PolityJudiciary
News 0 of 22

Supreme Court Justice BV Nagarathna Calls for Weeding Out Corrupt Judges, Emphasizes Independence from AI Influence

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCPrelims MediumMains HighStatic GK Link
18 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: Indian Express
Bodies:Supreme Court
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.Justice BV Nagarathna stated that judges who succumb to greed and cannot live within their known income must be removed from the judiciary.

2.She emphasized that judges must be free from external pressures and colleagues, and that decisions should not be made through 'coordination'.

3.She also highlighted the threat of AI to judicial independence, stating that judges must retain control over reasoning to prevent algorithmic influence.

The Big Picture
Prelims · MediumMains · High

Justice BV Nagarathna of the Supreme Court delivers a strong message on judicial integrity and independence, warning against corruption and the subtle influence of Artificial Intelligence on judicial reasoning.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

SpeakerJustice BV Nagarathna (Supreme Court)
Event22nd Biennial State-Level Conference of Judicial Officers, Bengaluru
Key Quote"Judges who are unable to live within their known sources of income and fall prey to greed and temptation must be weeded out."
Topic of Speech"Reimagining the Judiciary in the Era of Artificial Intelligence"

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Speaker: Justice BV Nagarathna (Supreme Court)
  • ›Event: 22nd Biennial State-Level Conference of Judicial Officers, Bengaluru
  • ›Target this Quote: "Judges who are unable to live within their known sources of income... must be weeded out."
  • ›Target this Venue: 22nd Biennial State-Level Conference of Judicial Officers, Bengaluru.
  • ›Target this Concept: Judicial independence must include freedom from algorithmic (AI) influence.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Which constitutional principle is most directly invoked by Justice Nagarathna's emphasis on judges being free from external pressures?

Q2Statement-basedMedium

Consider the following statements regarding Justice BV Nagarathna's speech:

1. She stated that judges succumbing to greed must be removed from the system.

2. She emphasized that judges must be free from pressure from their colleagues.

3. She argued that Artificial Intelligence should replace human judges to ensure efficiency.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricEasy

At which event did Justice BV Nagarathna deliver the speech discussed in the article?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

According to Justice Nagarathna, what is a key threat posed by Artificial Intelligence to the judiciary?

All 25 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Parliament Increases Supreme Court Judges Strength from 34 to 38 via Amendment Bill, 2026

Parliament has increased the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38 judges (including CJI) for the first time since 2019. The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, was passed by Lok Sabha on August 3, 2026, replacing an ordinance. The move aims to address the growing backlog of cases in the apex court.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Questions Fairness of PM-Led Panel for CEC Appointment Under 2023 Act

The Supreme Court has questioned whether the selection of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners by a PM-led committee (with a Union Minister and LoP) demonstrates 'fairness'. The Centre defended the process citing constitutional trust, but the court hinted at the need for a more independent mechanism. This is crucial for understanding the debate on institutional independence and the Election Commission's autonomy.

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.

Polity Current Affairs

SC Collegium Elevates 4 Judges as Chief Justices: Justice V. Kameswar Rao to Patna HC

The Supreme Court Collegium, led by CJI Surya Kant, has recommended the elevation of four High Court judges as Chief Justices of different high courts and the transfer of two judges. This highlights the Collegium's role in judicial appointments and transfers, a key topic for UPSC Polity and Governance.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Dismisses 2017 PIL to Abolish Hanging Execution; Centre May Review Alternatives

The Supreme Court dismissed a 2017 PIL seeking to replace hanging with less painful methods like lethal injection, but allowed the Centre to form an expert body to review execution methods. The judgment references the Law Commission's 187th Report and emphasizes preserving dignity while minimizing pain.