PolitySocial Justice
News 0 of 27

Supreme Court Refers Talaq-e-Hasan Validity Plea to Mediation, Stays Divorce in Similar Case

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
11 Feb 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:Article 14Article 15Article 21Article 252026-02-112025-11-19
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court refused to grant an interim stay on the practice of talaq-e-hasan, citing sensitivity, but referred a specific case to mediation led by retired Justice Kurian Joseph.

2.The Court stayed a divorce in a separate petition where the husband was unresponsive, ordering that the couple be deemed validly married unless a valid talaq is proven.

3.The core legal challenge questions if talaq-e-hasan violates Articles 14, 15, 21, and 25, continuing the judicial scrutiny of Muslim personal laws post the Shayara Bano case.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

The Supreme Court is hearing challenges to the practice of talaq-e-hasan, a form of Muslim divorce, citing constitutional concerns. While refusing an interim stay due to the matter's sensitivity, the court has directed a specific case to mediation and stayed a divorce in another, highlighting its cautious approach to reforming personal laws.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bench CompositionCJI Surya Kant & Justice Joymalya Bagchi
Mediator AppointedRetired SC Justice Kurian Joseph
PIL Filed OnNovember 19, 2025
Articles Challenged14, 15, 21, 25

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bench Composition: CJI Surya Kant & Justice Joymalya Bagchi
  • ›Mediator Appointed: Retired SC Justice Kurian Joseph
  • ›Target this Data: November 19, 2025 (Date SC issued notice on the PIL)
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: Supreme Court of India (Bench of CJI Surya Kant & Justice Joymalya Bagchi)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Articles 14, 15, 21, 25 of the Constitution (Articles under challenge)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageMedium

In the context of the Indian judiciary, who has the authority to appoint a mediator in a case pending before the Supreme Court?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the recent Supreme Court proceedings on talaq-e-hasan:

1. The Court granted an interim stay on the practice of talaq-e-hasan across the country.

2. The Court referred the constitutional challenge to a 5-judge Constitution Bench for final hearing.

3. The Court appointed a retired Supreme Court judge as a mediator in one of the petitions.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

On which date did the Supreme Court issue notice on the PIL filed by Benazeer Heena challenging talaq-e-hasan?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What is the primary constitutional principle being tested in the petitions challenging talaq-e-hasan before the Supreme Court?

All 20 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Chhattisgarh HC Rules Shariyat Court Cannot Legally Dissolve Marriage; Triple Talaq Order Set Aside

Chhattisgarh High Court held that a Shariyat Court's declaration of triple talaq (Talaq-e-Hasan) has no legal authority. The judgment reinforces the supremacy of constitutional law over religious decrees, a crucial topic for UPSC mains on secularism and Uniform Civil Code.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Rules NCSC Cannot Issue Binding Directions Under Article 338

The Supreme Court clarified that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) has only recommendatory and advisory powers under Article 338, not adjudicatory powers. It cannot issue binding orders in service disputes. This ruling sets boundaries for constitutional commissions under Articles 338, 338A, and 338B.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Seeks Centre's Response on Polygamy Challenge under Section 82 BNS

The Supreme Court has sought the Centre's response on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of polygamy and asked it to consider legislative steps to abolish the practice for all citizens. The petition seeks to treat polygamy as a criminal offence under Section 82 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which currently applies only to non-Muslims. This case could have far-reaching implications for Muslim Personal Law and gender justice.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Landmark Judgment on Sex Work: Article 142, Consent, and Rights Framework

The Supreme Court in May 2026 delivered a landmark judgment on sex work, holding that consenting adult sex workers cannot be forcibly rescued and affirming their constitutional rights despite social disapproval. The judgment invokes Article 142 for legal force, spans nearly 300 pages, and departs from global anti-trafficking assumptions, but raises concerns about institutional implementation and caste discrimination.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Nine-Judge Bench Revisits 'Industry' Definition: Bangalore Water Supply Case (1978) Under Scrutiny

The Supreme Court's nine-judge bench is set to rule on the definition of 'industry' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, potentially expanding or contracting labour protections for workers in hospitals, educational institutions, and government welfare schemes. This landmark decision could impact millions of employees and reshape industrial relations law.

Supreme Court refers plea against…, Current Affairs for Exams