27 March 2026, Questions & Answers

Explanation

Article 110 of the Indian Constitution specifically defines a Money Bill. The Finance Bill, which contains tax proposals, is categorized as a Money Bill and can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect because the total expenditure of ₹453.47 lakh crore is a 7.7% increase, not a decrease. Statement 3 is incorrect as the fiscal deficit for FY27 is projected at 4.3%, which is lower than the 4.4% for FY26.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the fiscal deficit for FY27 is projected at 4.3% of GDP. The figure 4.4% is the deficit for the current fiscal year (FY26), making it a close distractor.

Explanation

The Finance Bill is a Money Bill under Article 110. The Rajya Sabha has limited powers; it can only discuss and make recommendations. It must return the Bill to the Lok Sabha within 14 days, and the Lok Sabha may accept or reject its recommendations. The Rajya Sabha cannot amend or reject it.

Explanation

The article explicitly states 'China’s military poses a serious challenge to India' and that India needs a strategy 'to deter the People’s Liberation Army (PLA).'

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article's description of the bold approach. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states the conservative strategy is 'more suited to fight a short war with Pakistan, not a protracted conflict.' Statement 3 is correct as it accurately describes the middle-path approach.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions 'C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance)' as a critical concern and states dominating the C4ISR battle is key.

Explanation

The article states: 'Strengthening India’s deterrence would mean altering China’s military confidence, while preventing it from assuming that any single capability could prove decisive.' This is achieved by creating and operationalising the enabling layers.

Explanation

Article 341 of the Constitution empowers the President to specify, by public notification, the castes, races or tribes which shall be deemed Scheduled Castes for the purposes of the Constitution. Article 342 is for Scheduled Tribes.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the 1950 Order was issued under Article 341, not Article 340 (which is for appointment of a commission to investigate conditions of backward classes). Statement 3 is correct as mentioned in the article.

Explanation

As per the article, the original 1950 Order included only Hindus. Sikhs were included in 1956, and Buddhists were included later in 1990 through amendments.

Explanation

The legal basis is purely statutory and constitutional. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, issued under Article 341, explicitly specifies the religions. The Court's role is to interpret this existing law, not to make theological judgments.

Explanation

As per the article, the Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam's implementation is tied to a delimitation exercise. The Delimitation Commission is the independent constitutional authority responsible for redrawing constituency boundaries based on population data, which is a prerequisite for allocating the reserved seats.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect because the article states the discourse began in the 1920s-30s, though it resurfaced in the 1970s. Statement 3 is incorrect; the article explicitly mentions that leaders like Sarojini Naidu repudiated the idea of reservation, fearing it would portray women as inferior.

Explanation

The article specifically mentions that women constituted 48.04% of India's total population at the time of Independence. This historical demographic fact was part of the argument for political reservation.

Explanation

The article details 'proxy representation' or 'Sarpanch-Pati' as a major lacuna, where women in reserved seats become tokens, and actual power is exercised by male family members, undermining the goal of substantive representation and perpetuating 'public patriarchy'.

Explanation

The Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015, is the international treaty that mandates countries to prepare, communicate, and maintain successive NDCs every five years. The UNFCCC is the parent treaty, but the NDC mechanism is specifically established under the Paris Agreement.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect. The target is for 60% of installed electricity capacity, not generation. Statement 2 is correct as per the article. Statement 3 is correct; the article mentions the US-Israeli war on Iran leading to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, creating energy security concerns.

Explanation

The article states that at the climate finance negotiations in Baku in 2024, developed countries agreed to raise about $300 billion a year for developing countries, but only from 2035. The $1.3 trillion option was the demand by developing countries.

Explanation

The article clearly links India's modest target enhancement to its disappointment with the climate finance outcome at COP29 in Baku, where developed countries pledged far less than what developing countries demanded. India argues that lack of adequate finance compels scaling down ambition.

Explanation

Article 341 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to specify, by public notification, the castes, races, or tribes which shall be deemed Scheduled Castes. This is the constitutional basis for the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, which is central to the news article.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the Court ruled the religion bar is "absolute". Statement 2 is incorrect; the Court held that conversion to Christianity results in immediate loss of SC status, irrespective of social discrimination. Statement 3 is correct as the article mentions the Scheduled Tribes Order does not prescribe religious exclusion.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that in October 2022, the Centre constituted a Commission of Inquiry headed by former Chief Justice of India K.G. Balakrishnan. The other names are former CJIs not mentioned in the article in this context.

