PolityGovernance
News 17 of 31

Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Complex Declared Saraswati Temple by MP High Court, Replaces 2003 ASI Arrangement

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
22 May 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:May 15, 20262003Nearly 1,800 security personnel721 years
Bodies:Madhya Pradesh High CourtSupreme Court of IndiaArchaeological Survey of India (ASI)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Madhya Pradesh High Court, in a May 15, 2026 judgment, declared the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex a Hindu temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati, overturning the ASI's 2003 arrangement for shared worship.

2.This led to the first 'Maha Aarti' by Hindu groups on a Friday under heavy security (1,800 personnel), while Muslim petitioners protested by praying at home and filed an appeal in the Supreme Court.

3.For exams, focus on the role of ASI, the constitutional responsibility for protected monuments, and the legal-judicial dynamics of resolving religious site disputes, as seen in similar cases like Ayodhya and Gyanvapi.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has fundamentally altered the religious status of the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex in Dhar, declaring it a Hindu temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati. This replaces the 2003 ASI arrangement that allowed shared worship, leading to heightened communal tensions and a security-heavy first 'Maha Aarti' under the new order. The case is now moving to the Supreme Court, making it a critical Polity and Indian Heritage topic.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

High Court Judgment DateMay 15, 2026
Previous ASI Arrangement Year2003
Security Personnel DeployedNearly 1,800
Claimed Historical Gap for Aarti721 years

1-Minute Revision

  • ›High Court Judgment Date: May 15, 2026
  • ›Previous ASI Arrangement Year: 2003
  • ›Target this Data: Year 2003 (for the previous ASI arrangement for Bhojshala).
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) - the body that manages the monument.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The constitutional responsibility of the state to preserve protected monuments.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex is a protected monument under the care of which national organization?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Bhojshala dispute:

1. The Madhya Pradesh High Court declared the religious character of the site to be that of a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati.

2. Prior to the High Court order, worship at the site was governed by a 2013 arrangement by the Archaeological Survey of India.

3. The High Court stated that the preservation of the site, as a protected monument, is the constitutional responsibility of the state.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the news article, in which year did the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) put in place the arrangement for shared worship at the Bhojshala complex that was recently overturned?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary constitutional principle invoked by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in its judgment on the Bhojshala complex?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Justice Liberhan Commission: Babri Masjid Demolition Was a Well-Planned Civil Conspiracy

Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, head of the one-man Commission of Inquiry into the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition, passed away. His 2009 report concluded the demolition was a meticulously planned civil conspiracy involving RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal, BJP, and Shiv Sena — a finding he never retracted despite the 2020 CBI court acquittals.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs States to Revisit Raising Judicial Officers' Retirement Age to 61 in 2 Weeks

The Supreme Court has held that States cannot use financial burden as a valid ground to oppose enhancing the retirement age of judicial officers. It has directed all States/UTs to decide within two weeks, in consultation with High Courts, on allowing district judges to serve up to 61 years while a petition for uniform 62 years remains pending.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Clarifies July 31 Order: Media Can Report Proceedings But Cannot Use Audio-Video Clips

The Supreme Court clarified that news outlets can report court proceedings but cannot use audio or video clips in their reports. This balances open justice with preventing misuse of selective clips. Key for understanding judicial transparency and media regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Lok Sabha Passes Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026; State Renamed 'Keralam' via Article 3

The Lok Sabha has passed the Kerala (Alteration of Name) Bill, 2026, to change the state's name from 'Kerala' to 'Keralam' in the Constitution. The Bill follows two unanimous state assembly resolutions and must now be passed by Rajya Sabha and receive President's assent. This is a key example of Article 3 procedure for state name change.

Polity Current Affairs

Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Non-Speaking Order, Restores 50% Pension to Govt Employee

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a punishment order withholding 50% pension of a government employee, holding that the disciplinary authority must pass a reasoned (speaking) order and consider the employee's defence. This reinforces the principle of natural justice and the requirement of speaking orders in disciplinary proceedings, a key concept for administrative law.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Seals 20 Madrasas Under New Minority Education Act; USAME Replaces Madrasa Board

Uttarakhand has sealed 20 unrecognised madrasas under a new regulatory framework that replaced its statutory Madrasa Board with the Uttarakhand State Authority for Minority Education (USAME). The move, backed by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling upholding state regulation of minority institutions while protecting Article 30 rights, signals a shift toward standardised education in minority-run schools. Aspirants must connect this to Article 21A, RTE Act, and the ongoing debate between minority autonomy and state regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Uses Article 142 to Quash CJP Protest FIRs; 2,873 Individuals Excluded

The Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to quash thousands of FIRs filed during CJP protests, except for 2,873 individuals with serious criminal antecedents. This controversial use of 'complete justice' powers bypasses the statutory quashing procedure under BNSS, reigniting debate on judicial overreach. For aspirants, this is a critical case study on Article 142's scope and limitations.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.