PolityGovernance
News 2 of 26

Supreme Court Enhances Accident Compensation by 463%, Sets Formula for Prosthetic Limb Costs Under MACT

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
22 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:463.8%Rs 49.22 lakhRs 8.73 lakh70 years5 yearsRs 3 lakh
Bodies:Supreme CourtMotor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT)Rajasthan High Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Supreme Court bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan enhanced compensation for a 2007 road accident victim from Rs 8.73 lakh to Rs 49.22 lakh.

2.The Court established a formula assuming life expectancy of 70 years, prosthetic limb life of 5 years, awarding Rs 3 lakh per limb and Rs 5 lakh for maintenance.

3.The judgment mandates claimants to submit quotes from at least two providers for prosthetic costs and refuses to accept unrealistically low government-notified rates.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has delivered a landmark judgment redefining 'just compensation' for motor accident victims who suffer amputations, significantly enhancing compensation by 463% and establishing a structured formula for calculating lifetime prosthetic limb costs. This ruling sets a precedent for future cases and emphasizes the principle of restoration of dignity and independence.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Compensation Hike (%)463.8%
Final Compensation AmountRs 49.22 lakh
BenchJustices JB Pardiwala & KV Viswanathan
Assumed Life Expectancy70 years
Usable Life of Prosthetic Limb5 years
Cost per Prosthetic LimbRs 3 lakh
Interest Rate for Non-compliance9% per annum

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Compensation Hike (%): 463.8%
  • ›Final Compensation Amount: Rs 49.22 lakh
  • ›Target this Data: Compensation enhanced by 463.8% (from Rs 8.73 lakh to Rs 49.22 lakh)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Principle of 'Just Compensation' under Motor Vehicles Act

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which judicial body initially adjudicated the motor accident claim in this case?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the Supreme Court judgment:

1. The Court enhanced the compensation by 463.8%, raising it from Rs 8.73 lakh to Rs 49.22 lakh.

2. The Court accepted the government-notified rates for prosthetic limbs as the basis for calculating compensation.

3. The Court assumed a life expectancy of 70 years and a prosthetic limb's usable life of 5 years for its calculation.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the Supreme Court's formula, what is the cost allocated per prosthetic limb?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary objective of the Supreme Court's mandate for claimants to submit quotes from multiple prosthetic providers?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Independently Investigate Sex Determination Cases Under PC&PNDT Act

The Supreme Court has ruled that police cannot independently investigate offences under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994. Only the Appropriate Authority, a specialised body under the Act, can investigate. Police may assist but cannot take over the investigation, and any separate criminal offences (IPC/BNS) can be investigated independently. This clarifies a long-standing legal confusion and is crucial for understanding the enforcement mechanism of this social legislation.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

SC on Article 17: Purification Ritual After Dalit Use Raises Untouchability Question

A purification ritual at Haldwani after Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's rally has reignited the legal debate on untouchability. The Supreme Court's 2024 ruling in Sukanya Shantha case links Article 17 to caste-based notions of 'purity and pollution', extending its reach beyond denial of entry to discriminatory acts based on touch or presence.