Explanation

The article clearly states that the loss of SC status entails the automatic termination of all statutory benefits and protections, including those under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The other options are not mentioned or implied in the article.

Explanation

The article quotes Petroleum Minister Hardeep Singh Puri explaining the policy, and the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas is the nodal ministry for policies related to fuel pricing and excise duties on petroleum products in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect because the export duty was imposed on diesel and Aviation Turbine Fuel (ATF), not on petrol. Statement 3 is correct as per the estimate by Chief Economist Madhavi Arora mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article explicitly states: "a levy of Rs 21.5 per litre has been imposed on diesel, and Rs 29.5 per litre on ATF." The other options are distractors: Rs 10 is the SAED cut, Rs 21.5 is the duty on diesel, and Rs 30 is the per-litre loss on diesel sales for OMCs.

Explanation

The article clearly states the objective was "ensuring adequate availability of these fuels in the domestic market" and "disincentivising the exports." While the duties generate some revenue, the primary goal was supply management, not deficit elimination (option A). The article does not mention promoting alternatives (C) or direct price alignment (D).

Explanation

As per the article, a Bench of the Supreme Court headed by Justice Sanjay Karol directed its March 24 judgment to be sent to the Registrar Generals of State High Courts. The Supreme Court is the apex judicial body in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect because the punishment is 'rigorous imprisonment', not 'simple imprisonment'. Statement 2 is correct as the article states Section 228A IPC corresponds to Section 72 BNS. Statement 3 is correct as the 1983 reforms were triggered by the Mathura case.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the provision (Section 228A IPC/Section 72 BNS) makes the disclosure a criminal offence 'punishable with up to two years’ rigorous imprisonment'.

Explanation

The article states these reforms 'were designed to reduce the barriers and fears that previously discouraged survivors from reporting crimes and stifled effective prosecution'. This indicates a shift towards protecting and empowering victims, making the law more victim-centric.

Explanation

The article mentions Section 114 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which replaced the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 113A of the old Evidence Act dealt with the presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the SC cancelled the bail. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Court referred to the presumption under Section 114 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, not Section 304B IPC. Statement 3 is correct as per the final directions of the Court.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that according to the FIR, the bride's family had allegedly paid Rs 20 lakh in cash along with gold and silver worth Rs 6 lakh at the time of marriage.

Explanation

The Supreme Court stated the bail order was 'wholly unsustainable' and criticized the High Court for a 'mechanical approach' that failed to consider critical evidence, including the nature of injuries in the post-mortem report, focusing only on custody duration and slow trial pace.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that Narang is a senior fellow at the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. This is a key static GK fact about a prominent Indian defense and strategic affairs think tank.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect: The article clearly states the Shahed is a 'one-way drone' that does not return to base. Statement 2 is correct, as summed up by Reuters: 'Attacking has grown cheap while the relative cost of defending has skyrocketed.' Statement 3 is correct, as the article mentions Ukraine developed the 'Sting' interceptor drone worth $2,000-4,000.

Explanation

The article provides a direct comparison, stating: 'just keeping an F-16 in the air costs over $25,000 per hour.' This is a critical data point illustrating the operational cost imbalance against cheap drones.

Explanation

The article's core analysis is about the shifting economics of warfare. It repeatedly highlights the cost imbalance where cheap drones force the use of multi-million dollar defense systems, making such defense financially and logistically unsustainable in the long term, which is the primary strategic implication.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the analysis was conducted by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA). The other organizations, while prominent in the environmental research space, are not mentioned in the provided content.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article states emissions grew by 0.7% in 2025. Statement 2 is incorrect; the fall was due to record clean-energy growth (solar, wind) and weak electricity demand, not a decline in hydro/nuclear (which actually saw additions). Statement 3 is correct as explicitly mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article clearly states that India added 47 gigawatts (GW) of solar power capacity in 2025. 6.3 GW refers to wind capacity, 4.0 GW to hydropower, and 90 TWh (Terawatt-hours) refers to the annual electricity generation from the new clean capacity, not its power rating.

