PolitySocial_Issues
News 0 of 29

SC Takes Suo Motu Cognizance of Delay in Access to Life-Saving Drugs Case Under Article 21

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
17 Jul 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:₹78,468 per month57 times listedRibociclib
Bodies:Supreme CourtKerala High CourtNational Cancer InstituteChittaranjan National Cancer InstituteRegional Cancer Centre ThiruvananthapuramDrugs Controller General of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC takes suo motu cognizance of delays in cases involving access to life-saving drugs under Article 21.

2.Kerala HC matter on Ribociclib (breast cancer drug) listed 57 times without a final hearing; petitioner died during pendency.

3.Case pertains to bringing down Ribociclib price via domestic manufacture under Patents Act government-use licence.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has intervened suo motu to address judicial delays in cases concerning access to life-saving drugs, specifically highlighting a Kerala HC matter on Ribociclib (breast cancer drug) listed 57 times without conclusion. This directly links to Article 21 (Right to Life) and raises critical issues of access to affordable medicines, patent law, and judicial efficiency.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

SC Case TitleIn Re: Access to Life Saving Medicines and Judicial Expediency in Article 21 Matters
Drug NameRibociclib (for HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer)
Monthly Cost₹78,468
HC Listing Count57 times without conclusion
Key Legal ProvisionGovernment-use licence under Patents Act
SC Bench CJICJI Surya Kant; Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana

1-Minute Revision

  • ›SC Case Title: In Re: Access to Life Saving Medicines and Judicial Expediency in Article 21 Matters
  • ›Drug Name: Ribociclib (for HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer)
  • ›Target this Data: ₹78,468 per month cost of Ribociclib; listed 57 times without conclusion
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court (CJI Surya Kant bench) and Kerala High Court
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Article 21 (Right to Life) and Patents Act government-use licence

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which Article of the Constitution of India has been invoked by the Supreme Court in the case related to access to life-saving drugs?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court's suo motu cognizance:

1. The case pertains to bringing down the price of Ribociclib through domestic manufacture under a government-use licence.

2. The Centre rejected the request for domestic manufacture on grounds that breast cancer did not meet the threshold of national urgency.

3. The Kerala High Court had listed the matter 57 times and concluded it with a final judgment.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What is the monthly cost of Ribociclib, the patented breast cancer drug mentioned in the news?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary legal mechanism sought by the original petitioner to make Ribociclib more affordable?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Supreme Court takes cognizance of…, Current Affairs for Exams