PolityGovernance
News 25 of 26

Supreme Court Permits Passive Euthanasia via 2-Level Medical Board System Citing Article 142 & Law Commission Reports

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GAPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
28 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:13 yearsArticle 142196th Report (2006)
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaLaw Commission of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court allowed discontinuation of life support for Harish Rana after 13 years in a vegetative state, highlighting the absence of a legal framework for end-of-life care.

2.The Court exercised its powers under Article 142, redefining passive euthanasia as a medical procedure guarded by a two-level medical board system, minimizing judicial intervention.

3.The judgment is part of a judicial tradition of 'gap-filling constitutionalism', similar to Vishaka and Puttaswamy, where courts step in to protect fundamental rights amidst legislative inaction.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

The Supreme Court's ruling in the Harish Rana case underscores India's persistent legislative vacuum on end-of-life care. The judiciary, using its powers under Article 142, has once again filled this gap by establishing a structured procedure for passive euthanasia, continuing a tradition of 'gap-filling constitutionalism' seen in landmark cases like Vishaka and Puttaswamy.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Duration of Vegetative State13 years
Key Constitutional Power UsedArticle 142
Landmark SC Case for Passive EuthanasiaAruna Shanbaug v. Union of India
Law Commission Report Year196th Report (2006)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Duration of Vegetative State: 13 years
  • ›Key Constitutional Power Used: Article 142
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 142 of the Constitution.
  • ›Target this Case Law: Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011).
  • ›Target this Report: Law Commission of India's 196th Report (2006).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article did the Supreme Court use to formulate guidelines for passive euthanasia in the Common Cause (2018) case, as referenced in the Harish Rana judgment?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the legal framework for end-of-life care in India:

1. The Law Commission of India's 196th Report, submitted in 2006, recommended a draft bill for the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill patients.

2. The Supreme Court's judgment in the Aruna Shanbaug case permanently legalized active euthanasia in India.

3. The Supreme Court, in the Harish Rana case, established a procedure for passive euthanasia involving a two-level system of medical boards.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

For how many years was Harish Rana in an unresponsive vegetative state before life support was discontinued as per the Supreme Court ruling?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional trend exemplified by the Supreme Court's judgment in the Harish Rana case, as discussed in the article?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Uses Article 142 to Quash CJP Protest FIRs; 2,873 Individuals Excluded

The Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to quash thousands of FIRs filed during CJP protests, except for 2,873 individuals with serious criminal antecedents. This controversial use of 'complete justice' powers bypasses the statutory quashing procedure under BNSS, reigniting debate on judicial overreach. For aspirants, this is a critical case study on Article 142's scope and limitations.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs States to Revisit Raising Judicial Officers' Retirement Age to 61 in 2 Weeks

The Supreme Court has held that States cannot use financial burden as a valid ground to oppose enhancing the retirement age of judicial officers. It has directed all States/UTs to decide within two weeks, in consultation with High Courts, on allowing district judges to serve up to 61 years while a petition for uniform 62 years remains pending.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Clarifies July 31 Order: Media Can Report Proceedings But Cannot Use Audio-Video Clips

The Supreme Court clarified that news outlets can report court proceedings but cannot use audio or video clips in their reports. This balances open justice with preventing misuse of selective clips. Key for understanding judicial transparency and media regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Strength Increased to 38 Judges: Will It Reduce Pendency and Free Up Constitution Benches?

Parliament has passed a bill increasing Supreme Court judge strength from 34 to 38, aimed at enabling regular Constitution Benches and reducing case backlog (92,101 cases pending as of Jan 1, 2026). However, past Law Commission reports question if more judges alone can solve pendency, and the real impact depends on filling vacancies and judicial management.

Polity Current Affairs

Advocates Act 1961 and Bar Council of India: Statutory Powers, Enrolment Process and Legal Education Standards

The BCI came under scrutiny after it briefly directed state bar councils to stop enrolling NALSAR University's 2026 batch, then withdrew the order. Since UPSC has asked about BCI before, aspirants must know its statutory origin under the Advocates Act 1961, its functions, and why enrolment is actually done by State Bar Councils.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Death by Hanging: Cites Stare Decisis, No Scientific Evidence for Lethal Injection

The Supreme Court has upheld hanging as the sole method of execution in India, dismissing a PIL that challenged its constitutional validity. The Court relied on the principle of stare decisis, citing a 1983 precedent and a lack of conclusive scientific evidence favoring lethal injection. This judgment reinforces the legal status quo on capital punishment but leaves the door open for future challenges.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Expands to 38 Judges: Diversity Deficit Exposed as Women Only 4.15%

Parliament passed the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, adding 4 judges to the apex court (strength now 38). However, the article underscores a glaring lack of diversity: women constitute only 4.15% of all SC judges ever appointed, and caste representation in High Courts remains abysmally low. For exam aspirants, this links directly to the collegium system, judicial appointments, social justice, and pendency crisis.

Polity Current Affairs

UCC: Uttarakhand Enforces Since Jan 2025, 3 State Bills Await Assent, Target 21 NDA States by 2029

The UCC debate is back with Uttarakhand implementing it in Jan 2025 and three other NDA states passing bills. Home Minister Amit Shah targets all 21 NDA-ruled states by 2029. The issue directly tests constitutional principles – Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights – and is a hot topic for UPSC prelims and mains.