Explanation

The article defines the inflection point as a scenario where clean-energy additions can meet or exceed the growth in electricity demand, potentially leading to sustained falls in coal-fired power output and CO2 emissions. The other options describe more ambitious or unrelated outcomes not supported by the article's analysis.

Explanation

The article states that CBIC Chairman Vivek Chaturvedi announced the fortnightly review of the Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED). CBIC stands for Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, which administers indirect taxes in India.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect. The SAED is expected to generate ₹1,500 crore, not ₹7,000 crore (which is the revenue loss from the excise cut). Statement 2 is correct as per the article. Statement 3 is correct as it accurately describes the history of SAED.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the government has imposed an export duty of ₹29.5 per litre on ATF (Aviation Turbine Fuel). ₹21.5 is the duty on diesel, and ₹10 is the excise duty cut on petrol and diesel.

Explanation

As stated by CBIC Chairman Vivek Chaturvedi in the article, the move to levy SAED is 'to ensure domestic availability of diesel and ATF'. This is achieved by making exports less profitable, thereby discouraging them and retaining supply within the country.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the committee is chaired by BJP leader Aparajita Sarangi. Om Birla is the Lok Sabha Speaker, Amit Shah is the Home Minister who introduced the bills, and Narendra Modi is the Prime Minister.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect as the extension is until the Monsoon Session of 2026, not the Winter Session. Statement 2 is correct as per the article's description of the bills. Statement 3 is incorrect; the article states the bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha by the Home Minister.

Explanation

The article clearly mentions that the bills are for the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers and Ministers if they are under arrest for 30 consecutive days on serious charges. The other options are plausible distractors but not mentioned.

Explanation

The core objective of the bills, as described in the article, is to provide for the removal of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, and Ministers if they are under arrest for 30 consecutive days. This aims to address a gap in the current constitutional framework regarding executive accountability during incarceration.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the initiative is being taken up by nearly 15 States through the Union Ministries of Jal Shakti and Cooperation. While other ministries work on related areas like renewable energy (MNRE) or biofuels (MoPNG), the article specifies these two as the facilitating bodies for this model's adoption.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article: 'The existing plant... has been operational... with a daily processing capacity of 40 metric tonnes of dung.' Statement 2 is incorrect; the article clearly states farmers are paid ₹1 per kg of dung, not ₹2. Statement 3 is correct: 'New plants are designed to handle about 100 metric tonnes per day.' Hence, only statements 1 and 3 are correct.

Explanation

The article directly states: 'The project is expected to reduce carbon emissions by approximately 6,750 tonnes annually.' The other options are plausible distractors but do not match the specific figure provided in the content.

Explanation

The article states the initiative 'aims to integrate clean energy production with the dairy sector while providing additional income opportunities in rural areas.' While organic fertiliser is a by-product, export is not mentioned as a primary goal. Replacing all natural gas or centralising national dung collection are extreme interpretations not supported by the article's focus on local, scalable models.

Explanation

As per the article, the Bill was tabled on March 13 by Union Minister for Social Justice and Empowerment Virender Kumar. This ministry is the nodal agency for policies related to the welfare of transgender persons.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the Bill inserts a medical board headed by a chief medical officer. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article explicitly states the definition excludes 'self-perceived sexual identities'. Statement 3 is correct as the penalty for a child victim is 'mandatory life and a minimum Rs 5 lakh fine'.

Explanation

The article states: 'kidnapping an adult and causing grievous injury for this purpose carries 10 years to life imprisonment and a minimum Rs 2 lakh fine'. The other amounts are distractors; ₹5 lakh is the fine for a child victim.

Explanation

As per the article, the introduction of the medical board has been termed 'medical gatekeeping' by activists like Mumbai Queer Pride, who stated it was designed to erase transgender persons under the guise of 'medical scrutiny'. This directly challenges the right to self-determination affirmed in the NALSA judgment.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the right to die with dignity is an integral part of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. Article 14 deals with equality, Article 19 with freedoms, and Article 32 with remedies for enforcing fundamental rights.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is also correct; the 2018 Common Cause judgment was by a Constitution Bench and upheld advance directives. Statement 3 is incorrect because the article repeatedly highlights the absence of a comprehensive law, with the SC guidelines being interim measures awaiting parliamentary legislation.

