The Delhi High Court ruled that private media houses perform a 'public function' and can be sued via writ petition under Article 226 for violating fundamental rights like privacy. This landmark judgment extends the horizontal application of fundamental rights to the press, balancing press freedom with individual privacy, but raises concerns about a chilling effect on journalism.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Compensation Amount: Rs 5 lakh
- ›Legal Provision: Article 226
- ›Target this Data: Rs 5 lakh compensation for privacy violation, case from 2005, Kaushal Kishor judgment (2023)
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Delhi High Court (two-judge bench: Justice C Hari Shankar and Justice O P Shukla)
- ›Target this Legal Point: Article 226, horizontal application of fundamental rights, media as public function
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.