The Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the constitutional right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) protects creative expression. It ruled that neither the state nor non-state actors can use threats of violence to stop CBFC-certified films, as this would amount to anarchy and a negation of the rule of law.
Exam Lens
Quick Exam Facts From News
1-Minute Revision
- ›Judgment Date: February 19, 2026 (Order Pronounced)
- ›Justice: Ujjal Bhuyan
- ›Target this Legal Point: Article 19(1)(a) - Freedom of Speech and Expression
- ›Target this Nodal Body: Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC)
- ›Target this Principle: Threat of violence to stop a CBFC-certified film leads to 'anarchy' and negates the rule of law.
Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.
Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.