PolityJudiciary
News 0 of 26

SC's 9-Judge Bench Declines to Set General Rule on State Intervention Under Article 25(2)(b) for Religious Social Reforms

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
22 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Nine-Judge BenchArticle 25(2)(b)Article 26(b)
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.A nine-judge Supreme Court bench, led by CJI Surya Kant, is hearing arguments on state intervention in religious affairs under Articles 25 and 26.

2.The Court stated it is difficult to lay down future guidelines, emphasizing that the legitimacy of state intervention for social reform depends on case-specific facts.

3.The hearing also involves a connected challenge to the practice of excommunication in the Dawoodi Bohra community, questioning the maintainability of a writ petition against a 1962 judgment.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has indicated it cannot create a universal test for when the state can intervene in religious matters for social reform under Article 25(2)(b). This critical hearing on the Sabarimala review and Dawoodi Bohra excommunication case underscores the complex balance between religious freedom and social welfare, a recurring theme in polity and governance questions.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench StrengthNine-Judge Bench
Key Article (State Power)Article 25(2)(b)
Key Article (Denomination Right)Article 26(b)
Related CaseDawoodi Bohra Excommunication

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench Strength: Nine-Judge Bench
  • ›Key Article (State Power): Article 25(2)(b)
  • ›Target this Data: A Nine-Judge Bench is hearing the matter.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Supreme Court of India (Constitutional Bench).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The interplay between Article 25(2)(b) (state power for social reform) and Article 26(b) (denomination's right to manage affairs).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional article empowers the state to make laws for social welfare and reform relating to religious practices?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Supreme Court hearing:

1. The Court is hearing arguments on a blanket rule for state intervention in religious affairs under Article 25.

2. The Court stated it is easy to declare what constitutes an 'essential religious practice' for any group.

3. The hearing also involves a connected petition concerning the Dawoodi Bohra community's practice of excommunication.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

How many judges constitute the Supreme Court bench hearing the Sabarimala reference case, as per the article?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary reason given by the Supreme Court for declining to lay down future guidelines on state intervention in religious affairs?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Revises Interim Stay, Preserves Allahabad HC Quashing of NSA Detention Under Article 21

The Supreme Court revised its September 23 interim order, restricting the stay to only certain strictures and costs against the Noida DM, thereby preserving the Allahabad High Court's landmark quashing of a DU student's NSA detention. The case also raises serious questions about the SC's roster system and 'out-of-turn' listing, making it a critical study point for judicial review, preventive detention safeguards, and constitutional procedures.

Polity Current Affairs

Article 124(3) Provision for 'Distinguished Jurist' as Supreme Court Judge Remains Unused Since 1950

Article 124(3) of the Constitution allows appointment of a 'distinguished jurist' as a Supreme Court judge, but this provision has never been invoked in 76 years. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan recently questioned this non-use, highlighting the lost opportunity for legal academics to contribute to the judiciary. This is a key constitutional issue for UPSC with potential for both prelims facts and mains analysis.

Polity Current Affairs

Article 124(3) Never Used: SC Judge Calls for Appointment of Distinguished Jurist

Article 124(3) of the Constitution allows the President to appoint a 'distinguished jurist' as a Supreme Court judge. This provision has never been used in over 76 years. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan recently called it an 'unused mandate' that needs serious attention to diversify the bench.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Asks Centre to Extend Tenure of 248 Tribunal Members Under Tribunal Reforms Act, 2026

The Supreme Court has directed the Centre to consider extending the tenure of retiring tribunal members for a month to prevent tribunals from becoming defunct. This comes as 248 members are eligible for extension under the new Tribunal Reforms Act, 2026, and the Court has also granted interim extension to three NGT members. For exam aspirants, this highlights the critical link between judicial efficiency, tribunal reforms, and the appointment process under new legislation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.