PolitySocial Issues
News 13 of 32

Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench Hears FGM Case; Tests Article 25-26 vs Article 21 on Child Rights

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
14 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Nine-Judge BenchArticles 25-26Article 21IPC 320-326Year 2018
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaMinistry of Women and Child Development
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.A nine-judge Supreme Court bench is hearing a landmark case to determine if Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is constitutionally protected under religious freedom (Articles 25-26).

2.The Union Government has previously affirmed FGM is a crime under IPC sections 320-326 and the POCSO Act, but the SC's 2018 referral framed it primarily as a religious rights issue.

3.The legal test hinges on whether a cultural practice, even if claimed as integral to religion, can override the fundamental right to life, bodily autonomy, and dignity of a child.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench is adjudicating the constitutionality of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) practiced by the Dawoodi Bohra community. The case critically examines the conflict between religious freedom (Articles 25-26) and the fundamental right to life and bodily integrity (Article 21), with significant implications for child protection laws and India's international human rights obligations.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench StrengthNine-Judge Supreme Court Bench
Key Articles TestedArticles 25, 26 vs Article 21
Community InvolvedDawoodi Bohra
IPC Sections CitedSections 320-326
Referred in Year2018

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench Strength: Nine-Judge Supreme Court Bench
  • ›Key Articles Tested: Articles 25, 26 vs Article 21
  • ›Target this Data: The case is before a 'Nine-Judge' Supreme Court bench.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) affirmed FGM is a crime.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The legal conflict is between Articles 25-26 (Religious Freedom) and Article 21 (Right to Life).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Union Ministry, as per the article, affirmed that Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a crime under the IPC and POCSO Act?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court case on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM):

1. The case is being heard by a nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court.

2. The primary legal question framed by the Court is whether FGM is protected under the right to freedom of religion (Articles 25-26).

3. The practice of FGM is explicitly mentioned and mandated in the core scriptures of Islam.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the article, under which sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) did the Ministry of Women and Child Development state that Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a penal offence?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the core constitutional principle, as per the article's argument, that should prevent Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) from being protected as a religious practice?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC 9-Judge Bench Rules BWSSB Triple Test Not Binding for IRC 2020 Section 2(p)

The Supreme Court's 9-judge bench has held that the landmark 1978 'Triple Test' for defining 'industry' under the ID Act will not be a binding precedent for interpreting the identical provision in the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This could weaken worker protections just as more workers move to the private sector post-liberalisation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment on Sex Work: Article 142, Consent, and Rights Framework

The Supreme Court in May 2026 delivered a landmark judgment on sex work, holding that consenting adult sex workers cannot be forcibly rescued and affirming their constitutional rights despite social disapproval. The judgment invokes Article 142 for legal force, spans nearly 300 pages, and departs from global anti-trafficking assumptions, but raises concerns about institutional implementation and caste discrimination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules 1978 'Industry' Definition Not Binding on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench ruled that the 1978 landmark precedent defining 'industry' will not automatically apply to the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This severs the worker-friendly expansive interpretation, creating a clean slate for future labour disputes under the new code.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Election Commission's SIR Deletes 13 Crore Names from Draft Rolls; Raises Questions on Population & Voting Rights

The Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has led to the deletion of 13 crore names from draft rolls, including nearly one-third of Delhi's electorate. This article by a former Chief Election Commissioner uses satire to highlight the absurdity of treating electoral roll deletions as a solution to India's population problem, while drawing parallels with the Assam NRC and warning of potential disenfranchisement of eligible citizens.

When religious freedom collides…, Current Affairs for Exams