The Supreme Court has indicated it cannot create a universal test for when the state can intervene in religious matters for social reform under Article 25(2)(b). This critical hearing on the Sabarimala review and Dawoodi Bohra excommunication case underscores the complex balance between religious freedom and social welfare, a recurring theme in polity and governance questions.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Bench Strength: Nine-Judge Bench
- ›Key Article (State Power): Article 25(2)(b)
- ›Target this Data: A Nine-Judge Bench is hearing the matter.
- ›Target this Nodal Body: The Supreme Court of India (Constitutional Bench).
- ›Target this Legal Point: The interplay between Article 25(2)(b) (state power for social reform) and Article 26(b) (denomination's right to manage affairs).
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.