PolityGovernance
News 3 of 22

Shiv Sena (UBT) Challenges Speaker's Merger Recognition in Supreme Court Under 10th Schedule

PolityCORE
Target:MPSCUPSC GS-IISSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
21 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:July 18, 20266 MPs
Bodies:Supreme CourtLok Sabha Speaker
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Shiv Sena (UBT) moved Supreme Court against Lok Sabha Speaker's recognition of merger of six UBT MPs with the Shinde-led Shiv Sena.

2.The petition challenges the July 18 circular as 'ex-facie unconstitutional' and a 'constitutional hara-kiri', arguing MPs defied party mandate.

3.CJI Surya Kant heard the urgent mention; the case raises key issues under the Tenth Schedule about individual MP mergers without party merger.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

Shiv Sena (UBT) has moved the Supreme Court challenging Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla's decision to recognize the merger of six of its MPs with the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena. The petition argues the Speaker's July 18 circular is unconstitutional and violates the Tenth Schedule (anti-defection law), as the MPs acted without the merger of the original political party.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

PetitionerArvind Ganpat Sawant (Shiv Sena UBT)
RespondentLok Sabha Speaker (through circular dated 18.07.2026)
Date of CircularJuly 18, 2026
Number of MPs Merged6
CJI HearingCJI Suryakant

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Petitioner: Arvind Ganpat Sawant (Shiv Sena UBT)
  • ›Respondent: Lok Sabha Speaker (through circular dated 18.07.2026)
  • ›Target this Data: Circular date: July 18, 2026; Number of MPs: 6
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Lok Sabha Speaker (quasi-judicial role under Tenth Schedule)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law) - conditions for merger vs defection

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional provision deals with disqualification on grounds of defection?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Tenth Schedule:

1. A merger of a political party is valid only if at least two-thirds of its members agree to the merger.

2. The Speaker's decision under the Tenth Schedule is final and cannot be challenged in any court.

3. The anti-defection law was added by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did the Lok Sabha Speaker issue the circular recognizing the merger of six Shiv Sena (UBT) MPs?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional argument made by Shiv Sena (UBT) against the Speaker's recognition of the merger?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Independently Investigate Sex Determination Cases Under PC&PNDT Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot independently investigate offences under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. Only the Appropriate Authority, a specialised body under the Act, can investigate. Police may assist but cannot take over the investigation, and any separate criminal offences (IPC/BNS) can be investigated independently. This clarifies a long-standing legal confusion and is crucial for understanding the enforcement mechanism of this social legislation.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

AP High Court Declares Three-Capitals Petitions Infructuous; Amaravati Now Sole Capital Under AP Reorganisation (Amendment) Act 2026

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has deemed all petitions against the proposed three-capitals model as infructuous after Parliament amended the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, making Amaravati the sole capital by law. This ends a long-standing political and legal battle, with implications for state governance and federal structure.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.