PolityConstitution
News 16 of 25

Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 to Quash FIRs Against NEET-UG 2026 Protesters

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
02 Sept 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Article 142NEET-UG 2026September 1, 2026CJI Surya Kant
Bodies:Supreme Court of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court quashed FIRs against NEET protesters using Article 142.

2.The power is to do 'complete justice' and is absolute but subject to limitations.

3.This case involves the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) and NEET-UG 2026 paper leak.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court used its extraordinary power under Article 142 to quash FIRs against NEET-UG 2026 protesters, raising questions about the scope of 'complete justice' and judicial overreach. For aspirants: understand Article 142's expansive power and its constitutional limits.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Article Number142
Bench3-judge bench headed by CJI Surya Kant
Date of VerdictSeptember 1, 2026
Case ContextNEET-UG 2026 protest FIRs

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Article Number: 142
  • ›Bench: 3-judge bench headed by CJI Surya Kant
  • ›Target this Data: Article 142
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Doctrine of Complete Justice

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which article of the Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order for complete justice?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. Article 142 allows the Supreme Court to do complete justice.

2. Article 142 can override any existing law.

3. The power under Article 142 is absolute and unlimited.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

Who headed the three-judge bench that quashed FIRs using Article 142?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary purpose of Article 142 of the Constitution?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Science & Tech Current Affairs

ISRO Launches EOS-05: India's First Geo-Imaging Satellite in Geosynchronous Orbit; SC Invokes Article 142 to Quash CJP Protest Cases

A day of high exam relevance: ISRO successfully launched EOS-05, India’s first dedicated geo-imaging satellite in geosynchronous orbit, breaking a failure streak. The Supreme Court used its extraordinary power under Article 142 to close cases linked to CJP protests, raising important constitutional questions. Other key updates include OpenAI’s new autonomous AI model, Manipur’s NRC-first demand for Census deferral, mistrust in GDP data, and Tata Chemicals’ Kenya dispute.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules 1978 'Industry' Definition Not Binding on Industrial Relations Code, 2020

The Supreme Court's nine-judge Constitution Bench ruled that the 1978 landmark precedent defining 'industry' will not automatically apply to the new Industrial Relations Code, 2020. This severs the worker-friendly expansive interpretation, creating a clean slate for future labour disputes under the new code.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Social Issues Current Affairs

SC Awards ₹12 Lakh Compensation to Woman Denied Peon Job by IOC on Gender Grounds

The Supreme Court has ruled that excluding a woman candidate from a PSU job solely because she is a woman violates fundamental rights. This landmark judgment reinforces the constitutional guarantee of gender equality and non-discrimination in public employment, awarding ₹12 lakh compensation after 37 years of legal battle.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Uses Article 142 to Quash CJP Protest FIRs; 2,873 Individuals Excluded

The Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to quash thousands of FIRs filed during CJP protests, except for 2,873 individuals with serious criminal antecedents. This controversial use of 'complete justice' powers bypasses the statutory quashing procedure under BNSS, reigniting debate on judicial overreach. For aspirants, this is a critical case study on Article 142's scope and limitations.