PolitySocial Issues
News 13 of 27

Cow Protection Laws in 20+ States Under Article 48, Yet Cattle Census Shows Only 49.63% Growth Since 1951

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
28 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:49.63% cow growth (1951-2019)153.8% buffalo growth (1951-2019)₹35,000 crore (2012-2019 WB farmer earnings)38.3% male cattle decline in Gujarat58.27% male cattle decline in UP22.8% male cattle decline in WB
Bodies:Supreme CourtCalcutta High CourtConstituent AssemblyJamiat Ulama-e-Hind
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Over 20 states have laws prohibiting cow slaughter, with Gujarat's 2017 law prescribing life imprisonment, while eight states (like Kerala and NE states) do not.

2.Cattle data shows cow population grew only 49.63% (1951-2019) vs. 153.8% for buffaloes, with states like UP and Gujarat seeing sharp declines in male cattle.

3.The Supreme Court in Mohd. Hanif Quareshi (1958) ruled cow slaughter is not an essential Islamic practice, and cow protection is a Directive Principle under Article 48.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

Despite over 20 states having stringent laws against cow slaughter, derived from Article 48 of the Constitution, cattle census data reveals a contradictory outcome: cow population has grown only 49.63% since 1951, compared to a 153.8% rise in buffaloes. This analysis explores the policy's economic impact on farmers and its efficacy, questioning whether legal prohibitions are achieving their stated goal of preservation.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

States with No Cow Slaughter LawsArunachal, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Manipur, Mizoram, Kerala
Cow Population Growth (1951-2019)49.63%
Buffalo Population Growth (1951-2019)153.8%
Decline in Male Cattle (2012-2019)Gujarat (-38.3%), Maharashtra (-31.4%), UP (-58.27%)
Constitutional BasisDirective Principle, Article 48

1-Minute Revision

  • ›States with No Cow Slaughter Laws: Arunachal, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Manipur, Mizoram, Kerala
  • ›Cow Population Growth (1951-2019): 49.63%
  • ›Target this Data: Cow population growth (49.63%) vs. Buffalo growth (153.8%) since 1951.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court (Mohd. Hanif Quareshi case, 1958 & K.S. Puttaswamy case, 2017).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 48 of the Constitution (Directive Principle for cow protection).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The provision for cow protection in the Indian Constitution is found under which Article?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding cow protection in India:

1. Over 20 states in India have laws that completely prohibit the slaughter of cows.

2. The Supreme Court, in the Mohd. Hanif Quareshi case, ruled that cow slaughter is an essential practice of the Islamic faith.

3. According to cattle census data cited in the article, the population of buffaloes in India has grown at a faster rate than that of cows since 1951.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the cattle census data mentioned in the article, what has been the percentage growth in India's cow population from 1951 to the latest census cited?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is a key economic argument presented in the article against stringent cow slaughter prohibition laws?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Social Issues Current Affairs

Bombay HC Overrules Trial Court in Tarun Tejpal Case: Victim's Past Sexual History Inadmissible

The Bombay High Court's ruling in the Tarun Tejpal case highlights persistent judicial bias against rape survivors, with courts focusing on victim's character instead of accused's conduct. Legal experts emphasize that the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 defines consent as positive agreement, yet patriarchal notions still influence rulings. For UPSC, this connects to judicial reforms, gender justice, and landmark cases like Mathura and Vishaka.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Contradictions within India’s cow…, Current Affairs for Exams