PolityGovernance
News 1 of 22

SC Declares Right to Walk Safely on Footpaths a Fundamental Right Under Article 21, Prioritises Pedestrians Over Motor Vehicles

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
21 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:163% increase in pedestrian deaths13,894 (2015)36,526 (2024)21.24% overall road fatalities increaseArticle 21
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.SC holds right to walk safely on footpaths as a fundamental right under Article 21, overriding motor vehicle priority.

2.Pedestrian deaths jumped 163% from 13,894 (2015) to 36,526 (2024) while overall road fatalities rose 21.24%.

3.Court criticises Motor Vehicles Act and elite bias for ignoring walkers; verdict stems from death of a 5-year-old walking to school.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

The Supreme Court has ruled that the right to walk safely on demarcated footpaths is a fundamental right under Article 21, taking precedence over motor vehicle movement. This landmark verdict comes amid a 163% surge in pedestrian deaths (2015-2024), forcing a rethinking of car-centric urban planning in India.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Pedestrian Deaths (2015)13,894
Pedestrian Deaths (2024)36,526
Increase in Pedestrian Deaths163%
Overall Road Fatalities Increase (2015-24)21.24%
Constitutional Article InvokedArticle 21
Case OriginDeath of a 5-year-old walking to school

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Pedestrian Deaths (2015): 13,894
  • ›Pedestrian Deaths (2024): 36,526
  • ›Target this Data: Pedestrian deaths up 163% from 13,894 (2015) to 36,526 (2024)
  • ›Target this Constitutional Point: Article 21 right to walk safely on footpaths as fundamental right
  • ›Target this Criticism: Motor Vehicles Act does not recognise pedestrian right over motorised road

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which article of the Constitution did the Supreme Court invoke to declare the right to walk safely on footpaths as a fundamental right?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. Pedestrian deaths in India increased from 13,894 in 2015 to 36,526 in 2024.

2. Overall road fatalities in India rose by 21.24% between 2015 and 2024.

3. The Supreme Court ruling stated that the Motor Vehicles Act already prioritises pedestrian rights over motor vehicles.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

What was the number of pedestrian deaths recorded in India in 2024?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary implication of the Supreme Court’s verdict on pedestrian rights?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

SC: Right to Walk on Demarcated Footpaths is Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(d) & Article 21

The Supreme Court declared the right to walk on demarcated footpaths as a fundamental right under Articles 19(1)(d) and 21, prioritizing pedestrians over motorized vehicles. It has now directed all states and UTs to respond on implementation, making it a high-yield topic for Prelims (constitutional articles, dates) and Mains (urban governance, fundamental rights).

Polity Current Affairs

Patna HC Rules Religious Freedom Under Article 25 Subject to Public Order and Morality

Patna High Court holds that the right to profess and practise religion under Article 25 is not absolute and can be restricted for public order, morality, and health. This reiterates the essential religious practices doctrine and clarifies that constitutional protection does not extend to every mode of exercise. A plea for 300 devotees in a religious procession in Siwan, Bihar, was dismissed citing past law-and-order incidents.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes NEET Protest FIRs Under Article 142, Orders Compensation Policy for Suicide Victims

Supreme Court used Article 142 to quash all FIRs registered against NEET protesters across India, while ordering compensation policy for families of students who died by suicide. This judgment underscores the balance between protest rights and criminal liability, and the government's commitment to address exam leak issues.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Recognises Student Mental Health Under Article 21 in Sukdeb Saha (2025); NEET Paper Leak Tests Institutional Responsibility

The Supreme Court has expanded the right to life (Article 21) to include student mental health, holding institutions responsible for student suicides under Sukdeb Saha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025). The NEET paper leak of 2026 becomes the first major test of this new constitutional principle, forcing the state to move beyond individual controversies toward structural reform in examinations and recruitment.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Upholds Clinical Establishments Rules 2012: Price Range Fixing Under Article 47

The Union Health Ministry defended the constitutional validity of the 2012 Clinical Establishments Rules before the Supreme Court, arguing that price regulation of healthcare services is essential to fulfill the mandate of Article 47 (DPSP). This is a key case for understanding the balance between fundamental rights (Article 19(1)(g)) and reasonable restrictions in the interest of public health.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes All NEET Protest FIRs Under CJI Surya Kant; Raises Selective Justice Issue on Right to Peaceful Protest

The Supreme Court quashed all FIRs against NEET student protesters, affirming the constitutional right to peaceful protest. However, the editorial raises concerns about selective justice, noting that cases against factory workers, CAA protesters, and farmers remain pending, potentially criminalizing dissent based on the protester's identity.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Landmark Prajwala Judgment: Victim Protection Plan Under Article 142 for Sex Trafficking Victims

The Supreme Court in Prajwala vs Union of India (May 2026) delivered a historic judgment that places sex-trafficked persons at the centre of criminal justice. It declares rehabilitation a right, introduces a Victim Protection Plan under Articles 32 and 142, and mandates a threshold inquiry within a week to distinguish voluntary sex workers from coerced victims.