PolityGovernance
News 27 of 30

Allahabad HC Allows WhatsApp Chats as Adultery Evidence Under Section 14, Family Courts Act, Sets Aside ₹10k Maintenance Order

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
26 Feb 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:₹10,000 per month
Bodies:Allahabad High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Allahabad HC allows WhatsApp chats as evidence of adultery in a maintenance case under Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, overriding strict Evidence Act requirements.

2.Court remands case back to trial court, setting aside its order directing husband to pay ₹10,000 monthly maintenance under CrPC Section 125.

3.The judgment highlights the Family Court's power to frame its own procedure and consider any evidence it deems relevant for effective dispute resolution.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Allahabad High Court's ruling clarifies that Family Courts have procedural flexibility under Section 14 of the Family Courts Act to admit electronic evidence like WhatsApp chats, even without a Section 65B Evidence Act certificate, for matrimonial disputes. This is critical for UPSC aspirants as it tests the interplay between procedural law, evidence law, and family law, a common examiner focus area.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Maintenance Amount Set Aside₹10,000 per month
Judicial AuthorityJustice Madan Pal Singh, Allahabad HC
CrPC Section for MaintenanceSection 125
Family Courts Act Section InvokedSection 14
Evidence Act SectionSection 65B

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Maintenance Amount Set Aside: ₹10,000 per month
  • ›Judicial Authority: Justice Madan Pal Singh, Allahabad HC
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
  • ›Target this Judicial Body: Allahabad High Court (Justice Madan Pal Singh).
  • ›Target this Legal Provision: CrPC Section 125 (Maintenance of wife, children, and parents).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which High Court recently allowed WhatsApp chats as evidence in a matrimonial dispute under Section 14 of the Family Courts Act?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Allahabad High Court judgment:

1. The court allowed WhatsApp chats as evidence of adultery without requiring a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act.

2. The judgment was delivered while hearing a criminal revision plea against a maintenance order passed under Section 125 of the CrPC.

3. The High Court directed the trial court to consider the evidence in light of Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What was the monthly maintenance amount that the Allahabad High Court set aside in its recent judgment?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal significance of the Allahabad High Court's reference to Section 14 of the Family Courts Act in this judgment?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes NSA Detention for Procedural Lapses under BNSS Section 126, Awards ₹5,000 Compensation

The Allahabad High Court quashed the NSA detention of Aakriti Chaudhary, a DU graduate, holding that the state concocted the story and violated procedural safeguards under BNSS Section 126. This reinforces judicial scrutiny of preventive detention laws and the importance of habeas corpus petitions.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Rules CCTV Footage Exempt Under RTI Section 8(1)(g), Cannot Be Provided Directly

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that CCTV footage cannot be directly provided to an applicant under the RTI Act as it is exempt under Section 8(1)(g). However, a court or commission can direct preservation and production of such footage after a complaint is filed. This clarifies the scope of RTI exemptions and the procedure for accessing sensitive information.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Public Employment is Public Trust; Unlawful Appointments Under Articles 14 & 16 Cannot Be Protected

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that public employment is a public trust, and appointments secured through deceit, misrepresentation, or abuse of judicial process cannot be protected. The court upheld the termination of a teacher whose appointment was found unlawful, and ordered recovery of salary and benefits received under interim court protection, reinforcing the constitutional mandate of equality under Articles 14 and 16.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes Goonda Act Externment Order, Flags Misuse by UP Govt

The Allahabad High Court has severely criticised the Uttar Pradesh government for misusing the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act as a tool of harassment. The court quashed an externment order against a man based on an acquitted case and an unverified beat report, highlighting violations of natural justice. This raises critical questions about the misuse of stringent state laws, relevant for understanding judicial review, preventive detention, and state policing in India.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Upholds Mandatory Govt Service Bond for Subsidised PG Medical Education

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that doctors who pursue subsidised PG medical education cannot evade the mandatory two-year government service bond, even if there is administrative delay in providing posting. The court held that the bond ensures availability of doctors in government hospitals and protects patients' right to life under Article 21.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Stays HC Order Declaring NSEI as 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act Section 2(h)

The Supreme Court has stayed a Delhi High Court order that declared the National Stock Exchange of India (NSEI) a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. This means citizens cannot currently enforce their right to information from NSEI. The case challenges whether a stock exchange, though controlled by the government, should be treated as a public authority.

Polity Current Affairs

TN Withdraws RTI Exemption for Law and Order Dept Under Section 24(4); 2,000+ Citizens Seek CJI Intervention on SIR

Tamil Nadu government withdrew its controversial order exempting the Public (Law and Order) Department from the RTI Act after widespread backlash. Separately, over 2,000 citizens have written to the Chief Justice of India to stay the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and initiate suo motu proceedings against the Election Commission's conduct.

Allowing WhatsApp chats as…, Current Affairs for Exams