PolitySocial Justice
News 2 of 27

SC Mandates Victim Protection Plan Under Articles 21 & 23 for Human Trafficking Survivors in Prajwala v. Union of India

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
15 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:May 29, 2026Articles 21 & 23Up to 3 years
Bodies:Supreme Court of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC mandates a comprehensive Victim Protection Plan for human trafficking survivors, based on Articles 21 and 23.

2.The plan shifts the legal paradigm, treating survivors as rights-holders entitled to rehabilitation, not as offenders or charity cases.

3.The judgment highlights the need for State-level implementation frameworks and addresses gaps in rescue, shelter, and long-term support.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has issued landmark guidelines creating a comprehensive Victim Protection Plan for survivors of sex trafficking. This is a significant shift from viewing survivors as recipients of charity to recognizing them as rights-holders, directly impacting GS Paper II (Governance & Social Justice) and questions on Article 21 (Right to Life with Dignity) and Article 23 (Prohibition of Traffic in Human Beings).

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Case NamePrajwala v. Union of India
Judgment DateMay 29, 2026
Constitutional BasisArticles 21 & 23
Support DurationUp to 3 years

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Case Name: Prajwala v. Union of India
  • ›Judgment Date: May 29, 2026
  • ›Target this Case: Prajwala v. Union of India (May 29, 2026)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Victim Protection Plan based on Articles 21 & 23 of the Constitution.
  • ›Target this Principle: Shift from 'charity' to 'rights-holder' for trafficking survivors.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Supreme Court's Victim Protection Plan for trafficking survivors is primarily based on which articles of the Constitution?

Q2Statement-basedMedium

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's Victim Protection Plan for trafficking survivors:

1. The plan mandates that survivors must receive legal representation immediately after rescue.

2. The guidelines state that women who choose to leave shelters can be denied compensation and welfare benefits.

3. The judgment was delivered in the case of Prajwala v. Union of India on May 29, 2026.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

According to the Supreme Court's guidelines, for how long are designated caseworkers responsible for ensuring continued support to trafficking survivors?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is described as the unique and transformative aspect of the Supreme Court's Victim Protection Plan according to the activists quoted in the article?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Polity Current Affairs

CBSE Mandates Three Languages Including Two Native Indian Languages for Class 9 from July 2026

The Centre informed the Supreme Court it is working on implementing the CBSE's three-language policy, making two native Indian languages compulsory for Class 9 from July 2026. The policy aligns with NEP 2020, but faces challenges over implementation timelines and infrastructure, with the SC seeking a balanced solution.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Seals 20 Madrasas Under New Minority Education Act; USAME Replaces Madrasa Board

Uttarakhand has sealed 20 unrecognised madrasas under a new regulatory framework that replaced its statutory Madrasa Board with the Uttarakhand State Authority for Minority Education (USAME). The move, backed by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling upholding state regulation of minority institutions while protecting Article 30 rights, signals a shift toward standardised education in minority-run schools. Aspirants must connect this to Article 21A, RTE Act, and the ongoing debate between minority autonomy and state regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Health Ministry Backs Same-Sex Partners' Medical Decision Rights Under Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

The Union Health Ministry has told the Delhi High Court that excluding same-sex partners from making medical decisions for each other solely based on sexual orientation is unethical. This marks a significant administrative shift, though the government maintains that 'spouse' under Indian marriage laws only applies to heterosexual couples, creating a nuanced legal landscape for exam aspirants.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds EC's SIR, Citizenship Under MHA; 13 Crore Deletions, Aadhaar Alternative Proposed

The Supreme Court upheld the EC's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which deleted over 13 crore names, but clarified that citizenship determination is solely under the Ministry of Home Affairs. This raises critical debates on voter rights, due process, and the viability of Aadhaar-based verification as a cost-effective, inclusive alternative to house-to-house surveys.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Centre Reply on PIL: Minors' Online Accounts Without Valid Contracts Under Section 11 Indian Contract Act

A PIL filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance has challenged the practice of allowing minors to independently sign up for digital platforms without verified parental consent. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre, highlighting the legal gap between Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act (barring minors from contracts) and existing IT/DPDP rules.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Extends Section 498A (BNS Section 85) Protection to Live-In Partners 'In Nature of Marriage'

The Supreme Court has ruled that women in live-in relationships 'in the nature of marriage' are entitled to protection from domestic cruelty under Section 498A IPC (now Section 85 BNS). This landmark judgment extends criminal law safeguards beyond formal marriage, recognizing that domestic abuse stems from power imbalance, not marital status.