PolityGovernance
News 16 of 24

Supreme Court Directs Blacklisting of 3 NCERT Experts Over Class VIII Textbook Content on Judicial Corruption

PolitySUPPORT
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
12 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Class VIII3 experts
Bodies:Supreme CourtNCERT
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court directed central/state governments and educational institutions to dissociate from three NCERT experts after taking exception to a Class VIII textbook section on judicial corruption.

2.The withdrawn textbook had referenced a speech by then-CJI B R Gavai from July 2025, where he acknowledged instances of corruption within the judiciary.

3.This case tests the limits of judicial intervention in academic content and the conflict between protecting institutional integrity and upholding freedom of expression, a key examiner angle.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

The Supreme Court's directive to blacklist three NCERT experts after objecting to textbook content on judicial corruption raises significant questions about judicial overreach and academic freedom. This case is crucial for understanding the balance between institutional dignity and freedom of expression, a recurring theme in Polity and Governance for UPSC.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Textbook ClassClass VIII Social Science
Number of Experts Blacklisted3
Key Speech ReferencedCJI B R Gavai's July 2025 speech

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Textbook Class: Class VIII Social Science
  • ›Number of Experts Blacklisted: 3
  • ›Target this Data: 3 NCERT experts were blacklisted.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India issued the directive.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Conflict with Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(a).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional body issued the directive to blacklist the NCERT experts mentioned in the news?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the news:

1. The Supreme Court objected to content in a Class VIII Social Science textbook.

2. The textbook content referenced a speech by a former Chief Justice of India.

3. The Court's directive applied only to central universities and not state institutions.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the news, how many NCERT experts were directed to be blacklisted by the Supreme Court?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the core constitutional principle most directly challenged by the Supreme Court's directive as discussed in the article?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

CBSE 3-Language Policy: SC Informed of Implementation Plan for Class 9 Students

The Supreme Court is reviewing the CBSE's new policy making three languages, including at least two Indian languages, compulsory for Class 9 students. The Centre has informed the court it is working on an implementation plan, addressing concerns about student pressure and infrastructure. This is a key test of the National Education Policy 2020's implementation in schools.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs RBI, States, CBI on Digital Arrest Scams: SOP, Kill Switch, ₹18 Cr Restored

The Supreme Court issued interim directions to combat digital arrest scams, including RBI SOP for banks, operationalization of grievance redressal and money restoration modules, and examination of a 'kill switch' for calls. The court noted a decline in reported fraud but stressed continued vigilance. This is crucial for understanding judicial activism in cybercrime and institutional coordination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs States to Revisit Raising Judicial Officers' Retirement Age to 61 in 2 Weeks

The Supreme Court has held that States cannot use financial burden as a valid ground to oppose enhancing the retirement age of judicial officers. It has directed all States/UTs to decide within two weeks, in consultation with High Courts, on allowing district judges to serve up to 61 years while a petition for uniform 62 years remains pending.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.