PolitySocial Justice
News 18 of 22

Janjati Suraksha Manch Demands Delisting of Christian Adivasis from ST Status Under Article 25 Challenge

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
31 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:Patna High Court 1963Article 251950 Presidential Order
Bodies:Supreme Court of IndiaPatna High CourtJharkhand Legislative Assembly
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Janjati Suraksha Manch (JSM) demands removal of Christian Adivasis from ST lists, seeking to extend SC religion-based criteria to tribes, which is constitutionally distinct.

2.The 1963 Patna High Court judgment in Kartik Oraon case is the governing precedent, stating 'tribal identity is not religion-based'.

3.The JSM's campaign is alleged to serve corporate interests by dividing Adivasi communities, while urgent issues like Forest Rights Act and PESA implementation remain unaddressed.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

RSS-affiliated groups demand the delisting of Christian Adivasis from Scheduled Tribe (ST) status, challenging a key legal precedent that tribal identity is not religion-based. This move, endorsed by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, raises critical constitutional questions under Article 25 and threatens to split Adivasi unity on crucial issues like forest rights and PESA.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Key OrganizationJanjati Suraksha Manch (JSM)
Governing Legal PrecedentPatna High Court, 1963 (Kartik Oraon case)
Constitutional ArticleArticle 25 (Freedom of Religion)
Related LawPanchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act (PESA)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Key Organization: Janjati Suraksha Manch (JSM)
  • ›Governing Legal Precedent: Patna High Court, 1963 (Kartik Oraon case)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Patna High Court, 1963 (Kartik Oraon case) - 'tribal identity is not religion-based'.
  • ›Target this Constitutional Article: Article 25 - Freedom of Religion.
  • ›Target this Distinction: SC benefits are religion-linked (1950 Order); ST benefits are NOT.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article guarantees the freedom of conscience and religion, a right central to the debate on Adivasi identity?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the legal status of Scheduled Tribes (STs) in India:

1. The Constitution of India links the identity of Scheduled Tribes to the religion they profess.

2. The Patna High Court, in its 1963 judgment on the Kartik Oraon case, held that tribal identity is based on ethnic and community kinship ties.

3. The Presidential Order of 1950 regarding Scheduled Castes, which links benefits to Hinduism, applies directly to Scheduled Tribes as well.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

In which year did the Patna High Court deliver the landmark judgment in the Kartik Oraon case, establishing that tribal identity is not religion-based?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is a primary criticism, as per the article, of the Janjati Suraksha Manch's (JSM) campaign to delist Christian Adivasis?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs Uniform Policy for Demolition & Rehabilitation of Unauthorised Homes Under Article 21

The Supreme Court has ruled that the state's power to demolish unauthorised constructions must be balanced with the duty to rehabilitate affected families, invoking Article 21 (right to dignity, shelter, livelihood). The court directed the Union and State governments to consider formulating a uniform demolition and rehabilitation policy.

Polity Current Affairs

Uttarakhand Seals 20 Madrasas Under New Minority Education Act; USAME Replaces Madrasa Board

Uttarakhand has sealed 20 unrecognised madrasas under a new regulatory framework that replaced its statutory Madrasa Board with the Uttarakhand State Authority for Minority Education (USAME). The move, backed by a 2024 Supreme Court ruling upholding state regulation of minority institutions while protecting Article 30 rights, signals a shift toward standardised education in minority-run schools. Aspirants must connect this to Article 21A, RTE Act, and the ongoing debate between minority autonomy and state regulation.

Polity Current Affairs

Health Ministry Backs Same-Sex Partners' Medical Decision Rights Under Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

The Union Health Ministry has told the Delhi High Court that excluding same-sex partners from making medical decisions for each other solely based on sexual orientation is unethical. This marks a significant administrative shift, though the government maintains that 'spouse' under Indian marriage laws only applies to heterosexual couples, creating a nuanced legal landscape for exam aspirants.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds EC's SIR, Citizenship Under MHA; 13 Crore Deletions, Aadhaar Alternative Proposed

The Supreme Court upheld the EC's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, which deleted over 13 crore names, but clarified that citizenship determination is solely under the Ministry of Home Affairs. This raises critical debates on voter rights, due process, and the viability of Aadhaar-based verification as a cost-effective, inclusive alternative to house-to-house surveys.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Seeks Centre Reply on PIL: Minors' Online Accounts Without Valid Contracts Under Section 11 Indian Contract Act

A PIL filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance has challenged the practice of allowing minors to independently sign up for digital platforms without verified parental consent. The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Centre, highlighting the legal gap between Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act (barring minors from contracts) and existing IT/DPDP rules.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Proposes Exempting Current Class 6 from Three-Language Policy; Centre Seeks More Time

The Supreme Court has proposed exempting the current Class 6 batch from the mandatory three-language policy, suggesting implementation from January 1, 2027. The Centre has sought more time to decide, while the court has asked for details on teacher availability and infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

SC's 76-Year Journey: Reforms at Magistracy Level Needed for Judicial Overhaul

A former Delhi High Court judge critiques the Indian judiciary's performance over 76 years, highlighting issues like eviction of poor without rehabilitation, failure to curb extra-legal punishments, and delay in upholding progressive judgments. The article argues that meaningful judicial reform must begin at the magisterial level, focusing on mentoring, mental health support, and performance evaluation reforms.

The majoritarian shadow over…, Current Affairs for Exams