A critical case highlighting governance and environmental law loopholes. The Maharashtra government exempted a mining project from mandatory wildlife clearance by incorrectly claiming it was not in a tiger corridor, despite maps and the company's own application identifying it as such. This exposes tensions between statutory environmental protection and development approvals.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Forest Land Diverted: 9.4 sq km
- ›Project Company: Lloyds Metals & Energy
- ›Target this Data: 9.4 sq km forest land diversion in Gadchiroli
- ›Target this Nodal Body: National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA)
- ›Target this Legal Point: Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 & Section 38V for Tiger Conservation Plans
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.