PolityGovernance
News 7 of 24

J&K and Ladakh HC Quashes JMC Order, Upholds Article 21 Right to Livelihood for Shopkeepers

PolitySUPPORT
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
12 Mar 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Article 21
Bodies:Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High CourtJammu Municipal CorporationPublic Works Department
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The J&K and Ladakh HC quashed a Jammu Municipal Corporation (JMC) order for a fresh safety audit, calling it a 'fraud on power' attempt to evict seven shopkeepers.

2.The court emphasized that the right to livelihood under Article 21 is fundamental and administrative action must be proportional, especially when a court-appointed technical committee had already declared the building safe.

3.This case highlights the judicial check on arbitrary executive action and the misuse of administrative processes to circumvent lawful eviction proceedings.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has set aside a municipal order for a fresh safety audit, protecting seven shopkeepers from an alleged fraudulent eviction attempt. The judgment reinforces that the right to livelihood under Article 21 cannot be undermined by arbitrary administrative action or a 'colourable use of power'.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
JudgeJustice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Key Legal ArticleArticle 21 (Right to Life & Personal Liberty)
Date of OrderMarch 7, 2026
Number of Petitioners7 shopkeepers

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court
  • ›Judge: Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal
  • ›Target this Data: 7 shopkeepers were the petitioners.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Jammu Municipal Corporation (JMC) was the respondent civic body.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life & Personal Liberty) includes the right to livelihood.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The right to livelihood is an integral part of which Fundamental Right under the Indian Constitution?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the news:

1. The High Court quashed an order by the Jammu Municipal Corporation commissioner for a fresh safety audit.

2. The court held that the initial report declaring the building unsafe was obtained with the intention of lawfully evicting the tenants.

3. The judgment emphasized that the process of declaring a building unsafe cannot be misused as a tool to dispossess tenants.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

How many shopkeepers were petitioners in the case before the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary legal principle invoked by the High Court to protect the shopkeepers from the municipal order?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Gujarat HC Quashes Demolition Order of Waqf Qabarstan, Upholds Statutory Right of Appeal

The Gujarat High Court quashed a demolition order against a century-old Muslim burial ground (Qabarstan) in Bhavnagar, ruling that the revenue authority violated the Waqf committee's statutory right to appeal under the Land Revenue Code by issuing a removal notice before the 90-day appeal window had even begun. This case is a critical reminder of procedural due process in property and religious rights matters.

Polity Current Affairs

J&K High Court Quashes PSA Detention Over Bovine Transport: Holds Procedural Lapses Violate Constitutional Guarantee

Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court quashed preventive detention under Public Safety Act for bovine transport, citing lack of subjective satisfaction on public order impact and non-communication of the right to make representation to the detaining authority. The ruling reinforces that procedural safeguards in preventive detention are mandatory and must be strictly complied with.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajasthan HC: Judicial Infrastructure Constitutional Duty, Not Govt Favour; Cites Article 21

The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that providing adequate judicial infrastructure is a constitutional duty of the state, not a favour. The court rejected financial constraints as an excuse, linking infrastructure to Article 21 (right to life and liberty), and ordered restoration of its Jodhpur building's Central Dome, which IIT Bombay found to be in imminent danger of collapse.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds NCLAT Order Setting Aside CCI's ₹301.6 Cr Penalty on Grasim

The Supreme Court upheld the NCLAT order setting aside CCI's ₹301.6 crore penalty on Grasim Industries for alleged abuse of dominance in the viscose staple fibre market. The Court affirmed that CCI violated natural justice by not providing a hearing after differing from the Director General's findings.

Polity Current Affairs

Article 249 Extended to J&K via 1954 Order Amendment Amid Suspended Assembly

This 1986 event shows how the Centre used Article 249 to legislate for J&K during President's Rule, highlighting the constitutional mechanism for central intervention in state subjects. Essential for understanding J&K's pre-370 abrogation dynamics and the application of Article 249 in national interest.

Polity Current Affairs

Karnataka HC Quashes KPSC Chairperson Suspension; Governor's Independent Action Invalid Under Article 317(1)

Karnataka High Court reinstates KPSC Chairperson Sahukar, ruling that the Governor's suspension order was invalid because it was passed without the aid and advice of the State Cabinet. This reaffirms the constitutional principle that the Governor is bound by Cabinet advice, even in matters concerning removal of SPSC members under Article 317(1). Important for understanding Governor's discretionary powers and the role of the Supreme Court in such inquiries.

Polity Current Affairs

Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Non-Speaking Order, Restores 50% Pension to Govt Employee

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has quashed a punishment order withholding 50% pension of a government employee, holding that the disciplinary authority must pass a reasoned (speaking) order and consider the employee's defence. This reinforces the principle of natural justice and the requirement of speaking orders in disciplinary proceedings, a key concept for administrative law.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.