PolityGovernance
News 13 of 29

Former CJI Gavai Tells JPC Simultaneous Polls Bill Does Not Violate Constitution's Basic Structure

PolityCORE
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
12 Feb 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:December 17, 2024February 12, 2026Article 129 Amendment Bill 2024
Bodies:Election CommissionSupreme CourtJoint Parliamentary Committee (JPC)Parliament
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Former CJI B.R. Gavai told the JPC that the Bill for simultaneous Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections does not violate the basic structure doctrine, as it only changes the manner of elections.

2.Opinions are split among six former CJIs consulted: Justices U.U. Lalit and Sanjiv Khanna argue it violates the basic structure, while Justices Ranjan Gogoi, D.Y. Chandrachud, J.S. Khehar, and B.R. Gavai say it does not.

3.The JPC, reviewing the Bill introduced on December 17, 2024, is also considering suggestions for a common electoral roll for all tiers of elections to reduce administrative burden.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

A Parliamentary Joint Committee (JPC) is reviewing the Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024 for simultaneous elections. Former CJI B.R. Gavai has opined it does not violate the Constitution's basic structure, joining three other former CJIs, while two others have opposed it on the same grounds.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Bill Under ReviewConstitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024
Bill Introduction DateDecember 17, 2024
JPC ChairmanBJP MP P.P. Chaudhary
Meeting DateFebruary 12, 2026
Former CJIs Opposing BillJustices U.U. Lalit and Sanjiv Khanna
Former CJIs Supporting BillJustices Ranjan Gogoi, D.Y. Chandrachud, J.S. Khehar, and B.R. Gavai

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Bill Under Review: Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024
  • ›Bill Introduction Date: December 17, 2024
  • ›Target this Data: The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024 was introduced on December 17, 2024.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) reviewing the Bill is headed by BJP MP P.P. Chaudhary.
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The legal debate centers on violation of the 'Basic Structure Doctrine' established in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973).

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which parliamentary body is currently reviewing the Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024, on simultaneous elections?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding opinions on the simultaneous elections Bill:

1. Former CJI B.R. Gavai stated that the Bill does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution.

2. Former CJI U.U. Lalit argued that the Bill would withstand any legal challenge in the Supreme Court.

3. All former CJIs who deposed before the JPC unanimously questioned the unrestricted power given to the Election Commission in the Bill.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

On which date was the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024, introduced in the Lok Sabha?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was a key administrative rationale, mentioned by JPC Chairman P.P. Chaudhary, for suggesting a common electoral roll?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

One Nation One Election: Simultaneous Lok Sabha and State Assembly Polls Possible by 2029 - JPC Chairman Chaudhary

The JPC on 'One Nation, One Election' has indicated that simultaneous Lok Sabha and State Assembly polls are feasible by 2029 if the Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024 is passed by 2028 and state governments voluntarily dissolve their assemblies. This is a major structural reform that revives the pre-1967 electoral cycle, with 99% public support claimed by the panel.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Split Verdict on CEC/EC Appointment Act, 2023; Matter Referred to CJI for Constitution Bench

A two-judge Supreme Court bench has split on whether to refer the challenge to the CEC and ECs (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023 to a five-judge Constitution Bench. With Justice Dipankar Datta disagreeing with Justice S C Sharma, the case now goes to the CJI for constituting a larger bench. For aspirants, this is a direct link to Article 324, the Anoop Baranwal verdict, and the independence of the Election Commission.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Refers Challenge to 2023 EC Appointment Law to 5-Judge Constitution Bench

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of Election Commissioners to a 5-judge Constitution Bench after a split verdict. The law replaced the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister in the selection committee, raising concerns about executive dominance and independence of the Election Commission. This case is crucial for exam aspirants as it involves constitutional principles of independence of constitutional bodies and separation of powers.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Refers 2023 CEC Appointment Law to CJI for Constitution Bench; Excludes CJI from Selection Panel

The Supreme Court has referred the challenge to the 2023 law on appointment of CEC and ECs to the CJI for consideration of a Constitution Bench. The law replaced the CJI with a Cabinet minister in the selection panel, raising concerns about executive influence. A split verdict between two judges led to the referral.

Polity Current Affairs

Centre Tells SC Creamy Layer Cannot Apply to SC/ST Quotas, Cites Historical Disadvantage

The Centre has opposed extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST reservations, arguing that historical discrimination based on untouchability cannot be equated with economic backwardness. The affidavit also asserts that any change in reservation policy is Parliament's domain, not the courts. This is critical for understanding the distinction between SC/ST and OBC reservation criteria.

Polity Current Affairs

AP High Court Declares Three-Capitals Petitions Infructuous; Amaravati Now Sole Capital Under AP Reorganisation (Amendment) Act 2026

The Andhra Pradesh High Court has deemed all petitions against the proposed three-capitals model as infructuous after Parliament amended the AP Reorganisation Act, 2014, making Amaravati the sole capital by law. This ends a long-standing political and legal battle, with implications for state governance and federal structure.

Polity Current Affairs

Govt to SC: Only Parliament Can Extend Creamy Layer to SC/ST; Cites Article 341, E V Chinnaiah Case

The government has told the Supreme Court that extending the creamy layer principle to SC/ST is a policy decision for Parliament alone. This reaffirms that reservation for SC/ST is based on historical social criteria, not just economic status, and the creamy layer concept currently applies only to OBCs.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliament Increases Supreme Court Judges Strength from 34 to 38 via Amendment Bill, 2026

Parliament has increased the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges (including CJI) for the first time since 2019. The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, was passed by Lok Sabha on August 3, 2026, replacing an ordinance. The move aims to address the growing backlog of cases in the apex court.