Explanation

The article states: "a young man who had remained in a persistent vegetative state for more than 13 years." The other options are plausible but incorrect distractors based on the specific factual detail provided.

Explanation

The article specifically discusses the need for a "nationally accessible digital registry of living wills" to ensure documents can be located when needed, especially if treatment is required in a different city. The other options are incorrect: living wills are judicially recognized (Common Cause case), there is no constitutional bar (right is upheld under Article 21), and the article discusses family consent in the absence of a directive, not an override.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that US Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby's recent remarks in New Delhi clarify the evolving character of India-US relations. The other officials, while important, are not mentioned in this context.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect. The article clearly states the framework is 'not rooted in legacy ideas of partnership' and that assumptions about 'moral positioning' are less useful. Statements 2 and 3 are correct as per the article's description of the US aligning instruments of power and seeking 'alignment without formal alliance structures'.

Explanation

The article's second paragraph begins: 'US Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby’s recent remarks in New Delhi clarify...' This provides the specific location of the remarks.

Explanation

The article's 'Politically, this shift creates new pressures' section explicitly states that sections of industry, agriculture, and strategic communities may respond adversely to perceived concessions, making managing these responses a challenge. The other options are not mentioned as specific challenges in the article.

Explanation

SIPRI, based in Stockholm, is an independent institute focused on conflict and disarmament research. The article explicitly mentions SIPRI publishing the data on March 9, 2026.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect; the increase was between 2021–2025 compared to 2016–2020, not between those two periods. Statement 2 is correct as Lasswell introduced the concept in 1941. Statement 3 is correct as Ukraine and India are listed among the top five recipients.

Explanation

The article states that the US has a 42% share of total global arms exports. 27% is the increase in US exports, 35% is the share received by the top five recipients, and 70% is the share of the top five suppliers.

Explanation

Lasswell's garrison state is characterized by the overwhelming power of 'specialists on violence' within state institutions, with security prioritized over socio-political concerns, as defined in the article.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the Kerala High Court delivered the judgment regarding the Knanaya community's practice. The community is based in Kerala, making its High Court the natural forum.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the judgment explicitly declares the right to marry as a fundamental right. Statement 2 is incorrect; the court struck down the bye-law, declaring it void. Statement 3 is correct as the article mentions the court quoted this specific line from the Bible.

Explanation

The article clearly states that the Papal Bull was issued by Pope Pius X in the year 1911, which led to the creation of the Kottayam Diocese. The other options are incorrect historical distractors.

Explanation

The core of the judgment is that fundamental rights (like the right to marry) are enforceable and cannot be infringed upon by religious institutions (non-state actors). The court stated that the 'principle that fundamental rights are enforceable even in the interstices of non-state action stands firmly affirmed'.

Explanation

Article 194 of the Constitution specifically deals with the powers, privileges, and immunities of State Legislatures and their members. It states these shall be those of the House of Commons of the UK Parliament at the commencement of the Constitution, which is the legal basis cited by the Gujarat Assembly Secretariat.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect because the article states the Assembly provides a daily program 'Lokshahi Na Dhabkara' on TV and documents on NeVA. Statement 2 is correct as per the affidavit citing Section 8. Statement 3 is correct as the article clarifies NeVA is used for documents, and the lack of livestreaming is the core issue.

Explanation

The article explicitly states: 'The PIL has been pending in the court for six years now.' It was filed in 2020, and the hearing date mentioned is March 2026, confirming the six-year duration.

Explanation

The article details that the Assembly's defense relies on the privileges of the UK House of Commons, which are applicable to Indian legislatures via Article 194 of the Constitution. This includes the privilege to control or prohibit the publication of its proceedings, as argued in their affidavit.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the hydrogen trainset was developed by the Chennai-based Integral Coach Factory (ICF). RDSO conducted the oscillation trial, but ICF is the developer.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article says it is the world's longest (10 coaches) hydrogen trainset, not shortest. Statement 3 is correct as mentioned in the article. Hence, both 1 and 3 are correct.

Explanation

The article states that the trainset is the most powerful with 2400 kW, comprising two Driving Power Cars (DPCs) of 1200 kW each. The other options are distractors.

