PolitySocial Justice
News 17 of 24

SC Expands 'Acid Attack Victim' Definition Under RPwD Act 2016 to Include Forcible Acid Ingestion

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
04 May 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:RPwD Act 2016May 4, 2026
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court, in a significant ruling, included persons forcibly administered acid within the definition of 'acid attack victims' under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016.

2.The 2016 Act previously recognized only victims of acid-throwing, creating a legal lacuna for victims of forced ingestion.

3.The judgment is operative retrospectively from the inception of the Act in 2016, allowing affected victims to claim disability benefits.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has expanded the legal definition of 'acid attack victims' under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 to include survivors of forcible acid ingestion. This crucial judicial interpretation, which applies retrospectively from 2016, closes a legal gap and enables these victims to access disability benefits and compensation previously reserved only for victims of acid-throwing.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Act AmendedRights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016
Court & DateSupreme Court, May 4, 2026
Retrospective EffectFrom Act's inception (2016)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Act Amended: Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016
  • ›Court & Date: Supreme Court, May 4, 2026
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016.
  • ›Target this Judicial Action: Supreme Court's expansion of 'acid attack victim' definition to include forcible acid ingestion.
  • ›Target this Procedural Detail: The order is operative retrospectively from the Act's inception in 2016.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Act did the Supreme Court expand the definition of 'acid attack victims'?

Q2Statement-basedMedium

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Supreme Court ruling:

1. The Court expanded the definition of 'acid attack victims' to include survivors of forcible acid ingestion under the RPwD Act.

2. The 2016 Act originally recognized both acid-throwing and acid ingestion as forms of acid attack.

3. The Court's order is operative with prospective effect only, from the date of the judgment.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

From when is the Supreme Court's order on acid attack victims under the RPwD Act operative?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary implication of the Supreme Court's ruling on the RPwD Act definition?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Reviews UGC Equity Regulations 2026: Caste Discrimination Definition in Question

The Centre is reconsidering the UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 after the Supreme Court stayed them, citing ambiguities in the definition of 'caste-based discrimination'. This has political and constitutional implications, especially with upcoming UP elections, making it a high-yield topic for both Prelims and Mains.

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Issues Notice to Centre on Plea to Ban Polygamy Under Section 82 BNS Uniformly

The Supreme Court has sought the Centre's response on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of polygamy among Muslims, arguing it violates gender equality and is a primary driver of female destitution. The plea seeks uniform application of Section 82 BNS (bigamy law) and compulsory registration of Muslim marriages. This case could reignite the Uniform Civil Code debate and has implications for personal law reforms.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.