PolityHistory
News 1 of 18

Allahabad HC Verdict (12 June 1975) in Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain: Legal Prelude to Emergency

Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCTeachingSSC GAPrelims HighMains HighStatic GK Link
27 Jun 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Key Data:12 June 197525 June 197524 June 1975Rae Bareli1,83,309 votes71,499 votes
Bodies:Allahabad High CourtSupreme Court of IndiaParliamentPresident of India
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Allahabad HC set aside Indira Gandhi's 1971 Lok Sabha election from Rae Bareli due to corrupt practice involving government official Yashpal Kapoor.

2.The verdict (12 June 1975) triggered political crisis; Opposition demanded resignation, leading to proclamation of Emergency on 25 June 1975.

3.The Supreme Court in 1975 upheld election law changes but struck down immunity for PM's election from judicial review (basic structure doctrine).

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · High

On 12 June 1975, the Allahabad High Court set aside PM Indira Gandhi's 1971 election victory on grounds of corrupt practice, triggering a political crisis that led to the Emergency on 25 June 1975. This case (Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain) is a must-know for understanding the constitutional and political context of the Emergency.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

CaseIndira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
CourtAllahabad High Court (Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha)
Verdict Date12 June 1975
Electoral ConstituencyRae Bareli (UP)
Corrupt PracticeAssistance from government servant (Yashpal Kapoor)
Emergency Proclamation25 June 1975
Supreme Court Stay24 June 1975 (Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer)

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Case: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain
  • ›Court: Allahabad High Court (Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha)
  • ›Target this Data: 12 June 1975 (Allahabad HC verdict), 25 June 1975 (Emergency proclamation)
  • ›Target this Case: Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
  • ›Target this Legal Point: Section 123 of RPA, 1951 (corrupt practice) and Article 352 (Emergency)

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Act was the election petition filed by Raj Narain challenging Indira Gandhi's election?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements:

1. The Allahabad HC set aside Indira Gandhi's election on grounds of corrupt practice involving Yashpal Kapoor.

2. The Supreme Court allowed Indira Gandhi to continue as PM but restricted her rights as an MP.

3. The 39th Amendment completely immunized the election of the Prime Minister from judicial review without any changes.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date did Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha deliver the verdict setting aside Indira Gandhi's election?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary constitutional consequence of the 39th Amendment related to the Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain case?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Justice Liberhan Commission: Babri Masjid Demolition Was a Well-Planned Civil Conspiracy

Justice Manmohan Singh Liberhan, head of the one-man Commission of Inquiry into the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition, passed away. His 2009 report concluded the demolition was a meticulously planned civil conspiracy involving RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal, BJP, and Shiv Sena — a finding he never retracted despite the 2020 CBI court acquittals.

Social Issues Current Affairs

Allahabad HC Dismisses Hijab Petition: Muslim Girls' Enrolment Drops from 18% to 12.9% in Higher Secondary

The Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition seeking permission to wear a headscarf in school, upholding uniform dress code. However, the case highlights a deeper issue: Muslim girls' enrollment in schools drops sharply from 18% at primary level to just 12.9% at higher secondary (UDISE+ 2024-25). The article argues that strict uniform rules, when applied without accommodation, may become a barrier to education for Muslim girls, referencing the Supreme Court's split verdict in the hijab case and the Sachar Committee's findings on cultural hostility.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Strength Increased to 38 Judges: Will It Reduce Pendency and Free Up Constitution Benches?

Parliament has passed a bill increasing Supreme Court judge strength from 34 to 38, aimed at enabling regular Constitution Benches and reducing case backlog (92,101 cases pending as of Jan 1, 2026). However, past Law Commission reports question if more judges alone can solve pendency, and the real impact depends on filling vacancies and judicial management.

Polity Current Affairs

Article 249 Extended to J&K via 1954 Order Amendment Amid Suspended Assembly

This 1986 event shows how the Centre used Article 249 to legislate for J&K during President's Rule, highlighting the constitutional mechanism for central intervention in state subjects. Essential for understanding J&K's pre-370 abrogation dynamics and the application of Article 249 in national interest.

Polity Current Affairs

President Murmu Assents to Anti-Paper Leak Bill: 5-10 Years Jail, ₹50 Lakh Fine, Fast-Track Courts

President Droupadi Murmu has given assent to the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, introducing stricter punishments (5-10 years jail, fines up to ₹50 lakh for individuals, ₹10 crore for organized crime) and mandatory fast-track courts for trials within 3 months. This comes after NEET 2026 paper leak protests.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Tells SC Creamy Layer Cannot Apply to SC/ST Quotas, Cites Historical Disadvantage

The Centre has opposed extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST reservations, arguing that historical discrimination based on untouchability cannot be equated with economic backwardness. The affidavit also asserts that any change in reservation policy is Parliament's domain, not the courts. This is critical for understanding the distinction between SC/ST and OBC reservation criteria.

Culture & History Current Affairs

Communal Award 1932: Gandhi Fast vs Ambedkar on Separate Electorates, Poona Pact Outcome

In 1932, the British Communal Award granted separate electorates to Depressed Classes, pitting Gandhi (who saw it as a threat to Hindu unity) against Ambedkar (who saw it as essential for political representation). Gandhi's fast-unto-death forced the Poona Pact, which replaced separate electorates with increased reserved seats — a system India retains today. This is a landmark event in India's constitutional history and a frequent UPSC/MPSC exam topic.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Quashes All NEET Protest FIRs Under CJI Surya Kant; Raises Selective Justice Issue on Right to Peaceful Protest

The Supreme Court quashed all FIRs against NEET student protesters, affirming the constitutional right to peaceful protest. However, the editorial raises concerns about selective justice, noting that cases against factory workers, CAA protesters, and farmers remain pending, potentially criminalizing dissent based on the protester's identity.