A nine-judge Supreme Court bench is adjudicating the constitutionality of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) practiced by the Dawoodi Bohra community. The case critically examines the conflict between religious freedom (Articles 25-26) and the fundamental right to life and bodily integrity (Article 21), with significant implications for child protection laws and India's international human rights obligations.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Bench Strength: Nine-Judge Supreme Court Bench
- ›Key Articles Tested: Articles 25, 26 vs Article 21
- ›Target this Data: The case is before a 'Nine-Judge' Supreme Court bench.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: The Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) affirmed FGM is a crime.
- ›Target this Legal Point: The legal conflict is between Articles 25-26 (Religious Freedom) and Article 21 (Right to Life).
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.