2018 (M Sridhar Acharyulu held BCCI as public authority)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›CIC Ruling Date: May 2026
  • ›BCCI Registration: Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975
  • ›Target this Data: CIC ruling date: May 2026; BCCI registered under Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Central Information Commission (CIC) – quasi-judicial body under RTI Act.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 2(h) of RTI Act, 2005 – definition of public authority; Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank v State of Kerala (2013) on 'control' and 'substantial financing'.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Act is the definition of 'public authority' primarily governed for the purpose of transparency obligations?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the CIC's May 2026 ruling on BCCI:

1. The CIC held that BCCI is a public authority under the RTI Act because it performs significant public functions like selecting the national cricket team.

2. The CIC relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank v State of Kerala (2013) to interpret 'substantial financing' and 'control'.

3. The ruling reversed a 2018 CIC decision that had declared BCCI a public authority.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

In which year did the Supreme Court deliver the judgment in Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank v State of Kerala, which was pivotal in interpreting 'substantial financing' under the RTI Act?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

Why did the CIC hold that BCCI is not a 'public authority' under the RTI Act, despite its role in regulating cricket and selecting the national team?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Stays HC Order Declaring NSEI as 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act Section 2(h)

The Supreme Court has stayed a Delhi High Court order that declared the National Stock Exchange of India (NSEI) a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. This means citizens cannot currently enforce their right to information from NSEI. The case challenges whether a stock exchange, though controlled by the government, should be treated as a public authority.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC Rules Child Can Claim Reservation Through Mother, Rejects Patrilineal Caste Tracing

The Madras High Court has ruled that a child can claim Scheduled Caste (SC), Most Backward Class (MBC), or Other Backward Class (OBC) reservation benefits through their mother's nativity if the child is born and brought up in that community, rejecting the 'patriarchal society' argument. This landmark judgment links the core of reservation to social disadvantage, not lineage, and has direct implications for the interpretation of equality under Articles 14, 15, and 16 of the Constitution.

Polity Current Affairs

Madras HC: No Sanction Needed Under BNSS Section 218 for Disproportionate Assets Cases

The Madras High Court has ruled that no prior sanction is required under Section 197 CrPC or Section 218 BNSS to prosecute public servants for disproportionate assets, because such an offence has no nexus with official duty. The ruling, which refused to discharge former DMK Minister M.R.K. Panneerselvam and his family, clarifies a key examiner-relevant dimension of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Polity Current Affairs

TN Withdraws RTI Exemption for Law and Order Dept Under Section 24(4); 2,000+ Citizens Seek CJI Intervention on SIR

Tamil Nadu government withdrew its controversial order exempting the Public (Law and Order) Department from the RTI Act after widespread backlash. Separately, over 2,000 citizens have written to the Chief Justice of India to stay the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and initiate suo motu proceedings against the Election Commission's conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Delists 334 RUPPs; ₹11,813 Cr Tax Exemption Lost on Political Donations – Need for CAG Audit

Political parties in India enjoy unprecedented tax exemptions and opacity in donations. A recent BBC investigation and ADR report reveal that Registered Unrecognised Political Parties (RUPPs) received huge donations without contesting elections. The exchequer lost ₹11,813 crore in taxes over a decade. The Election Commission lacks power to deregister shell parties, and the author calls for mandatory CAG audit, expenditure limits, and a digital portal for financial transparency.

Polity Current Affairs

SC 9-Judge Bench Rules BWSSB Triple Test Not Binding for IRC 2020 Section 2(p)

The Supreme Court's 9-judge bench has held that the landmark 1978 'Triple Test' for defining 'industry' under the ID Act will not be a binding precedent for interpreting the identical provision in the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This could weaken worker protections just as more workers move to the private sector post-liberalisation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Centre Reply on PIL: Minors' Online Accounts Without Valid Contracts Under Section 11 Indian Contract Act

A PIL filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance has challenged the practice of allowing minors to independently sign up for digital platforms without verified parental consent. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre, highlighting the legal gap between Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act (barring minors from contracts) and existing IT/DPDP rules.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Telangana MLA Danam Nagender Disqualification Under Anti-Defection Law (Tenth Schedule)

Supreme Court upheld the disqualification of Telangana MLA Danam Nagender for defecting from BRS to Congress. The court rejected the 'ghar wapsi' argument, reinforcing that voluntarily giving up party membership under the Tenth Schedule cannot be condoned by claiming regret. This judgment reaffirms judicial review over Speaker's decisions in anti-defection cases.