The Supreme Court revived criminal investigations into a Bengaluru land fraud, overturning a Karnataka High Court order that had quashed the FIRs. The ruling clarifies the boundaries of High Courts' inherent powers under CrPC Section 482 and reiterates that the existence of a civil dispute does not bar criminal proceedings for cognisable offences.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Bench: Justices Vikram Nath & Sandeep Mehta
- ›HC Judgment Quashed: September 28, 2016
- ›Target this Legal Point: Scope and limits of High Court's inherent powers under Section 482, CrPC.
- ›Target this Legal Point: Magistrate's power under Section 156(3), CrPC to order investigation.
- ›Target this Principle: Civil remedy does not bar criminal proceedings for cognisable offences.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.