PolityGovernance
News 32 of 38

Supreme Court Orders CBI Inquiry into ₹1,270 Cr Arunachal Pradesh Public Contracts Linked to CM's Family (2015-2025)

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
06 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:₹1,270 crore2015-202516 weeks
Bodies:Supreme CourtCentral Bureau of Investigation (CBI)
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court directed a CBI preliminary inquiry into alleged irregularities in awarding ₹1,270 crore worth of public contracts in Arunachal Pradesh over a decade (2015-2025), linked to CM Pema Khandu's family.

2.The Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta ordered the CBI to submit a status report within 16 weeks and mandated full cooperation from the state government, including the appointment of nodal officers.

3.This case highlights critical themes for exams: judicial activism in corruption cases, the CBI's jurisdiction in state matters, and the legal framework for conflict of interest in public procurement.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has directed the CBI to probe allegations of corruption and nepotism in awarding public contracts worth ₹1,27,000 crore in Arunachal Pradesh, allegedly linked to the Chief Minister's family. This case tests the judiciary's role in enforcing probity in public office and the CBI's autonomy in politically sensitive probes, making it crucial for governance and ethics questions.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Alleged Contract Value₹1,270 crore
Investigation PeriodJan 2015 - Dec 2025
SC BenchJustices Vikram Nath & Sandeep Mehta
Report DeadlineWithin 16 weeks

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Alleged Contract Value: ₹1,270 crore
  • ›Investigation Period: Jan 2015 - Dec 2025
  • ›Target this Data: ₹1,270 crore & the period 2015-2025.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The Supreme Court's power to monitor investigations under Article 142.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Ministry does the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) function?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's order mentioned in the news:

1. The CBI was directed to commence a preliminary inquiry into public contracts awarded in Arunachal Pradesh from 2015 to 2025.

2. The Court ordered the CBI to submit its final investigation report within the next 8 weeks.

3. The Bench also directed the State Chief Secretary to designate a nodal officer to coordinate with the CBI.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What is the total alleged value of public contracts under scrutiny in the Supreme Court-ordered CBI inquiry into Arunachal Pradesh?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary purpose of the 'preliminary inquiry' ordered by the Supreme Court in this case, as clarified by the Court?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe into Custodial Death, ₹25 Lakh Interim Compensation for 2-Year FIR Delay

The Supreme Court transferred the probe into a 2024 custodial death in Chhattisgarh to the CBI, citing a two-year delay by state police in filing the FIR. It also awarded ₹25 lakh interim compensation to the family, highlighting judicial oversight on police accountability and custodial violence.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Dismisses 2017 PIL to Abolish Hanging Execution; Centre May Review Alternatives

The Supreme Court dismissed a 2017 PIL seeking to replace hanging with less painful methods like lethal injection, but allowed the Centre to form an expert body to review execution methods. The judgment references the Law Commission's 187th Report and emphasizes preserving dignity while minimizing pain.

Polity Current Affairs

Article 124(3) Provision for 'Distinguished Jurist' as Supreme Court Judge Remains Unused Since 1950

Article 124(3) of the Constitution allows appointment of a 'distinguished jurist' as a Supreme Court judge, but this provision has never been invoked in 76 years. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan recently questioned this non-use, highlighting the lost opportunity for legal academics to contribute to the judiciary. This is a key constitutional issue for UPSC with potential for both prelims facts and mains analysis.