PolityEducation
News 7 of 25

Supreme Court Directs Rajasthan to Frame Policy for Rajasthani as Medium of Instruction, Citing NEP 2020 and RTE Act 2009

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
13 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:May 12, 2026November 27, 2024September 25, 2026September 30, 2026
Bodies:Supreme CourtRajasthan High CourtRajasthan State Government
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court directed the Rajasthan government to formulate a policy for introducing Rajasthani as a medium of instruction in schools and colleges.

2.The Court referenced the National Education Policy 2020 and the Right to Education Act 2009 to support education in the mother tongue and regional languages.

3.The ruling criticizes the state's inaction and clarifies that languages need not be in the Eighth Schedule to be used as a medium of instruction.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has mandated the Rajasthan government to create a policy for using Rajasthani as a medium of instruction in schools and colleges. This directive is based on the principles of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the Right to Education (RTE) Act 2009, emphasizing education in the mother tongue. It highlights a significant judicial push for implementing constitutional and policy mandates on language in education.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench of JusticesVikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta
High Court Order DateNovember 27, 2024
Compliance Affidavit DeadlineSeptember 25, 2026
Next Hearing DateSeptember 30, 2026

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench of Justices: Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta
  • ›High Court Order Date: November 27, 2024
  • ›Target this Data: Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta issued the directive on May 12, 2026.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (Judicial intervention) and Rajasthan State Government (Implementation body).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Reference to National Education Policy 2020 and Right to Education Act 2009 as the policy foundation for the directive.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional document's schedule was discussed in relation to the medium of instruction in the Supreme Court's judgment?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's judgment on Rajasthani as a medium of instruction:

1. The Court directed the Rajasthan government to formulate a policy for introducing Rajasthani as a medium of instruction.

2. The judgment stated that only languages listed in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution can be used as a medium of instruction in schools.

3. The Court referenced the National Education Policy 2020 and the Right to Education Act 2009 to support its directive.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

By what date did the Supreme Court direct the Rajasthan government to file an affidavit indicating compliance with its directions on Rajasthani as a medium of instruction?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary constitutional and legal basis cited by the Supreme Court for directing the introduction of Rajasthani as a medium of instruction?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Directs TN to Identify Land for Navodaya Schools in 3 Months Amid Language Policy Row

The Supreme Court orally observed that Tamil Nadu must drop its 'anti-Hindi mindset' and comply with the Navodaya Vidyalaya Scheme. The state argues language choice is a fundamental right and its two-language policy law prevents the three-language formula. The court gave three months to identify land and scheduled next hearing on December 14, 2026.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC on Article 17: Purification Ritual After Dalit Use Raises Untouchability Question

A purification ritual at Haldwani after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's rally has reignited the legal debate on untouchability. The Supreme Court's 2024 ruling in Sukanya Shantha case links Article 17 to caste-based notions of 'purity and pollution', extending its reach beyond denial of entry to discriminatory acts based on touch or presence.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment on Sex Work: Article 142, Consent, and Rights Framework

The Supreme Court in May 2026 delivered a landmark judgment on sex work, holding that consenting adult sex workers cannot be forcibly rescued and affirming their constitutional rights despite social disapproval. The judgment invokes Article 142 for legal force, spans nearly 300 pages, and departs from global anti-trafficking assumptions, but raises concerns about institutional implementation and caste discrimination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

SC directs State govt. to frame…, Current Affairs for Exams