PolityGovernance
News 21 of 22

Allahabad HC Limits Lok Adalat Jurisdiction: No Divorce Decrees Under Legal Services Act, 1987

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
31 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:April 30, 2026Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987NALSA (Lok Adalat) Regulations, 2009
Bodies:Allahabad High CourtDistrict Legal Services Authority (DLSA)Lok Adalat
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Allahabad HC's Lucknow Bench ruled Lok Adalats and DLSAs lack jurisdiction to grant divorce, as this power rests exclusively with Family Courts.

2.The judgment, delivered on April 30, 2026, clarified that Lok Adalats can only facilitate amicable settlements under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and cannot adjudicate.

3.This ruling is vital for understanding the separation of powers between alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and regular judicial forums.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Allahabad High Court has clarified a crucial legal boundary, ruling that Lok Adalats and District Legal Services Authorities cannot grant divorce decrees. This decision reinforces the exclusive jurisdiction of Family Courts in matrimonial dissolution, a key distinction for polity and law aspirants.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CourtAllahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench)
JudgesJustice Shekhar B Saraf & Justice A.K. Chaudhary
Key ActLegal Services Authorities Act, 1987
Date of OrderApril 30, 2026
Case OriginDLSA, Unnao (2018)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Court: Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench)
  • ›Judges: Justice Shekhar B Saraf & Justice A.K. Chaudhary
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Lok Adalats cannot grant divorce under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The power to dissolve marriage rests exclusively with Family Courts.
  • ›Target this Data: The ruling was delivered by the Allahabad High Court's Lucknow Bench on April 30, 2026.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Act are Lok Adalats established in India?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Allahabad High Court ruling on Lok Adalats:

1. The court held that Lok Adalats have the authority to grant divorce decrees if both parties mutually agree.

2. The judgment was based on the provisions of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the NALSA (Lok Adalat) Regulations, 2009.

3. The power to dissolve a marriage rests exclusively with the Family Courts.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

The Allahabad High Court ruling that Lok Adalats cannot grant divorce was delivered by a bench comprising which justices?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary legal rationale given by the Allahabad High Court for limiting the authority of Lok Adalats in divorce matters?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Public Employment is Public Trust; Unlawful Appointments Under Articles 14 & 16 Cannot Be Protected

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that public employment is a public trust, and appointments secured through deceit, misrepresentation, or abuse of judicial process cannot be protected. The court upheld the termination of a teacher whose appointment was found unlawful, and ordered recovery of salary and benefits received under interim court protection, reinforcing the constitutional mandate of equality under Articles 14 and 16.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes NSA Detention for Procedural Lapses under BNSS Section 126, Awards ₹5,000 Compensation

The Allahabad High Court quashed the NSA detention of Aakriti Chaudhary, a DU graduate, holding that the state concocted the story and violated procedural safeguards under BNSS Section 126. This reinforces judicial scrutiny of preventive detention laws and the importance of habeas corpus petitions.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Rules CCTV Footage Exempt Under RTI Section 8(1)(g), Cannot Be Provided Directly

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that CCTV footage cannot be directly provided to an applicant under the RTI Act as it is exempt under Section 8(1)(g). However, a court or commission can direct preservation and production of such footage after a complaint is filed. This clarifies the scope of RTI exemptions and the procedure for accessing sensitive information.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Upholds Mandatory Govt Service Bond for Subsidised PG Medical Education

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that doctors who pursue subsidised PG medical education cannot evade the mandatory two-year government service bond, even if there is administrative delay in providing posting. The court held that the bond ensures availability of doctors in government hospitals and protects patients' right to life under Article 21.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Quashes Class-B History Sheet, Holds Rubber-Stamped Approval Violates Articles 19, 21

The Allahabad High Court quashed a Class-B history sheet against a man, ruling that police surveillance without sufficient evidence of professional criminality violates fundamental rights under Articles 19 and 21. This judgment reinforces procedural safeguards in police regulations and is crucial for mains answers on fundamental rights, police powers, and judicial review.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad High Court: Govt Cannot Force Sale Deeds for Land Acquisition; Must Use LARR Act 2013

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that the government cannot force private landowners to sell their land through sale deeds if they are unwilling. If consent is not obtained, the government must follow the compulsory acquisition process under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. This distinction between voluntary sale and compulsory acquisition is crucial for land rights and government infrastructure projects.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC: Wearing Headscarf Not Essential Religious Practice; Reiterates Judicial Doctrine

The Allahabad High Court has reaffirmed the 'essential religious practices' test, ruling that wearing a headscarf is not essential to Islam. This judgment clarifies the scope of religious freedom in educational institutions and is crucial for understanding the judiciary's role in defining religious practices.

Lok Adalats, DLSAs have no…, Current Affairs for Exams