The Supreme Court has delivered a crucial judgment clarifying that the fundamental right to travel abroad (Article 21) of an accused person is not absolute and must be balanced against the victim's right to a speedy trial and societal interest in criminal justice. This ruling overturns a High Court order and provides key jurisprudence for future cases involving bail and travel permissions.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Constitutional Article: Article 21
- ›Bench Composition: Justice Dipankar Datta & Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
- ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty) and its expansion to include the right to travel abroad and right to speedy trial.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (Division Bench).
- ›Target this Data: The case originated from an FIR filed in 2014, and the trial had not started even after ten years.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.