PolitySocial Justice
News 6 of 28

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Maintenance as a Right Under Article 15(3) and CrPC Section 125, Rejects Husband's Plea

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
17 Feb 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:₹7,500 monthly maintenance₹5,000 monthly maintenanceArticle 15(3)Article 39CrPC Section 125
Bodies:Andhra Pradesh High CourtFamily Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed a husband's plea against paying monthly maintenance to his estranged wife (₹7,500) and minor son (₹5,000).

2.Justice Y Lakshmana Rao held maintenance is a personal liability flowing from marital status, grounded in Articles 15(3) and 39 of the Constitution.

3.The judgment reinforces that maintenance is a socio-legal obligation to prevent destitution, with quantum based on status, needs, and means of the liable person.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has reaffirmed that maintenance is a legal right, not charity, linking it to constitutional principles of social justice. This ruling strengthens the enforcement of maintenance obligations under CrPC Section 125 and the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, crucial for UPSC Polity and Social Justice sections.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Monthly Maintenance Ordered₹7,500 to wife, ₹5,000 to son
Constitutional Articles CitedArticle 15(3), Article 39
Primary Legal ProvisionsCrPC Section 125, HAM Act, 1956
Key Supreme Court CaseSavitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v State of Gujarat

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Monthly Maintenance Ordered: ₹7,500 to wife, ₹5,000 to son
  • ›Constitutional Articles Cited: Article 15(3), Article 39
  • ›Target this Data: ₹7,500 (wife) and ₹5,000 (son) monthly maintenance.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Family Courts (established under the Family Courts Act, 1984).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: CrPC Section 125 and HAM Act, 1956 for maintenance; Constitutional Articles 15(3) and 39.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

The maintenance order challenged in the Andhra Pradesh High Court was originally passed by which judicial forum?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment on maintenance:

1. The court held that maintenance is a personal liability of the husband arising from the marital relationship.

2. The judgment linked the right to maintenance exclusively to the Fundamental Rights chapter of the Constitution.

3. The court cited the Supreme Court case of Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya v State of Gujarat in its reasoning.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

As per the family court order upheld by the Andhra Pradesh High Court, what was the total monthly maintenance amount the husband was directed to pay?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary jurisprudential significance of the Andhra Pradesh High Court linking maintenance to Articles 15(3) and 39 of the Constitution?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Karnataka HC Upholds Rs 15 Lakh Alimony: Able-Bodied Husband Must Maintain Wife Even Without Income

Karnataka High Court affirmed Rs 15 lakh permanent alimony, ruling that an able-bodied husband cannot escape maintenance by claiming no income. The court emphasized strict adherence to Rajnesh vs Neha guidelines requiring both parties to disclose assets and liabilities before determining alimony.

Polity Current Affairs

Orissa High Court: Brothel Customer Not Liable Under Immoral Traffic Act; Kerala HC Takes Contrary View

The Orissa High Court has ruled that a customer found in a brothel cannot be prosecuted under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, as the Act does not penalize customers. This creates a conflict with the Kerala High Court's recent contrary ruling, making it a key exam point for judicial interpretation and legal provisions.

Polity Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Holds Right to Choose Spouse Under Article 21; Cites Article 25 on Voluntary Conversion

The Allahabad High Court has reaffirmed that the right to choose a matrimonial partner is part of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and that voluntary religious conversion is protected under Article 25 (Freedom of Conscience and Religion). The judgment, freeing a man confined by his father after converting to Islam, is crucial for understanding the scope of fundamental rights in interfaith relationships and the limits of state anti-conversion laws.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on Polygamy Challenge under Section 82 BNS

The Supreme Court has sought the Centre's response on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of polygamy and asked it to consider legislative steps to abolish the practice for all citizens. The petition seeks to treat polygamy as a criminal offence under Section 82 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which currently applies only to non-Muslims. This case could have far-reaching implications for Muslim Personal Law and gender justice.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

ECI Voter Roll Integrity Crisis: Right to Vote vs Software, Form 6 Changes Under Scrutiny

An Indian Express investigation reveals that two Election Commissioners objected to key decisions on electoral rolls, raising constitutional questions about the right to vote being subordinated to software and bureaucratic rules. The article, written by RJD MP in Rajya Sabha, warns against the 'bureaucratisation of citizen’s right to vote' and highlights the 97 Goa voters left out due to software limitations.