Explanation

The core environmental benefit of hydrogen fuel cell technology, as stated in the article, is zero CO2 emissions. The only by-product is water vapour, making it a clean alternative to diesel or coal-based power.

Explanation

Excise duty (now subsumed under Central GST for most goods but still applicable on petroleum products) is a levy imposed by the Central Government under the Central Excise Act, 1944. Petroleum products are currently outside the GST regime.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct: The article states the Finance Bill was returned by the Upper House (Rajya Sabha) with a voice vote. Statement 2 is incorrect: Diesel duty was removed entirely, from ₹10 to ₹0 per litre, not reduced to ₹3. Statement 3 is correct: The Finance Minister attributed the price surge to the West Asia conflict and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz.

Explanation

The Finance Minister, while addressing concerns about revenue loss from excise duty cuts, stated the government aims to ensure a fiscal deficit of 4.3% of GDP. The other options are common fiscal deficit targets used as distractors.

Explanation

The Finance Minister explicitly stated that the decision was taken on the Prime Minister's guidance that "there shouldn't be a burden on the citizens" and to ensure "volatility outside does not hit the ordinary citizen." The other options are not mentioned as primary reasons in the article.

Explanation

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) is the highest decision-making body in the Ministry of Defence for capital acquisition proposals. It is headed by the Defence Minister and grants the Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), as mentioned in the article regarding the ₹2.38 lakh crore approvals.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article states DAC cleared proposals worth about ₹2.38 lakh crore, including five additional S-400 systems. Statement 2 is incorrect; the remotely piloted strike aircraft is a programme of the DRDO (Defence Research and Development Organisation), not a joint venture with the US. Statement 3 is correct as AoN was accorded for heavy duty air cushion vehicles for the Coast Guard.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that in the 2025-26 financial year, the DAC accorded Acceptance of Necessity for 55 proposals amounting to ₹6.73 lakh crore. ₹2.38 lakh crore is the value of the specific approvals mentioned in the news, ₹2.28 lakh crore is the value of capital contracts signed, and $5.43 billion is the value of the original 2018 S-400 deal.

Explanation

The Ministry of Defence statement, as quoted in the article, notes that the S-400s will 'counter enemy long-range air vectors targeting vital areas.' This defines its primary role as a defensive, area-denial system against airborne threats like aircraft and missiles, not offensive strike or electronic warfare.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that Special 301 investigations are conducted by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR). This is the statutory body under U.S. trade law tasked with investigating unfair foreign trade practices.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; Section 122 tariffs can be applied for no more than 150 days and cannot exceed 15%. Statement 3 is incorrect; the article states Indian and American positions are "not aligned" on this issue.

Explanation

The article specifies that tariffs applied under Section 122 "cannot exceed 15% as per law." The other options are distractors; 10% is the current universal tariff rate mentioned, while 12% and 20% are not referenced.

Explanation

The article clearly identifies pulses market access and the 'staging' (speed) of tariff reductions as key gaps in the negotiations. The other options, while potential trade issues, are not mentioned as the specific gaps in this article.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions the NALSA Vs. Union of India judgment in 2014 recognized the right of transgender persons to self-identify their gender. The Navtej Singh Johar case (2018) dealt with Section 377 decriminalization.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article: the Bill limits definition to socio-cultural identities and intersex variations. Statement 2 is correct: it mandates a Medical Board, replacing self-declaration. Statement 3 is incorrect: Karnataka introduced 1% reservation in 2021, years before the 2026 Bill.

Explanation

The article states: 'According to the 2011 Census, Karnataka is home to 20,266 transgender persons.' The other figures are close distractors; 30,000 is the approximate number of transgender cards issued nationally.

Explanation

The article explains that the offence of 'enticement' to assume a transgender identity could criminalize the support provided by community elders and organizations to individuals forced out of their homes, as highlighted by lawyer Arvind Narrain.

Explanation

The Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) is the nodal ministry for climate change policy and international negotiations, including the submission of NDCs under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the updated 2035 NDC. Statement 2 is incorrect; the reduction is from 2005 levels, not 2025 levels. Statement 3 is correct as the article states India met its 2030 non-fossil target (50%) last year (2025).

