PolityGovernance
News 3 of 19

Governor's Discretion Under Article 164: Sarkaria Commission & SC Precedents (S.R. Bommai, 1994) for Hung Assemblies

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
09 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Article 164Article 356Article 174(2)(b)
Bodies:Supreme CourtSarkaria CommissionCommittee of Governors
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Governor's power to appoint CM in a hung Assembly under Article 164 is not absolute but guided by conventions & SC rulings.

2.Sarkaria Commission hierarchy: 1. Pre-poll alliance, 2. Single largest party, 3. Post-poll alliance; floor test is key for objectivity.

3.SC in S.R. Bommai (1994) held a floor test as the most transparent method, preventing Governor's subjective satisfaction from overriding the House.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Governor's role in appointing a Chief Minister in a hung Assembly is guided by constitutional conventions and SC judgments like S.R. Bommai, not personal discretion. The primary aim is to ensure a stable government, with the floor test being the ultimate objective measure to ascertain majority, preventing misuse of power under Articles 164 and 356.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Constitutional Article for CM AppointmentArticle 164
Key Supreme Court CaseS.R. Bommai (1994)
Commission on Centre-State RelationsSarkaria Commission (1988)
Article for President's RuleArticle 356

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Constitutional Article for CM Appointment: Article 164
  • ›Key Supreme Court Case: S.R. Bommai (1994)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 164 for appointment of Chief Minister.
  • ›Target this Committee: Sarkaria Commission (1988) on Centre-State relations.
  • ›Target this Judgment: S.R. Bommai case (1994) on floor test and President's Rule.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Article of the Indian Constitution does the Governor appoint the Chief Minister of a State?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Governor's role in a hung Assembly:

1. The Sarkaria Commission recommended inviting the single largest party as the first option.

2. The Supreme Court in the S.R. Bommai case held that the floor test is the most objective way to ascertain majority.

3. The Governor can recommend President's Rule under Article 356 only after exploring all possibilities for government formation.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the Sarkaria Commission's order of preference for inviting a party to form government in a hung Assembly, what is the second option after the pre-poll alliance?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary objective of the Governor, as a constitutional head, in a situation of a hung Assembly?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

EC Decision-Making Under Scrutiny: Article 324, CEC Act 2023, Dissent Notes Explained

The Election Commission's internal dissent has come under the spotlight after two Election Commissioners recorded objections 14 times in 10 months. This raises critical questions about the functioning of a constitutional body, the balance between unanimity and majority decision-making, and the protection of dissenting voices — a core area for UPSC and State PSC exams.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC in Vihaan Kumar Reinforces Arrest Safeguards: Informing Grounds Mandatory Under Article 22(1), BNSS 2023

SC in Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana (2025) held that every arrested person must be directly and meaningfully informed of the grounds of arrest, and failure violates Article 22(1) and Section 50 CrPC (Section 47 BNSS). The verdict also links an unconstitutional arrest to illegal subsequent remand and reiterates Article 21 dignity. For exams, remember the case, the CrPC-to-BNSS section mapping, and the Arnesh Kumar arrest guidelines.