PolityGovernance
News 23 of 27

Supreme Court Affirms Electoral Roll Right as Sentimental, 34 Lakh Appeals Filed in West Bengal

PolityHIGH
Target:UPSC GS-IIMPSCSSC GATeachingPrelims HighMains MediumStatic GK Link
13 Apr 2026
~2 min
Source: The Hindu
Key Data:34 lakh appeals19 Appellate TribunalsApril 13, 2026
Bodies:Supreme CourtElection Commission
Practice MCQs from today's news ▸
What This Article Covers

1.The Supreme Court declared the right to be on the electoral roll and vote as both a constitutional and sentimental right.

2.The Court noted that 34 lakh appeals have been filed by voters purged from the West Bengal electoral roll, with over a lakh appeals pending before each of the 19 Appellate Tribunals.

3.The case highlights the crucial role of the Election Commission and Appellate Tribunals in safeguarding voter rights during electoral roll revisions.

The Big Picture
Prelims · HighMains · Medium

The Supreme Court has emphasized that the right to be on the electoral roll and vote is not just constitutional but also a sentimental right, especially for the 34 lakh voters purged from the West Bengal rolls. This statement came during a hearing concerning appeals filed before 19 Appellate Tribunals just ahead of the state's Assembly elections.

Exam Lens

Quick Exam Facts From News

Number of Appeals Filed34 lakh
Appellate Tribunals19
Date of HearingApril 13, 2026
State of FocusWest Bengal

1-Minute Revision

  • ›Number of Appeals Filed: 34 lakh
  • ›Appellate Tribunals: 19
  • ›Target this Data: 34 lakh appeals filed before 19 Appellate Tribunals in West Bengal.
  • ›Target this Nodal Body: The Election Commission of India (ECI).
  • ›Target this Legal Point: The Supreme Court's characterization of the voting right as a 'sentimental right'.

Mastered this topic? Test your knowledge with a full MCQ quiz.

Practice exam-style questions, track your score, and strengthen your recall.

Q1Static LinkageEasy

Under which Article of the Constitution is the Election Commission of India established?

Q2Statement-basedHard

Consider the following statements regarding the news:

1. The Supreme Court stated that the right to vote is only a constitutional right.

2. The 'logical discrepancies' category for removing voters was unique to West Bengal.

3. Appeals against removal from the electoral roll are heard by Appellate Tribunals.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Q3Data-centricMedium

According to the news, how many appeals by voters purged from the West Bengal electoral roll have been filed for hearing?

Q4Application/ImpactMedium

What was the primary context of the Supreme Court's remarks on the 'sentimental right' to vote?

All 15 MCQs ▸
You finished this topic
Explore Related Topics
Related Current Affairs
Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Split Verdict: Justice Dipankar Datta Terms Centre's Remarks on Collegium 'Disquieting'

In a split verdict, Justice Dipankar Datta of the Supreme Court strongly defended the collegium system, terming the Centre's oral criticism as 'disingenuous, evasive and disquieting'. The judgment reaffirms the judiciary's independence in appointments and warns against undermining institutional integrity. Essential for UPSC Polity (Judicial Appointments, Separation of Powers).

Health & Education Current Affairs

NEET-UG Reform: Two-Stage JEE Pattern Under Active Consideration, Govt Tells Supreme Court

The Centre informed the Supreme Court that it is actively considering shifting NEET-UG to a two-stage format on the JEE (Mains & Advanced) pattern. The final decision will await recommendations from the Nandan Nilekani-led High-Powered Task Force on exam reforms. This is crucial for medical aspirants as it could change the entire exam structure and enhance security against paper leaks.

Polity Current Affairs

Rajya Sabha Passes Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill 2026, Raising Judge Strength to 38

The Rajya Sabha has cleared the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026, raising the apex court's sanctioned strength from 34 to 38 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The Bill replaces a May ordinance, but Opposition MPs questioned the ordinance route and highlighted the persistent diversity deficit in judicial appointments. This is a high-yield Polity topic for Prelims and Mains, with concrete data on SC/ST/OBC/minority/women representation and judiciary infrastructure.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Delhi-NCR Sexual Assaults, Cites Article 21 and Nirbhaya Parallel

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of recent sexual assault cases in Delhi-NCR, flagging lax patrolling and administrative failures that make public spaces 'zones of high risk'. The court invoked Article 21 (right to life and personal liberty) and drew a painful parallel to the 2012 Nirbhaya case, demanding accountability and a measurable response from authorities. This has major implications for law enforcement accountability, women's safety, and judicial oversight.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Dismisses 2017 PIL to Abolish Hanging Execution; Centre May Review Alternatives

The Supreme Court dismissed a 2017 PIL seeking to replace hanging with less painful methods like lethal injection, but allowed the Centre to form an expert body to review execution methods. The judgment references the Law Commission's 187th Report and emphasizes preserving dignity while minimizing pain.

Polity Current Affairs

Article 124(3) Provision for 'Distinguished Jurist' as Supreme Court Judge Remains Unused Since 1950

Article 124(3) of the Constitution allows appointment of a 'distinguished jurist' as a Supreme Court judge, but this provision has never been invoked in 76 years. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan recently questioned this non-use, highlighting the lost opportunity for legal academics to contribute to the judiciary. This is a key constitutional issue for UPSC with potential for both prelims facts and mains analysis.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Directs FSSAI to Set Timeline for FoPL Phase-II High Fat-Sugar-Salt Warning Labels

The Supreme Court has asked FSSAI to provide a scientifically justified and clearly defined timeline for the second phase of Front-of-Package Labelling (FoPL) that warns about high fat, sugar, or salt in packaged foods. The court warned that without a deadline, implementation could be indefinitely postponed and also flagged gaps in label design and school-level nutritional literacy. The next hearing is scheduled for September 10.

Polity Current Affairs

Supreme Court Quashes NSA Detention in Sambhal Violence Case, ₹10 Lakh Cost on U.P.

The Supreme Court has held that the NSA detention of Sambhal violence accused Mulla Afroz was an 'illegal exercise' of power, imposing ₹10 lakh costs on the U.P. government. The ruling underscores that preventive detention under NSA cannot be based solely on custodial confessions and that detaining authorities must consider all relevant material — a core judicial review theme for Polity.