Explanation

The article explicitly states that India's latest NDC commits to having a '3.5 billion tonne-4 billion tonne CO2 carbon sink' by 2035. The 2.5-3 Bn tonne target was part of the 2020 NDC.

Explanation

The article directly attributes the gap ('the rub is that only about 25% of the power generated is non-fossil') to 'insufficient battery storage which is unable to harness all the available solar and wind power', highlighting a critical infrastructure challenge.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) cleared the proposal on March 17, 2026. The CCI is responsible for reviewing mergers and acquisitions to ensure they do not adversely affect competition in the market.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect as per capita private health expenditure increased from ₹7,636 (2013-14) to ₹13,343 (2021-22). Statement 2 is correct as per the National Health Accounts Report cited. Statement 3 is correct as government share increased from 24% (2013-14) to 32.5% (2021-22).

Explanation

The article clearly states the per capita private health expenditure in Kerala was ₹13,343 for 2021-22, as per the National Health Accounts Report. ₹7,636 is the figure for 2013-14, while ₹10,000 is an anecdotal bill amount mentioned, and ₹18,000 is a distractor.

Explanation

The article, referencing a UNU-IIGH background paper, states that corporatisation introduces a layer of managerial oversight driven by business principles, which often limits doctors' professional autonomy. This leads to revenue-linked targets. The other options are contradicted: small hospitals are shutting down, costs are rising, and the number of large corporate hospitals is increasing.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that India's renewable sector attracted private capital due to predictable policies and actions through the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI).

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the article proposes a revised RE target of 1500 GW by 2030. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article calls for full electrification of new two-wheelers and three-wheelers by 2030, not 2035. Statement 3 is correct as it mentions India's ambition to reach 100 GW of nuclear capacity by 2047.

Explanation

The article states a key structural reality: "For a country that imports over 85 per cent of its crude oil, geopolitical volatility is not an external risk." This is a critical data point for understanding India's energy insecurity.

Explanation

The article directly states: "The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for advanced chemistry cells has not succeeded and must be urgently restructured." It further says underperformance must be addressed, making this the core reason for the proposed restructuring.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court delivered the judgment directing compensation. This is the common high court for the two Union Territories.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect as the compensation was Rs 2 lakh *each* for three children (total Rs 6 lakh), not Rs 2 lakh in total. Statement 2 is incorrect as the court explicitly rejected the defense of parental negligence. Statement 3 is correct as the judgment states the failure constitutes a breach of duty resulting in violation of Article 21.

Explanation

The court directed the UT administration to pay Rs 2 lakh compensation *each* for the three children. Therefore, the total compensation amounts to Rs 6 lakh. Rs 15 lakh was the amount initially sought by the father.

Explanation

The core of the judgment is that public authorities owe a 'duty of care' to citizens. Their failure to adopt basic precautions (like proper fencing) around hazardous structures constitutes a breach of this duty, which results in a violation of the fundamental right to life under Article 21.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions the 'Doha Declaration, adopted by the World Trade Organisation in 2001, permits countries to relax patent rules to counter major public health threats.' This is a key static GK point linking trade rules to public health.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states the common side effect in 25-40% of users is sarcopenia (muscle loss), while pancreatitis is listed as a potential but not the most common adverse effect. Statement 3 is correct as the article says 'recent prescribing restrictions imposed by the Director General of Health Services are justified.'

Explanation

The article provides a specific data point: 'Together, they are the leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for 23,000,000 to 25,000,000 deaths annually.' This is a precise figure crucial for prelims factual recall.

Explanation

The article argues that 'prescriptions by doctors or dieticians who are not well versed with the effects of these drugs will pose dangers of misuse.' Therefore, the DGHS restrictions are a regulatory measure grounded in safety and prudence, not profit, supply limitation, or research.

Explanation

The article explicitly lists Sun Pharma, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Zydus Lifesciences, and Lupin as firms moving to launch generic versions. Cipla is not mentioned in the provided content.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the pre-expiry cost was Rs 8,500 to over Rs 16,000, while Rs 1,500–5,000 is the projected post-expiry generic cost. Statement 3 is a correct description of GLP-1 therapies as mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article states that with the entry of generic versions, costs are projected to 'plummet by 50-80 per cent'. The other options are plausible but incorrect distractors.

