The Supreme Court's ruling in the Harish Rana case underscores India's persistent legislative vacuum on end-of-life care. The judiciary, using its powers under Article 142, has once again filled this gap by establishing a structured procedure for passive euthanasia, continuing a tradition of 'gap-filling constitutionalism' seen in landmark cases like Vishaka and Puttaswamy.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Duration of Vegetative State: 13 years
- ›Key Constitutional Power Used: Article 142
- ›Target this Legal Point: Article 142 of the Constitution.
- ›Target this Case Law: Aruna Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011).
- ›Target this Report: Law Commission of India's 196th Report (2006).
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.