PolitySocial_Issues
News 25 of 25

Punjab and Haryana HC: Adults Below Marriage Age Have Right to Live with Partner of Choice Under Article 21

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
30 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Article 21June 25, 2026Born Oct 2006Born Jan 2007
Bodies:Punjab and Haryana High CourtHaryana Police
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Punjab and Haryana HC directed police to protect a live-in couple where both partners were major but below marriageable age.

2.Court held that the right to life and liberty under Article 21 includes the right to choose a partner, even in a live-in relationship.

3.Judgment relied on earlier coordinate bench rulings in Jashanpreet Kaur and Pardeep Singh cases.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that adults below the legal marriageable age have the right to live with a partner of their choice, including in a live-in relationship, and are entitled to police protection of life and liberty under Article 21. This judgment reinforces the constitutional right to choose a partner, even if the relationship does not meet marriage age requirements.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
JudgeJustice Vikas Bahl
Date of OrderJune 25, 2026
Key Constitutional ArticleArticle 21 (Right to Life and Liberty)
Petitioners' AgesBorn Oct 2006 and Jan 2007 (both major, below marriage age)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
  • ›Judge: Justice Vikas Bahl
  • ›Target this Data: Judgment date - June 25, 2026; Court - Punjab and Haryana HC; Judge - Justice Vikas Bahl
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Punjab and Haryana High Court
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 - Right to life and liberty includes right to choose partner

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which High Court delivered the judgment that adults below marriageable age have the right to live with a partner of their choice?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment:

1. The court held that the right to life and liberty under Article 21 includes the right to choose a partner.

2. The court declared that live-in relationships are legally equivalent to marriage.

3. The court directed the police to assess threat perception and protect the couple.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did Justice Vikas Bahl pronounce the judgment regarding the right of adults below marriage age to live with a partner of their choice?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal principle established by the Punjab and Haryana High Court in this judgment?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Regularisation from 2003 Under Article 14 Equality Clause

The Punjab and Haryana High Court reinforced the principle that administrative inaction cannot strip a worker of accrued rights under a valid regularisation policy. The court ordered the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board to regularise a daily-wage employee from 2003, applying Article 14's equality mandate. This judgment is crucial for understanding labour jurisprudence, the concept of 'model employer', and the enforceability of government policies.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Voter Roll Integrity Crisis: Right to Vote vs Software, Form 6 Changes Under Scrutiny

An Indian Express investigation reveals that two Election Commissioners objected to key decisions on electoral rolls, raising constitutional questions about the right to vote being subordinated to software and bureaucratic rules. The article, written by RJD MP in Rajya Sabha, warns against the 'bureaucratisation of citizen’s right to vote' and highlights the 97 Goa voters left out due to software limitations.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Releases 2 Life Convicts Citing Chekhov; SRB Rejection 'Arbitrary' Under Article 21

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of two life-term convicts, holding that prolonged imprisonment 'kills slowly' and that Sentence Review Boards cannot reject early release pleas based on stereotyped reasoning. The judgment reinforces Article 21 rights and sets important guidelines for evaluating post-conviction conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Waqf Board Proposes Revised Nikahnama Aligned with UCC; Interfaith Marriages under Special Marriage Act

Over 1.5 years after Uttarakhand implemented the Uniform Civil Code (UCC), the State Waqf Board has proposed a revised nikahnama to bring Muslim marriage registrations in line with the new law. The proposal bans conversions solely for marriage and mandates interfaith couples to register under the Special Marriage Act, marking a significant step in UCC implementation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.