Explanation

The article's core argument is that affordable generics can help manage diabetes/obesity early, preventing costly complications like heart and kidney disease, thus shifting the system from reactive treatment of complications to preventive care. While export potential is mentioned, it is not the primary public health benefit.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions that the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP RERA) has notified the 10th amendment to its General Regulations, 2019.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article. Statement 2 is incorrect; the amendments were issued under Section 85, not Section 80. Statement 3 is incorrect; the fee for a family member successor is capped at ₹1,000, not ₹25,000.

Explanation

The article clearly states: 'If the transfer is made in favour of a person other than a family member, the promoter can charge a maximum processing fee of Rs 25,000.'

Explanation

The article states the amendments aim 'to protect consumer interests and enhance transparency in the state’s real estate sector,' specifically by clarifying provisions for allottees of unregistered projects.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the UN Security Council scheduled closed consultations on Iran for Friday, March 27, 2026. This is a direct factual recall from the news content.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article: the U.S. delivered a 15-point 'action list' using Pakistan as an intermediary. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states Iran rejected the U.S. offer. Statement 3 is correct as Iran's own five-point proposal included recognition of its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

Explanation

The article specifies that a group of U.S. ships drew closer to the region with some 2,500 Marines. The other figures are distractors; 1,000 refers to the paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne also mentioned.

Explanation

The article states that Iran's control of the Strait 'appears part of a strategy to get the U.S. to back down by roiling the world economy.' This indicates the objective is coercive diplomacy through economic pressure, not merely revenue generation or regional blockade.

Explanation

The ASHA programme is a key component of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), which falls under the purview of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Anganwadi workers, mentioned alongside ASHAs in the article, are under the Ministry of Women and Child Development.

Explanation

Statements 1 and 2 are correct as per the article's data. Statement 3 is incorrect. The article states that despite a 2025 adjustment, the fixed monthly honorarium for ASHAs remains at around ₹3,500, indicating stagnation rather than a significant increase.

Explanation

The article explicitly mentions that there are over 13 lakh Anganwadi workers providing last-mile healthcare in India. The strength of ASHA workers is over 10 lakh, a common distractor.

Explanation

The article's core argument is that 'dashboard governance' uses technology to replace trust with objectives and measurement with engagement. This leads to an extraction model where the unpaid labor of frontline workers is used to mine data, shifting focus from care delivery to data entry and performance alerts.

Explanation

The article explicitly names SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) as China's largest chipmaker accused by U.S. officials of supplying chipmaking tools to Iran's military. Huawei is mentioned as a customer of SMIC, not the accused supplier.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article which states the collaboration 'almost certainly included technical training'. Statement 2 is incorrect because SMIC was added to the blacklist in 2020, not 2024 (2024 is when the Biden administration tightened restrictions). Statement 3 is correct as the article states the war was 'launched by the U.S. and Israel on February 28'.

Explanation

The article clearly states: 'SMIC, which was added to a trade blacklist in 2020 that restricts its access to U.S. exports...'. The year 2024 is a distractor, as it is mentioned for tightened restrictions, not the initial blacklisting.

Explanation

The article quotes an official stating the tools 'could be used for any electronics that require chips.' Advanced semiconductors are critical for modern military systems, including drones, missiles, and communication devices. The other options are not supported by the article's content.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the low-altitude economy was mentioned in China's Government Work Report released on March 5, 2026. This report is the annual policy document of the Chinese government.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the founder emphasizes meaningful competition lies in technology, not price alone. Statement 2 is incorrect; the article states that new automakers from the Internet have this inherent DNA, while traditional automakers build from hardware to software. Statement 3 is correct as per the article's discussion on embodied intelligence.

Explanation

The article clearly states that China's EV penetration rate reached 57% in 2025. This is a key data point highlighting the maturity of the Chinese EV market.

Explanation

The founder explicitly states that one key reason for their success is the popularisation of high-level intelligent driving, achieved by sticking to full-stack, in-house R&D. This shifts competition from price to technology and long-term value.

