PolityGovernance
News 1 of 26

Delhi HC: Private Media Performs 'Public Function', Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 for Privacy Violation

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
06 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Rs 5 lakhArticle 226Kaushal Kishor (2023)2005 incidentJustice C Hari ShankarJustice O P Shukla
Bodies:Delhi High CourtSupreme CourtTV Today Network
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Delhi HC held that private media performs a public function, making it amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for violating fundamental rights.

2.The court applied the horizontal application of fundamental rights (from Kaushal Kishor 2023) specifically to the right to privacy against the press.

3.Upheld Rs 5 lakh compensation for broadcasting details of a minor sexual assault victim without consent, emphasizing consent and public interest.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Delhi High Court ruled that private media houses perform a 'public function' and can be sued via writ petition under Article 226 for violating fundamental rights like privacy. This landmark judgment extends the horizontal application of fundamental rights to the press, balancing press freedom with individual privacy, but raises concerns about a chilling effect on journalism.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Compensation AmountRs 5 lakh
Legal ProvisionArticle 226
Key PrecedentKaushal Kishor (2023) Constitution Bench
BenchJustice C Hari Shankar & Justice O P Shukla
Year of Incident2005

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Compensation Amount: Rs 5 lakh
  • ›Legal Provision: Article 226
  • ›Target this Data: Rs 5 lakh compensation for privacy violation, case from 2005, Kaushal Kishor judgment (2023)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Delhi High Court (two-judge bench: Justice C Hari Shankar and Justice O P Shukla)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 226, horizontal application of fundamental rights, media as public function

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional provision empowers High Courts to issue writs for enforcement of fundamental rights?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Delhi High Court judgment:

1. The court ruled that private media houses perform a 'public function' and can be taken to a High Court for violating an individual's right to privacy.

2. The Supreme Court's Kaushal Kishor judgment (2023) established the principle of horizontal application of fundamental rights against private individuals.

3. The court awarded Rs 10 lakh in compensation to the victim's mother for the privacy violation.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What was the amount of compensation upheld by the Delhi High Court in the case against TV Today Network for broadcasting details of a minor sexual assault victim?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary concern raised by legal experts regarding the Delhi High Court judgment on media as a public function?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Stays HC Order Declaring NSEI as 'Public Authority' Under RTI Act Section 2(h)

The Supreme Court has stayed a Delhi High Court order that declared the National Stock Exchange of India (NSEI) a 'public authority' under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. This means citizens cannot currently enforce their right to information from NSEI. The case challenges whether a stock exchange, though controlled by the government, should be treated as a public authority.

Polity Current Affairs

Delhi HC Releases 2 Life Convicts Citing Chekhov; SRB Rejection 'Arbitrary' Under Article 21

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of two life-term convicts, holding that prolonged imprisonment 'kills slowly' and that Sentence Review Boards cannot reject early release pleas based on stereotyped reasoning. The judgment reinforces Article 21 rights and sets important guidelines for evaluating post-conviction conduct.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds NCTE Notice: TEIs Must File Annual Appraisal Reports Under RTE Act

The Supreme Court has upheld the authority of the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) to require all Teacher Education Institutions (TEIs) to file annual Performance Appraisal Reports. This judgment reinforces the regulatory power of NCTE, links the RTE Act's academic authority provisions, and expands the concept of 'duty-bearers' to include TEIs and NCTE itself. For exam aspirants, this is a key case in education governance, statutory interpretation, and fundamental rights.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Rules BCI Cannot Discipline Law Students; Manipur Ethnic Violence Toll 306 Dead, 49 Missing Since 2023

A landmark Supreme Court ruling clarifies that the Bar Council of India (BCI) has no disciplinary authority over law students, limiting its powers under the Advocates Act, 1961 to registered advocates only. Meanwhile, Manipur's Home Minister disclosed in the Assembly that 306 people have been killed and 49 are missing in ethnic violence since May 2023. These two developments carry significant weight for UPSC Polity and Social Issues sections.