PolityGovernance
News 2 of 24

SC Directs CBSE to Provide Opt-Out Option for APAAR ID; Privacy Concerns Under Article 21

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
20 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Orissa HC judgment Dec 12, 2025Article 21Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023Classes 9 to 12Board exams from 2026
Bodies:Supreme CourtCentral Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)Orissa High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court will order CBSE to comply with Orissa HC judgment directing opt-out/refusal option in APAAR consent form on pan-India basis.

2.Petitioners argued APAAR scheme violates children's privacy under Article 21 and DPDP Act 2023, and is coercively implemented.

3.Scheme is Aadhaar-linked, stored in DigiLocker, and CBSE has made it mandatory for Classes 9 to 12 board exams from 2026 onwards.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has assured parents it will pass an order requiring CBSE to implement the Orissa High Court's directive to include an opt-out/refusal option in the APAAR consent form pan-India. This addresses concerns that the Aadhaar-linked academic ID scheme was being enforced de facto mandatorily, raising privacy issues under Article 21.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

SC BenchCJI Surya Kant + Justice Joymalya Bagchi
Orissa HC JudgmentRohit Anand Das vs State of Odisha, Dec 12, 2025
Key Legal ChallengePrivacy under Article 21, DPDP Act 2023
Current StatusCBSE to provide opt-out option pan-India

1-Minute Revision

  • ›SC Bench: CJI Surya Kant + Justice Joymalya Bagchi
  • ›Orissa HC Judgment: Rohit Anand Das vs State of Odisha, Dec 12, 2025
  • ›Target this Data: Orissa HC judgment date - Dec 12, 2025
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: CBSE (Central Board of Secondary Education)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 - Right to Privacy

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article was cited by petitioners to argue that the APAAR scheme violates children's privacy?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. The Supreme Court will order CBSE to provide opt-out/refusal option in APAAR consent form on a pan-India basis.

2. The Orissa High Court judgment in Rohit Anand Das vs State of Odisha was delivered on December 12, 2026.

3. Petitioners argued that APAAR scheme violates provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the article, from which academic year onwards has CBSE made APAAR ID mandatory for students in Classes 9 to 12 to appear in Board examinations?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary concern raised by petitioners regarding the APAAR scheme?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Polity Current Affairs

Govt to SC: Only Parliament Can Extend Creamy Layer to SC/ST; Cites Article 341, E V Chinnaiah Case

The government has told the Supreme Court that extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST is a policy decision for Parliament alone. This reaffirms that reservation for SC/ST is based on historical social criteria, not just economic status, and the creamy layer concept currently applies only to OBCs.

APAAR Scheme: Supreme Court…, Current Affairs for Exams