Explanation

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway that connects the Gulf of Oman (to the east) with the Persian Gulf (to the west). It is bordered by Iran and Oman. This geographical fact is crucial for understanding its strategic importance in global energy transit.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect. The article highlights the most acute shortages are in oil derivatives like naphtha, not crude oil itself. Statement 2 is incorrect as the article states Asia relies MORE heavily on West Asian supplies. Statement 3 is correct, as explicitly mentioned regarding ramen noodle packaging.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that "roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas normally passes" through the Strait of Hormuz. This is a key factual data point for Prelims-style questions on global geography and energy security.

Explanation

The article's core analysis revolves around the disruption of naphtha supply from the Gulf. This shortage cascades into production cuts for plastics and synthetic rubber, impacting a vast array of consumer goods across Asia, making it the most significant immediate economic impact.

Explanation

As per the Panchayati Raj system, the Gram Sabha consists of all adult members of a village, and the Gram Panchayat (the executive body) is responsible for managing and controlling the Gram Sabha's property, including common land.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as the land was recorded as 'Khalihan' (threshing floor), a type of Gram Sabha land. Statement 2 is incorrect because the court set aside the ₹36,000 penalty, finding no evidence linking the petitioners to the construction. Statement 3 is correct as the court observed that Rules 66 and 67 of the UP Revenue Code Rules were followed.

Explanation

The article clearly states that the district authorities had imposed a penalty of ₹36,000, which the Allahabad High Court set aside because there was no material to link the petitioners to the construction or occupation of the mosque.

Explanation

The court's reasoning, as quoted in the article ("Petitioners were unable to demonstrate that they had any right, title, or interest in the said land"), reinforces the core property law principle that lawful occupation requires a demonstrable legal title or interest. This principle applies uniformly to all types of encroachments.

Explanation

The central excise duty is a form of taxation under the Union List. Tax policy, including rates of excise duty, falls under the purview of the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue). The Petroleum Ministry manages supply and operations of OMCs.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article: duty was cut from ₹13 to ₹3, a reduction of ₹10. Statement 2 is incorrect; the objective is to protect consumers and OMCs, not increase revenue (the government is taking a 'huge hit' on revenues). Statement 3 is correct as the article mentions an export tax was levied on ATF to ensure its domestic availability.

Explanation

The article explicitly states that the excise duty on diesel is now zero, down from the previous ₹10 per litre. ₹3 per litre is the new rate for petrol, while ₹10 and ₹13 are the previous rates for diesel and petrol respectively.

Explanation

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman stated, "We have raised the excise duty on export of ATF to ensure its availability in the country." This is a supply-side measure to discourage exports when international prices are high, thereby prioritizing domestic supply and energy security.

Explanation

The article explicitly states the court exercised its "inherent power" under Section 482 of the CrPC to prevent abuse of the process of law. This section grants High Courts inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.

Explanation

Statement 1 is incorrect: The article states the victim understood the appellant as her husband and led a conjugal life, but there is no mention of marriage. Statement 2 is correct: The court upheld the guilt under Section 6. Statement 3 is correct: The court explicitly criticized the state's failure to provide social security.

Explanation

The article clearly states the trial court sentenced him to "20 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 20,000" under Section 6 for aggravated penetrative sexual assault. This is the mandatory minimum prescribed under POCSO.

Explanation

The court's order states that due to the state's failure to provide any social security, and the victim's deposition, they were exercising inherent power "to prevent the abuse of the process of law". The other options are either incorrect (consent of minor is never valid) or secondary facts mentioned in the article.

Explanation

The article explicitly states the report is on the 'Demands for Grants (2026–27) of the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH)'. Road safety and black spot rectification fall under the mandate of this ministry.

Explanation

Statement 1 is correct as per the article's definition. Statement 2 is correct as eDAR is mentioned for black-spot identification. Statement 3 is incorrect: 16,500 spots were identified, and long-term measures were introduced for 6,650 spots, which is less than half (approximately 40%).

Explanation

The article clearly states that '16,500 accident-prone black spots have been identified across the country based on 2016-2023 data.' The figure 14,138 refers to spots where short-term rectification was implemented, making it a close distractor.

Explanation

The committee's core concern was the lack of verification for treated black spots. It specifically recommended 'a structured Post-Rectification Safety Audit' to assess if accident rates have reduced and to reclassify failing spots for higher-order solutions. The other options are not mentioned as primary recommendations.